Synopsis Intent on the conquest of Peru, Spanish soldier Pizarro entices recruits with the promise of inconceivable riches, while the Church claims the cause for Christianity. The ensuing clash between two cultures leaves thousands of unarmed Inca troops slaughtered and sparks an intense battle of wills between the sun-god and his captor, as the Spaniards plunder for gold. Part of the Travelex £10 Season. Part of the £10 Travelex Season
Overnight critics were by and large impressed with the scale of Trevor Nunn’s revival of Peter Shaffer’s The Royal Hunt of the Sun, the first production in this year’s £10 Travelex Season, which opened last night in the NT Olivier (See News, 10 Nov 2005). However, although praising the epic proportions, many remained unconvinced by some of the “dated” messages on display.
Intent on the conquest of Peru, Spanish soldier Pizarro entices recruits with the promise of inconceivable riches, while the Church claims the cause for Christianity. The ensuing clash between two cultures leaves thousands of unarmed Inca troops slaughtered and sparks an intense battle of wills between the sun-god and his captor, as the Spaniards plunder for gold.
Nunn’s revival of Peter Shaffer’s 1964 play - which was the first new work to be staged by the National Theatre company under Laurence Olivier at the Old Vic – stars Alun Armstrong and Paterson Joseph, and continues in rep until 12 August 2006.
Michael Coveney on Whatsonstage.com - “In John Dexter’s original production, the massacre of the Incas was signified, unforgettably, in the simple strewing of the stage with red cloaks. Nunn’s instinct for spectacle is much gaudier: the eyes are assaulted with strobe lighting (an effect surely well past its sell-by date) and a red silk parachute billows across the stage.” But, Coveney noted: “The play stands up remarkably well as a metaphor of cultural imperialism, some even noting a parallel with Iraq.”
Michael Billington in the Guardian - “The play seems slightly dated in its exploration of the growing relationship between Pizarro and Atahuallpa, the Inca sovereign and self-styled sun-god. But, even if the core relationship of the second half lacks the potency it once possessed, Shaffer's play still makes impressive use of the theatre's resources. And Trevor Nunn's Olivier production, staged on Anthony Ward's vast circular disc, is mighty handsome to look at…. It all makes for an epic piece of theatre that keeps one engrossed by the visuals and the narrative.”
Benedict Nightingale in The Times - “There’s something about Shaffer’s seriousness which, as with his Amadeus and Equus, I can’t take wholly seriously… I sometimes felt I was being earnestly addressed by the Wizard of Oz, a gentleman rather smaller than his pretensions.” Nonetheless, Nightingale saluted the National for putting on such an epic: “How many other theatres would stage a serious play that needs more than 30 performers and requires its director, in this case Trevor Nunn, to dispatch Pizarro’s army over the Andes and into the vastness of Inca-dominated Peru?” And he was impressed with Nunn’s direction: “There’s much to admire in Nunn’s use of a bare, round, wooden stage with plenty of gorgeous costumes but a minimum of props…. The ascent of the Andes is stirring stuff.”
Paul Taylor in the Independent - “Unlike most dramas of the period where a trip across the drawing room to the drinks tray was the most arduous trek expected of the characters, this clash-of-civilisations epic sent a battalion of Spanish mercenaries on a stylised ascent of the Andes, junking all the trappings of naturalism and using the stage in the Shakespearean manner as a place where anything can happen by imaginative fiat.” Taylor was not too keen on Nunn’s “striking but, by and large, embarrassingly old-fashioned stage-craft and style” which “resorts to tired techniques”, and he didn’t like the Incas’ “pronounced ‘native’ accents… the whole approach to them is more Lion King than Peter Brook.” However, he was impressed with the cast, who are “spot on”. He added: “The production gathers power towards the close, but before that, this Royal Hunt too often loses the scent.”
Charles Spencer in the Daily Telegraph - "The years have not been kind to The Royal Hunt of the Sun… there is something almost touching about the way the writer seems to believe he has stumbled across profound new truths as he laboriously spells out the bleeding obvious. What’s surprising here, though, is that the windiness of the writing is often matched by a curiously lumbering production by Trevor Nunn, full of empty displays of ritual, dodgy choreography and naff mime sequences.” All in all, it’s a “spectacle of the emptiest kind” although “there are a few powerful performances.”
