Synopsis Stanley Webber is the only resident of a seaside boarding house run by Meg and Petey. His life is safe, comfortable but monotonous. Goldberg and McCann, two sinister strangers who arrive with a mysterious motive and throw Stanley a surprise birthday party, shatter their lives! This modern classic is an enigmatic comedy full of menace and psychological terror. Pinter's first full-length play was described as a masterpiece upon its debut performance in 1958.
Harold Pinter’s modern classic, The Birthday Party, is 47 this year. Its first London outing, at the Lyric Hammersmith in 1958, closed after only eight performances thanks to an almost universal critical panning - only Harold Hobson recognised the originality of the writing. Thankfully, though, it proved rather more popular with subsequent audiences and has enjoyed regular productions ever since, this current incarnation arriving at the West End’s Duchess via Birmingham and a brief regional tour.
In the play, Pinter presents us with a supremely dysfunctional living arrangement: Meg and Petey run a boarding house in which Stanley is their only inmate, although the place serves as a prison of sorts for all three, trapped in their own mundane lives. Petey is a deckchair attendant while wife Meg keeps house and takes exceptional pride in the standard of her cornflakes. Their patterns and habits provide a semblance of safety, even extending to their conversations captured by Pinter with humdrum repetitive brilliance. They don’t even have to listen to one another any more.
But if these two are odd, it’s Stanley who’s the real worry. A grown man and ex-pianist, he remains in his pyjamas all day, seemingly suffering from depression, and has an ambiguous mother/lover relationship with Meg that’s a Freudian field day. Is he hiding out? And if so, from what or whom? Well, very possibly from Goldberg and McCann, two men who show up to stay (a rare event) on what happens to be Stanley’s birthday (perhaps). But have they really come to take him away?
Pinter uses this absurd, nightmarish situation to explore his reccurring themes of power and the tyranny of those who wield it. In Lindsay Posner’s assured production, what comes across most strongly is the characters’ need to talk, to fill the void in typical Beckettian fashion, regardless of whether anyone is listening or hearing what they say. A sudden blackout in the middle of the piece drives home the point. Suddenly the characters have to listen intently –and we too have to sharpen our senses to try and guess what’s going on.
Of the show’s star billing, one half delivers unflinchingly. Eileen Atkins is incredible as Meg, an innocent girl in an old woman’s body. Her naivety transforms moments that could be grotesque into ones that are extremely touching. Henry Goodman’s Goldberg is a real entertainer, vain and charismatic, but he lacks the dark quality necessary to fully convince of Goldberg’s menace.
Elsewhere in a production filled with strong performances, Finbar Lynch stands out as McCann. So often played as a foil, a sounding board to Goldberg, here McCann creates a complex and detailed characterisation. It’s a hilarious performance, and Lynch so entirely inhabits his character it’s hard to take your eyes off him whenever he’s on stage.
All in all, Posner and his cast really ‘serve the text’, resulting in an undiluted, no-nonsense production. This is Pinter as it should be done.
Perfect casting, impeccable staging, great performances, with a design that's spot-on.....but The Birthday Party still isn't worth all this talent. An over-rated play from Britain's most over-rated playwright. - 81.134.71.192)
23 Jun 05
Do you have plays that you see repeatedly? For me, this is one of those, and this is possibly the best production I've seen. For those of you who are baffled by the play, bear in mind that rather than tell a story, it aims to explore themes (manipulation, dominance, individuals vs 'the system') and create atmosphere. Also, for me it's always been a sort of compendium of just about everything theatre can potentially do - comedy, violence, menace, physicality, silence, quickfire dialogue, different dynamics, etc. There's even a blackout. It's as though the fledgling playwright was trying out everything in his box of tricks.
The performances in this production are wonderful, bringing the most richness to this motley collection of characters I've ever seen. The set is as perfect a rendering of a seedy, run-down 1950s guest house as you could hope for. There are some nice directorial touches I've not seen before in this play. And it all combines to lift a play I've always loved to even greater heights. Such a shame that the theatre was barely half-full, and the run is closing early, in a sort of mirroring of its debut nearly 50 years ago. Both the play and this terrific production deserve better. It's nice though to see that it can still furrow people's brows to the extent that it does, judging from some of the comments here and ones I heard at the theatre. Nicer still to see that some of those a bit confused by it still recognise it as a good piece of work. - 194.82.50.2)
16 Jun 05
Can't really give mre than 3 stars for something that is very unsatisfying in its conclusion.
Yes, very well acted but surely there should be more to help us understand. - 217.34.115.49)
14 Jun 05
As long as you don't expect any conclusive answers from the script itself, this is a very satisfying night at the theatre: in Lindsay Posner's perfectly pitched production, all of Pinter's pitch black humour and simmering menace comes across. The acting across the board couldn't be better: Henry Goodman is absolutely brilliant, as ever, and it is fascinating to watch an actress of Eileen Atkins' intelligence and integrity playing such a simple (ok, dumb) character. Such is her skill and humanity that she never once patronises Meg or makes her a grotesque...the result is funny, honest, touching, and a masterclass in performing. Even if the elusiveness of Pinter isn't to your taste, see it for the acting. - 195.82.123.181)
04 Jun 05
Consider this a truncated review, an oh-so slightly differing view from Hannah Kennedy's. Where I have to disagree vehemently is on Henry Goodman's performance as Goldberg. Rarely has sleaze been cultivated to such high art. His eyes glitter with a fever or madness that's been corralled into socially acceptable behaviour on the surface, the hurried way he moves through banal exchanges about his real name (Is it Nate? Is it Simon? Is it Benny?) reflect a man of many identities, probably many of which we really don't want to know. I thought he was evil personified -- dangerously charming, and the best possible party guest and master of ceremonies! - 81.154.107.188)
26 Apr 05
I attended the WOS outing to this play last night and was blown away by it. neither i nor my boyfriend had any idea what it was all about but it was still staggering. And it's elusiveness was the subject of much heated discussion in the bar afterwards (free drinks!) with other theatregoers and with the actors themselves. great evening - 82.69.37.108)
Opened 25 Nov 1929. 476 seats. Bought from Andrew Lloyd Webber and now owned by Broadway producer Max Weitzenhoffer and Nica Burns. Society of London Theatre member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.