Posted 16 July 2008 - 10:13 AM
The form "Sunset" has taken this time, the actor/nusician thing, was determined not so much to be "cheap", although as low cost as possible essential to be viable, but to enable it to be staged at all in the relatively small Watermill. They couldn't have physically put on a huge production. That it has apparently worked so well must surely mean that such a cost effective production would/should tour really well. But I do tend to agree that a production designed for a limited stage, would not necessarily be appropriate for a large West End theatre. In a bigger arena, for long term intent, you would need the paraphenalia, the staircase and the orchestra etc. But I am not sure that the issue is so much that ALW would not want his "lavish masterpiece to be represented in the West End by a cheap actor-musician version". I don't think he would have approved it at all, if he hadn't been a bit curious to see how it might work without the trappings. And I suspect he will be very pleased if the reception is as good as it is looking it might be. It potentially gives the show legs that it wouldn't necessarily otherwise have had, where I think he would like his creation to be seen and heard first and foremost. And if this enables it to be able to reach more people, then that isn't going to be a bad thing, especially if it could be used to raise the show's profile ahead of the ever delayed film. And if people really want to see it in the West End, then I wouldn't write the possibility off. I don't imagine a long term production would be considered, but a limited run "by public demand" is not so completely unfeasible. Whether he would be prepared to use a non-RUG theatre though, is another question. And availability (of not ridiculously huge theatre either) might be a problem.