Synopsis Martin Crimp's '17 scenarios for the theatre', shocking and hilarious by turns, are a roller-coaster of late 20th century obsessions. From pornography and ethnic violence, to terrorism and unprotected sex, its strange array of nameless characters attempt to invent the perfect story to encapsulate our time. Part of the Travelex £10 Season
Katie Mitchell’s tenth anniversary production of Martin Crimp’s Attempts on Her Life opened at the National’s Lyttelton Theatre last night (Wednesday 14 March 2007, previews from 8 March), for a limited run to 10 May (See News, 2 Nov 2006).
A rollercoaster of late 20th-century obsessions, Crimp’s “17 scenarios for the theatre” cover everything from pornography to ethnic violence, terrorism and unprotected sex care of a strange array of nameless characters who try to define one woman. The cast are: Kate Duchene, Michael Gould, Jacqueline Kington, Claudie Blakley, Liz Kettle, Dina Korzun, Helena Lymbery, Paul Ready, Jonah Russell, Zubin Varla and Sandra Voe. The technically advanced, multimedia production is designed by Vicki Mortimer, with lighting by Paule Constable.
Overnight critics were divided in their reactions to the piece. While some loved the inventive use of new media and enjoyed the humorous pastiches of popular television programmes and styles, others found the cast rushing around to set up television screens and cameras distracting and longed for more on-stage drama. While they agreed Mitchell brought originality to Crimp’s play, one or two reviewers felt she over-complicated the already ambiguous plot with special effects.
Michael Coveney on Whatsonstage.com (4 stars) – “Attempts on Her Life is no less intriguing than it was ten years ago at the Royal Court. But Katie Mitchell’s revival… elevates it into something else: a brilliant, updated (with instant video replay, projections, microphones and music) application of Brecht’s alienation effect in considering the slippery identity of an all-purpose 1990s woman…. The most striking aspect of the production… is its non-stop technical activity…. The cast… assembles in a straight, rippling line before embarking on a non-stop dash between musical instruments and video and sound equipment. A large screen selects scenes and images from the scramble on stage below, and actors are seen from a constant variety of angles, as is Anne’s biography. The fragmented nature of the show does not, paradoxically, militate against the actors making an impression. Apart from his definitive Judas Iscariot in Jesus Christ Superstar, I had no idea that Zubin Varla was such an accomplished musician…. Other stand-out contributions come from the delightful Claudie Blakley, Dina Korzun (a Russian actress lending supermodel glamour to the car speech), Liz Kettle, Kate Duchene, Paul Ready and Jonah Russell. But this is above all an ensemble achievement of a kind you rarely see.”
Michael Billington in the Guardian (3 stars) - “Much as I admire Crimp's text, I'm not sure it is helped by Katie Mitchell's hi-tech revival, which has strong echoes of her recent version of Virginia Woolf's Waves…. Since the play is an attack on limiting definitions, it is hard to pin any single meaning on it. But it partly pursues the Pirandellian idea that coherent identity is a myth. Crimp goes even further than the great Sicilian, however, in creating a prose-poem that implies our notion of the individual ego is being steadily eroded by a mixture of rampant consumerism, global capitalism and technological advance. The virtue of Crimp's play is that it offers carte blanche to its director. But Mitchell's version for me focuses too exclusively on media manipulation at the expense of the play's political purpose. On a stage crowded with lights, cameras and video screens, each scene becomes a new set-up offering us a different image of Anne. And, while this means the 11 actors are kept restlessly busy, it too often turns the play into a self-conscious media satire.”
Nicholas de Jongh in the Evening Standard (1 star) – “Anyone who attempts to understand, let alone appreciate, Martin Crimp's satirical panorama of political, cultural and social decadence in the decade before Mr Blair took control of our lives in 1997, will find its director Katie Mitchell gets in the way. It is hard enough to follow Mr Crimp's streams of consciousness as they flow in multiple directions and 17 scenes, without a specific plot or real characters to serve as anchors in the choppy waters of the non-sequential narrative. Mitchell, until recently one of the finest directors of her generation, distracts from what is said and done, with frantic on-stage activity as her performers double as scene-setters and musicians and work several video cameras…. Mitchell keeps nudging us to observe her flamboyant creative process. Her actors, pontificating as absurd cultural arbiters on television or dealing with a girl's attempted suicide, tend to overheated performances…. Anne becomes the ‘new Anny’, a car in a revue-style scene that begins as marketing hyperbole and develops into a scathing, surreal apology for a vehicle that has no association with the world's violence or depravity. Typically the scene's verbal potency is lost because it succumbs to Mitchellitis - a dreadful form of directorial embellishment. ”
Alice Jones in the Independent - “An ‘open text’, Attempts on Her Life refuses to assign lines to specific characters and notes only that it should be played by ‘a company of actors’. It's a dream ticket for Mitchell, a keen practitioner of director's theatre. And she really goes to town here, dealing with the play's transfer from its original intimate setting to the cavernous Lyttelton stage with a large cast of 11, all kitted out with face microphones and cameras…. In this hugely ambitious production, the action is entirely played out on screens above the stage. On to these are projected the movements and speeches of the cast in a huge variety of filming techniques - noirish close-ups of the feet of a murder victim morph into overlit television commercials and grainy police videos…. In many cases this video work is spectacular and effectively evokes a society in which life is lived through a lens and every action is filtered by the media. But Crimp's clever-clever writing is often submerged in the whirl of camera-work and pastiches…. By the end of two hours of close-ups, I began to crave some human warmth from the stage, rather than just scurrying around setting up cameras…. At times this piece about the spiritual vacuum at the heart of Nineties, and now Noughties, society felt just like an art installation - slick, chilly and a little shallow. But, then again, perhaps that was the point.”