Nicholas de Jongh in the Evening Standard - In contrast to Spencer, De Jongh enjoyed Nunn's “flamboyantly drilled direction". "Shaffer's narrative of invasion in the first half is vitalised by clever visuals" and the finale, De Jongh proclaimed, is "one of the greatest in 20th-century drama".
Peter Shaffer’s 1964 epic chronicle about the Spanish conquest of Peru, full of feathers, gold, birdsong and billowing silk, was the first new play presented by the National Theatre: at Chichester, the Old Vic and for a season in the West End. Trevor Nunn’s revival – the first in London since a Prospect Theatre touring production visited the Round House in 1973 – restores the play to the big open spaces it deserves in the Olivier auditorium.
In John Dexter’s original production, the massacre of the Incas was signified, unforgettably, in the simple strewing of the stage with red cloaks. Nunn’s instinct for spectacle is much gaudier: the eyes are assaulted with strobe lighting (an effect surely well past its sell-by date) and a red silk parachute billows across the stage.
The play stands up remarkably well as a metaphor of cultural imperialism, some even noting a parallel with Iraq. But there was something both grander and more freakish about the adventure of a handful of Spanish mercenaries conquering an empire by capturing its sun god sovereign in 1532. Shaffer’s telling of the story focuses on the protagonists of two worlds: the grizzled 63-year-old Spanish general Francisco Pizarro, seeking a confirmation of his own faith as well as gold for his men; and the mysterious young Atahuallpa, bound in chains, offering a roomful of gold as a ransom.
The device of a narrator who participates in his own story as a younger man gives the play a resonance and poignancy I had forgotten. Malcolm Storry as the older Martin Ruiz is a powerful advocate. Never scaling the gruffly compelling heights of Colin Blakely as Pizarro, Alun Armstrong stumbles, rather than surges, through the play and opens out too easily to the exotic lessons in humanity from his prisoner.
Those lessons are beautifully discharged by Paterson Joseph as Atahuallpa, a gleaming, untouchable icon who locates the central homoerotic fascination in his lovely harvest song about the little finch. Robert Stephens originally created a monument to artifice greatly influenced by Laurence Olivier’s Othello, with an Aztec profile, a squawking voice and swept back hair like Maria Callas’. Joseph’s approach is wonderfully direct and self-assured, elegance of movement matched with blazing eyes.
Marc Wilkinson’s original music plays its part here, though the evening is marred by Nunn’s insistence on over-microphoning the actors as well as the musicians. Anthony Ward’s simple design of a raised wooden disc, and his colourful costumes, are just the job in an evening where the presentation, while a little too fustian in its epic gesticulations, still clarifies the heart of a great story.
This kind of dewy eyed, romantic theatre probably worked brilliantly in the 60s and 70s but it just won't wash now. It looks even more dated than some fusty old Victorian melodrama. The National is - again - producing tripe. What for? It would have been just as dated on paper so why commission a new staging? The Life of Galileo, which is an uncharacterisitcally good show at the National these days, is helping to restore the National's reputation this summer. I really hope Hytner's Alchemist does the same this autumn because the place has being going to pot for the last three years (History Boys aside). - 217.196.231.33)
09 Aug 06
Oh dear, I hate leaving a theatre with the feeling of, well that was a shame, but that is exactly how I felt after sitting through this luke warm production of Shaffer's epic. Ok so the play is a tough one, sprawling from location to location with a vast array of characters and focus darting everywhere. The production was competent and in that I meant that it dealt with the plays problems and nothing was embaressing, but there was no heart to this production. The actors were competent but had no real gusto and the whole thing just seemed to drag. The moments of granduer such as the crossing of the mountain were done in an almost pysical theatre style which is a good idea but the coreography was patchy and some of the actors didnt have a clue what they were doing. The only reason I would recommend to see this is Patterson Joseph, he is extrodinary as the Inca God, he brings a majestical prescense to the stage and steals every scene he's in, an actor with extrodinary gifts. Other then that the experience was a dissapointing one. - 80.225.105.122)
30 Jul 06
Very underwhelming. Alun Armstrong took the option of grunting and barking rather than going through any genuine emotional journey. Paterson Joseph was doing well as the Inca King/God, but the nature of the part forces it to be a rather one note performance. Shaffer's play can be a little hollow at it's centre and Trevor Nunn's production has just thrown money at it rather than insight. - 62.31.40.29)
17 Jul 06
The Royal Hunt of the Sun - The Musical even though it has no songs - would be a more appropriate title for Trevor Nunn's flashy production! I couldn't wait to leave at the interval. What is happening at our beloved National Theatre - we had such a good run of shows until recently - then along came the dire Once in a Life Time, followed by this effort and rather like buses a third has come along with Market boy. Nick Hytner must be too tied up in NYC with the wonderful History Boys to have noticed - come on Nick get back home and take control before it's too late! - 195.93.21.105)
14 Jun 06
It's very, very long & looses its way several times. A lot of effort has gone into this production, trying to fill the large stage, on the basis of "never mind the quality, feel the width" but it just does not work. A great shame for the lost opportunity, why don't they have any quality controls?
