QUOTE(smith @ Aug 10 2007, 10:02 AM)

I cannot describe how much I enjoyed reading all those bad reviews for Grease. Does this make me a bad person?!
The production is the pits. Badly cast allroud, awfully staged, horrid set, no chemistry. Its lost all it infectious charm and youthfulness - the only thing that keeps it going are the wondeful hit records - otherwise this show would be worse than Fame, which I have to say if better staged and produced than this revival.
With all the money it must have taken, you would have thought more time would have gone into this production, the sets are so cheap its asif handy andy has just spent a day chopping down the dominion set fit the piccadilly and touch it up again with paint - the costumes look awful and badly sized and just bland. No energy or emotion is displayed between Danny and Sandy, The T Bird and Pink Ladies or indeed the group as a whole. We are supposed to idolise and want to be part of this wonderful group - frankly Id rather be in Euguenes gang!
The show just striked me as a tour show i was going to see right at the end of its umpteenth year run - the production looked already that worn down...i dread to think what state it can go into becuase its already hit a new low for the West End.
Save your money people...even Dirty Dancing is better worth a view (at least thats had money thrown at it and is looks better produced) - I really hope this show proves to be a flop (doubtful as gullable public will probabluy flock...) to teach David Ian that you cannot just put a show on TV to find your leads and sell lots of tickets and don't care about how you actually treat the show and stage it. At least Webber put money and thought into the show as whole - the whole Grease thing from its TV show to now stage just seems very cheap, bland, rushed and just a poor excuse to milk it for its worth and just make more money. We all now the business is about making money - but c'mon at least put some heart into it. A disgrace.