Review Round-Ups

Review Round-up: Kleist’s Prince Bows at Donmar

Editorial Staff

Editorial Staff

| London's West End |

28 July 2010

Hot on the heels of the National’s Danton’s Death
comes The Prince of Homburg at the Donmar Warehouse, another historical epic
charting a European revolutionary’s fall from grace.

The play, written by Heinrich von Kleist in 1809, takes place in 17th century Prussia
rather than 18th century France and follows the idealistic Prince of
Homburg as he is sentenced to death for disobeying military orders, despite
returning victorious from the battlefields of Fehrbellin.

Von Kleist’s original verse is given a modern lick of prose
paint by writer Dennis Kelly and director Jonathan Munby. The title role is
tackled by Charlie Cox, whose Prince is counterpointed by Ian McDiarmid’s villainous Elector of Brandenburg. The
production opened at the Donmar Warehouse on 22 July 2010 and will run until 4
September.

Did this Prince divide or conquer
the critics?


  • Michael Coveney on Whatsonstage.com (three stars) – “Jonathan Munby’s revival…
    certainly looks like a Donmar production: torches, flagstones, big dark wall,
    great lighting (by Neil Austin), doomy music… Ian McDiarmid plays the
    Elector of Brandenburg as a viperish intellectual sadist… This slightly
    unbalances the central guessing game of who’s abiding by the rules of honour on
    the subject of the prince’s salvation or execution. And there seems to be an
    odd re-writing of the last act … Charlie Cox is a splendid, straightforward
    Romantic prince… even though his articulation tends to be slovenly. And there’s
    a great array of Prussian military types led by David Burke’s stern
    commanding officer, William Hoyland’s humanely dedicated infantry colonel,
    bloodied but unbowed, and Julian Wadham’s slyly inflected, very funny, field
    marshall. The prince has his Horatio, too, in the devoted figure of Harry
    Hadden-Paton
    ’s royal count, and there are delicate, pointed contributions from
    Siobhan Redmond as the Electress and Sonya Cassidy as Natalia… But
    without any real sense of Kleist’s poetry, and a lot of idiomatic low-grade
    speech, you don’t feel close to the heart of this strange, slippery European
    milestone.”

  • Michael Billington in the Guardian (three stars) – “Heinrich von Kleist‘s great German play… has been
    given a new ending by Dennis Kelly which perverts the play’s meaning and
    undermines an otherwise fascinating evening… To the Nazis, (the play) was
    clearly a vindication of obedience to a strict military code; and both Kelly’s
    version, with its references to the “Fatherland”, and Jonathan Munby‘s
    production, with its orgy of Prussian heel-clicking, treat the play as if it
    were guilty by association with national socialism. But Kleist’s play is
    infinitely more subtle and morally ambiguous than that… The tantalising thing
    is that when Munby’s production sticks close to the original, it is very good. Angela
    Davies
    ‘s design, Neil Austin‘s lighting and Dominic Haslam‘s music lend
    the opening sequence a phantasmagoric quality. Charlie Cox also catches
    perfectly the uncertainty of the prince himself torn between cowardice and
    heroism… But the dilemma of this production is expressed by Ian McDiarmid‘s
    oddly confusing performance as the Elector. On one level, McDiarmid gives us a
    neat display of manipulative irony and handles the potential military
    insurrection with an amused guile. But gradually McDiarmid turns into a barking
    autocrat shrieking ‘I want rules and order.’ And, while it would be unfair to
    reveal the new ending, I can only say that it is not what Kleist wrote or
    intended.”

  • Libby Purves in The Times
    (three stars) – “The Prince of Homburg is a romantic soldier, prone to mooning
    over Princess Natalia and fabulous lines like ‘Night out here is like a Persian
    bride, it wraps its hair around you like perfume…” Beautiful Charlie Cox
    resolves the psychological atavism of this transition by playing it like a
    high-spirited, good-hearted sixth former: it works. Natalia is an honest
    performance by Sonya Cassidy, and brother-officers click and bark with
    convincing brittleness and occasional Germanic soupiness… But the real star is Ian
    McDiarmid
    as the Elector: a bleak, arid slave to principle; a tick-box tyrant…
    Curiously, the bleaker and odder and more Prussian the outlook gets in Act II,
    the more absurdities draw huffs of hilarity from a tense audience… Expect no happy ending. But any
    Nazi seeking to recruit this play to the cause wouldn’t end it quite as Kleist,
    Kelly and Munby do. The last ‘Heils!’ ring as hollow as the thunk of any
    guillotine.”

  • Quentin
    Letts in the Daily
    Mail

    “Here is a play about the clash
    between military heroism and martial law. Should it go for laughs? Last night’s
    audience of Donmar friends and supporters certainly thought so… Every time these
    men clicked their heels and slammed their chests in salute, young women in the
    stalls giggled. You’d have thought they were watching an episode of TV’s
    Blackadder…The audience’s reaction was the result of Jonathan Munby‘s
    relentlessly modern direction. He has his actors gurn and gawp and play things
    for humour in places where far greater power could come from sticking to the
    rigidity of the military codes of the 19th-century Prussia setting. Charlie
    Cox
    ‘s prince is convincingly headstrong but there is a disastrous scene when
    he tells a friend that he has been sentenced to death… Mr McDiarmid, despite
    his amazingly deep voice, is miscast. He hams and camps and rolls his eyes…There
    should be more to admire in this show… In this director’s insufficiently serious
    grasp, it underwhelms.”

  • Henry Hitchings
    in the Evening
    Standard
    (two stars) –

    Dennis Kelly’s rendition suggests the
    modernity of Kleist’s writing, particularly in its scrutiny of anxieties and
    embarrassments. However, the highly-strung wit of Kleist’s verse is lost in a
    welter of rhetoric, and Kelly has unnecessarily amended Kleist’s ending. Charlie
    Cox
    effectively evokes the prince’s adolescent brand of disquiet… Better when
    passionate than when contemplative, he too often seems merely earnest. More
    memorable, though not happily so, is Ian McDiarmid as the Elector, who veers
    between a Blackadder-ish smoulder and the strangled rage of a cartoon fascist.
    He has moments of wintry gravity, yet his performance is weirdly mannered. There
    is some deft work from Harry Hadden-Paton and David Burke. But Jonathan
    Munby
    ’s production is either too static or bombastic, and it accentuates
    without much subtlety the play’s relevance to Hitler’s Germany… True, there are
    flickers of familiar Donmar dazzle, mainly in the stronger second half, and Angela
    Davies
    ’s design is ingenious. But The Prince of Homburg is
    a misfire from this so often excellent theatre.”

  • – Lydia Onyett

    Latest Reviews

    See all

    Theatre news & discounts

    Get the best deals and latest updates on theatre and shows by signing up for WhatsOnStage newsletter today!