Martin Crimp’s Attempts on her Life is no less intriguing than it was ten years ago at the Royal Court. But Katie Mitchell’s revival in the NT Lyttelton elevates it into something else: a brilliant, updated (with instant video replay, projections, microphones and music) application of Brecht’s alienation effect in considering the slippery identity of an all-purpose 1990s woman.
Over seventeen sharp and information-packed scenes enacted by a cast of eleven wearing black, we learn that Anne is a suicidal artist, a porn star, an urban terrorist (more Bader Meinhof than religious fanatic), a girl next door who went off with a married man, a charity worker, a grieving mother carrying the limbs of her children in a bag, and a symbolic object of consumerist desire, a sleek and sexy sports car.
The title implies both the impossibility of pinning anyone down and the various strategies of the subject designed to finish things off. As in Mark Ravenhill’s recent pool (no water), a tragic life becomes an art object, rather in the manner of Cindy Sherman’s, or even Tracey Emin’s, and a clique of critics – including hilarious send-ups of Germaine Greer and Tom Paulin – sit around picking over the bones in a television studio. She doesn’t need art school, she needs psychiatric help, says one of the Late Review sages, creepily echoing one theatre critic’s reaction to a Sarah Kane shocker before the playwright’s death.
The most striking aspect of the production – which, to be strictly accurate, is “directed by Katie Mitchell and the Company” – is its non-stop technical activity, a continuation of Mitchell’s Wooster Group-inspired NT work on The Seagull and Waves. The cast – which includes Sandra Voe from the original – assembles in a straight, rippling line before embarking on a non-stop dash between musical instruments and video and sound equipment. A large screen selects scenes and images from the scramble onstage below, and actors are seen from a constant variety of angles, as is Anne’s biography.
The fragmented nature of the show does not, paradoxically, militate against the actors making an impression. Apart from his definitive Judas Iscariot in Jesus Christ Superstar, I had no idea that Zubin Varla was such an accomplished musician. He plays Bach, Beethoven, Purcell (“Dido’s Lament”) and leads a tremendous company performance of an indie-style pop song (“She’s a terrorist threat, she’s a mother of three, she’s a cheap cigarette, she is Ecstasy”).
Other stand-out contributions come from the delightful Claudie Blakley, Dina Korzun (a Russian actress lending supermodel glamour to the car speech), Liz Kettle, Kate Duchene, Paul Ready and Jonah Russell. But this is above all an ensemble achievement of a kind you rarely see anywhere, let alone at the National. Mitchell is abetted, as usual, by her design team of Vicki Mortimer and Paule Constable (lighting).
The video designs of Leo Warner are as crucial to the impact of what has clearly become a classic of contemporary theatre as are the music and sound of Paul Clark and Gareth Fry. You might not, I suppose, love the show all that much. But you will see nothing else like it all year.
It's a shame that those who enjoyed and posted reviews to say so had to resort to oh so predictable haughtiness. Trying to make those of us who didn't enjoy it feel silly, uneducated and inadequate is just so typical of these kind of people.
(But two can play at that game I guess)
The kind of people I'm talking about are the sort you get in the Tate Modern cooing and gasping at a student's unmade bed, a pile of bricks and even a pair of used underpants Like modern art, this kind of modern theatre represents the disease of postmodernism at its worst.
