Synopsis Three short dance pieces. Swinging - A Forest glade, 1767, A Servant, an Aristocrat, a Girl on a Swing. Did You Move? - An Italian restaurant, Queens, 1954; A Wife, a Husband, A Headwaiter. Contact - An Advertising Executive, a Bartender, a Girl in a Yellow Dress. All of the musical accompaniment is recordings of tunes, from classical to pop to swing.
From the moment the curtain goes up on a playfully erotic divertissement to an electrifying curtain call finale, danced to Van Morrison's "Moondance", two hours later, there's no smarter, sexier or more surprising evening in London than Contact.
This Broadway import won the Tony Award for Best Musical two years ago. Though naysayers are right to doubt its billing as a musical - there's no original score, nothing's sung live and even the music is pre-recorded - it has the kind of sheen and style that owes its progeny to such previous Broadway dance revues as Dancin' and Fosse.
It's no coincidence that both of those previous shows, of course, celebrated the work of the late, great Bob Fosse, one of Broadway's leading director/choreographers, whose mantle as a hit maker - if not quite in the same league as an innovator - Susan Stroman has lately inherited.
Having followed Stro (as everyone in the business calls her) from her 1991 off-Broadway hit of Kander and Ebb songs And the World Goes Round, I've seen her evolution and elevation in just over a decade to the top rank of Broadway's creative personnel that has climaxed in her direction and choreography of The Producers.
There is, now, no one better at making dance illuminate character, getting props to come to life as part of a dance, or sending the audience themselves home dancing on air. But could an evening of her dance be the evening, rather than a mere component part of illuminating one?
Rather than making Contact the abstract kind of evening beloved of modern dance companies, Stroman wisely teamed up with writer John Weidman to create a series of snappy narratives for the dance to dramatise. These aren't so much plots as scenarios, but they provide an essential framework.
The first and slightest piece brings 'The Swing', an 18th-century painting by Jean-Honore Fragonard that hangs in London's Wallace Collection, to life, and provides an effervescently erotic display of courtship on a swing.
Then, in 'Did You Move?, set in New York in the 1950s, a tale of domestic violence disturbingly emerges as we observe a couple out for a buffet dinner in an Italian restaurant. Exerting total control over his wife (ex-Royal Ballet star Sarah Wildor), the husband (a hulking Craig Urbani, late of Buddy) orders her to not to talk, smile or even move as he goes to get more cannelloni. But he can't stop her from dreaming, and it's in her dreams that she escapes. Wildor is simply stunning: touching and true in her vulnerability, chilling in her eventual explosion of anger and resentment.
For the most substantial part of the evening, the title ballet 'Contact' recalls the milieu of lonely Manhattan bachelorhood of Sondheim's Company and the dark, painful night of the soul that the character Bobby undergoes in that show is mirrored here by a suicidal advertising executive (Michael Praed) who finds release and the human contact he so craves in a downtown dance club. There, he's drawn to a mesmerising figure, a girl in a yellow dress who - as danced by Leigh Zimmerman - is so slick, sleek and sensational that you, like him, cannot avert your eyes from her for a second.
While the Queen's with its barely raked stalls isn't the ideal home for Contact - make sure you sit upstairs in one of the circles for the best views - it's wonderful to have this exciting, exhilarating evening in town.
Hopefully this will be replaced by a better value for money show. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.103.216.78)
06 May 03
Coming off, not a moment before time (barf!) - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.103.219.182)
26 Apr 03
Original yes. Good choreography and dancing yes. However, this doesn't make for a good night in the theatre. The first piece is awful; the next two have their merits - but I'm afraid it doesn't really add up to £40 worth and a satisfying night out. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.211.110.23)
26 Apr 03
Advised to go and see this 'wonderful musical' by my Musical Theatre Tutor.
I was very disappointed!
Musical? I don't think so.
Act 1 and 11 were in my opinion a waste of my time. Act 111 was good, I was fortunate to the full cast, but was pleased I had managed to buy reduced priced tickets thanks to Ken Livingstone!!! £10- just about what it was worth. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.168.163)
19 Apr 03
Cute people in swings, in cafes, and (God help us) a girl in a yellow dress don't provide enough dsramatic stimulus. Seeing an audience just gawking at the sexiness of the actors is NOT worth your £40 by any means. At the end of the day, this is modern dance, misleadingly advertised as a musical. (Presumably to get bums on seats?) - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.50.13)
10 Mar 03
I wasn't that keen on seeing contact.. had heard from a few people that it was a pale imitation of the Broadway verion and should be seen on a thrust stage... but others had told me was much fresher here.. Before I mention the show I saw another piece of terribly bad behavior.. a mid 50's woman was asked to stop talking by the elderly couple in friont of her.. so she freaked out and started banging her plastic bags around to deliberatly annoy them.. until I leaned over and said "For Gods Sake" and she stopped..
I was really surprised by how much I enjoyed it.. the third part is the only completely satisfactory piece for me but the other two were interesting....
I was slightly perturbed in the audience reaction to Craig Urbani as the abusive husband in part 2.. I didn't think it was funny that he was abusing her but many seemed to.. I can see there is much humour in that piece but not from his actions shouting at her... oh hum... Sarah Wildor was just amazing as the wife dreaming of escape.. really expressive and touching.. a wonderful performance.
I was blown away by the third piece, Contact.. and I thought theat Michael Praed did a fantastic job in the role.. Craig Urbani was excellent as the bar keeper.. and Leigh Zimmerman took by breath away.. really sexy and magnetic as the girl in the yellow dress.. The company of dancers were exceptional.. I was really emotionally involved in this story.. even though I am sure everyone could see the twists coming from a mile away it really works as a stunning dance piece...
The whole night seemed to be over in ten minutes... really liked it..
Cheers, Lee. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.86.234.1)
06 Mar 03
To the vomitorium! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.50.13)
02 Mar 03
Yawn! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.177.88.42)
21 Feb 03
Boring, vain and a waste of time. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.34.187)
15 Feb 03
We went expecting a musical, but although the dancing is fine, there's nothing here to suggest a musical. Really poor dinner-theatre stuff and NOT worth the money. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.34.187)
Sister theatre to the adjoining Gielgud (originally the Globe) when it opened on 8 Oct 1907. Bombed in 1940, re-opened in 1959. 979 seats. Member of the Society of London Theatre. In 1999 Delfont Mackintosh Theatres Limited acquired the freehold of the Queen s and the Gielgud Theatres from Christ s Hospital, Horsham. The lease of the Gielgud Theatre will revert back from Really Useful Theatres to Delfont Mackintosh Theatres in March 2006 after which there are plans to refurbish both venues and to build a 500-seat theatre, The Sondheim, above the Queen s. This will be the first new theatre in Shaftesbury Avenue since 1931.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.