Armstrong is not strong enough; I never thought that I would ever think that. He & the king as opposites do not work together, the king's accent & delivery are laughable as is a lot in this production.
The production values are paraded but the execution is poor, eg the collection of Peru's gold looks like something from a tired end-of-pier jaded version of a Blackpool panto Aladdin, just too much tat. How the cast keep their faces straight for most of the time, I don't know. I know that they should not laugh, but then the audience was. The standard of acting is variable but the overall impression is of everybody trying his or her best, unfortunately the outcome is pitiful.
This production seems to have got away from the director, like wilful children who are playing up because they have nothing better to do.
After the superb productions, eg of Coram Boy this is an insult& a sad waste of time. Please do not go, it only encourges them. I thought about asking for my money back but was constrained as I was on a group booking.
- 86.143.100.107)
06 Jun 06
The production is too long and could surely lose 15 minutes. The first half is the problem here because it drags until the army arrives at its destination. However, the second half brilliantly redeems the problems when the play concentrates on the central relationship which is riveting and magnficently played by Armstrong and Jospeh. The ending is deeply moving. However, I was puzzled as to why Joseph was required to or was directed to use a high-pitched robotic voice which, had the drama been less compelling, could have become very irritating. - 80.177.231.164)
15 May 06
It's a wonderful play, much of it historically and geographically factual. It concentrates on the relationship of two very different (though maybe not so different)men, Atahuallpa and Pizarro! It makes you care about them and maybe want to know more about the conquest of Peru. For me it conjured up all the necessary magic of theatre. Spectacular costumes and all those gold props were a wonder to see. Even if you don't enjoy this play its certainly worth visiting the Olivier Theatre. Its magnificent and on the night I went totally full!!! - 80.1.224.8)
12 May 06
I cannot understand why so many of the reviews on this site have been so negative. I found the play itself riveting and the acting mostly first-rate, especially that of Paterson Joseph. Alun Armstrong, perhaps, does not have quite the presence required for Pizarro, but he coped well with the difficult dialogue. As 'total theatre', this is well worth reviving and making an effort to see. - 213.122.14.52)
24 Apr 06
I agree I was really looking forward to seeing it but I left the theatre feeling disappointed. I think Nunn has to take some of the blame some parts of the production looked very dated, but perhaps it is because it just isn't a very good play? - 213.86.133.215)
20 Apr 06
I agree that this is ultimately a little disappointing. Partly, I think it's the fault of the play being dated, ironically, by the very thing that made it innovative at the time. Shaffer's commitment to what he has called "total theatre" involving mime etc are incorporated into the text rather than open for directorial interpretation. This approach has now become almost old hat and certainly physical theatre has moved on apace since the play's launch. Consequently, the first half, which must have been a stunning spectacle at the time, is now almost bland, and Nunn's use of strobe lighting rather serves to reinforce the 1960s/1970s feel. I also disliked his miking of actors, notably Malcolm Storry - not the actor's fault but the directors. The second half fares much better and was, for me, far more gripping. But I cannot help feeling that this play ought to be far more poingnant with its talk of religion, invasion and imperialism driven by commercialism. There is little intrinsically wrong with the production -but it comes over as a decent version of a good play when it was an opportunity for a highly relevant piece to hold up a mirror to our current times. Having said that, thanks to Travelex, for £10, it's a good way to spend 3 hours! - 62.255.32.15)
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.