Oh, we thought it was a
absolute trash, and not even worth £10. - James
08 May 07
Well this certainly seems to bring out an emotional response one way or another! Personally I’d have to rank it as one of the most memorable (for all good reasons!) plays I have seen in recent years. Just a few more days left to catch this amazing piece of theatre before it closes and I would definitely recommend the trip to the South Bank. Saw it both on opening preview and again last week with different friends. Between the viewings I read up on the "Education" section for "Attempts" on the National's homepage. This explains the setting/background that this particular cast have chosen for the play.. and I won't go into that here, because it is not included in the programme and is not made known to the audience – so some may consider it a "spoiler", a mechanism that was in place for the benefit of the actors, unnecessary knowledge that distracts from the messages of the scenes. Not that I think so. I deliberated on whether to reveal my discoveries to my friend this time around, as it was her first view – but in the end she declared that being aware of the details, really enhanced the enjoyment. I'd have to agree. It gives the improv context, makes the shared nervous glances of the cast .. the klaxon that marks the end of each story .. the looking at their watches at the end..all make sense! It does not get in the way – If you have tickets. If you are thinking of tickets. Think of reading it. Thank you Katie Mitchell and your amazing multi-talented (esp. Zubin Varla!) cast! - Jules
06 May 07
If you can't find anything redeming in this very experimental production then i don't beleive you can really call yourself a theatre lover.
This play is far from perfect and the production beats your senses into submission way too much. However that said not all plays need a normal narrative or a naturalistic setting. I love the teatro de complicite and imaginative physical theatre, but i think Katie Mitchell just got a bit carried away with this one. I will admire it's bright moments rather than deride its numerous follys!!!! - Nick Marshall
12 Apr 07
Erratum: In the previous review I meant to refer to Waves as being dire and not Dream Play, which I actually enjoyed. - rds
29 Mar 07
I agree totally with the previous reviewer. Only it was easy for me to leave as I was just six seats from the aisle the others having already been vacated by their disgruntled occupants. I stuck it for 35 miserable minutes. There should be a society for the protection of audiences from the cruelty of misguided and untalented writers and directors. I would have shouted out to those still "stuck" in the auditorium - "get up and leave - it isn't compulsory to stay you know!" - but my less than bold companion told me to hush! What made it worse was that there were many young people in the audience (who laughed loudly, and inappropriatley, at the use of various expletives) and who may also have been making their first visit to the National - it could have put them off theatre for life! Hopefully it didn't. Now it would be unfair to say I haven't given Ms Mitchell a chance, as indeed the National have done. I saw The Seagull - pass, and Dream Play - dire. Yet I came back willing her to make something of this play. How does she get away with it? Can she dish the dirt on Mr Hytner? Come on Nick - give someone else a chance. I really love the National and congratulate it for taking chances - once yes, twice maybe but any more - enough!. The title of this play could sum up the audience's thoughts on the director! - rds
29 Mar 07
One of the most boring evenings I've endured (well, since Europe at the Barbican last week to be honest). Truly style over substance with a few minor decent bits but otherwise a trudge through some distracting visuals. A number of the audience left and I rapidly realised the reason for the lack of interval - this would have given more opportunity for people to leave. Those lucky people on the side aisles! - Martin B
27 Mar 07
Do I detect the same person posting two negative reviews below?
A good production and worthy of the RNT, loved the wonderful Zubin Varla, that man has talent oozing from every pore! The play isn't as good as the production I felt. I would have given it four but because of the nefarious tactics below I'll give it the benefit of the doubt. - Julian
16 Mar 07
Well there's no middle ground on this one is there?
Anyway, to the production, It's not perfect but I never find anything perfect (thats' the problem with seeing so much theatre, nothing ever matches the ideal!) I was transfixed throughout, however, and I'm really not sure why some cannot see what 'the point' is, it's pretty easy to follow when you realise that it's basically a series of separate sketches. I find the mechanics of image making and representation fascinating so this is perfect for someone like me.
Ignore those who try and tell you you're something just short of a serial killer for liking this, scary, scary people....... - P Allen
16 Mar 07
Absolutely lame production. Ignore those who, like the reviewer below, can’t deal with anyone disagreeing with them and therefore make crass, shallow presumptions while wallowing in their own smug self-congratulation, and labouring under the misconception that they’re in some kind of elite by lauding experimental-theatre-by-numbers like this. Soporific, visually overblown, and delusional of purpose. If you care about theatre and not just sneering at that which has no pretension of supposedly pushing boundaries, avoid the Lyttelton and leave this mess to those tiresome overbearing types who ludicrously think this deserves five stars.
- Jackie Deacon
16 Mar 07
Absolutely extraordinary production, ignore those who have their own set views of theatre and its boundaries, their smug self-congratulation is to be seen at the National lauding many dull retreads because they didn't have to think too hard.
Kaleidoscopic, visually stunning, elusive and allusive in meaning, if you care about theatre and not just sneering at that which you don't understand get along to the Lyttelton and replace the pretentious bores who think this deserves zero. - Alan Whitfield
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.