Synopsis Osborne s domestic and political drama of hope and disillusionment is set in a lower middle class household in South London. The Elliots live their unhappy suburban life until Kate Elliot brings home a surrogate for her son killed in war, the charismatic and bohemian George Dillon. He is an aspiring actor and penniless writer recently freed from the constraints of employment, his fall cushioned by the kindness and generosity of Kate Elliot.
While Epitaph for George Dillon had its London premiere at the Royal Court in 1958, two years after Look Back in Anger, John Osborne actually wrote it – with his then collaborator Anthony Creighton – a year before the landmark play that made his name.
In this earlier ensemble-oriented piece, we’re confronted by an embryonic Jimmy Porter, the archetypal “angry young man”, in the title character. In fact, George Dillon is an even more thinly veiled version of Osborne himself: an aspiring actor-playwright embittered by the ongoing effort of ignoring his own failure (or continually waiting for success, depending on your outlook) and losing faith in his own ability. Is he truly afflicted with talent or only exhibiting symptoms of the disease?
George’s need to discover the answer to that question is allayed by the kindness of Kate Elliot, whose soldier son died in the war and who makes no bones about adopting the bohemian George as a surrogate. “I want you to feel that you are taking his place here,” Kate declares as she moves George into her kitschly suburban south London home (post-war period perfect design by John Gunter) and plies him with food, money and affection.
With supreme ingratitude, the lodger tears into his host family behind their backs, writing them off as caricatures – “if you put them on a stage, no one would take them seriously”. Ironically, though, it’s George, and his unrelenting assault on ‘bourgeois’ values and aspirations, who comes across as the most boring cliché here. Joseph Fiennes’ George clearly regards himself as a victim of society, reacting to perceived injustices with sneering sarcasm, snobbery and self-loathing, but he’s unable to inject Osborne’s anti-hero with enough compensatory charm to make us care about him, even when his physical ailments are revealed.
As Kate’s live-in, leftwing sister Ruth, Francesca Annis provides an intellectual and sexual sparring partner for George. And she does so with consummate grace and subtlety. We are the same kind, George tells Ruth, but Annis proves her character to be far nobler.
More engaging than George’s personal concerns or his dalliance with Ruth is his impact on the larger Elliot family dynamic. In the opening scene, as they await their guest’s arrival, there’s abundant humour in the playing out of rituals between doting but demanding Kate (a stand-out performance from the always excellent Anne Reid), her docile daughters Josie and Norah (Zoe Tapper and Dorothy Atkinson) and grumpy, newspaper-shielding husband (Geoffrey Hutchings). And throughout, there’s great poignancy in the acknowledgement of the family’s humble hopes – stealing away from the office five minutes early, getting a seat on the train, finding a beau.
Under the sympathetic direction of Peter Gill, himself a Royal Court veteran from the generation after Osborne, these details are lent even greater significance, with fluid scene transitions spotlighting isolated individual moments of day-to-day existence. Beautiful.
A play of exceptional quality and really deserving of the extremely loud round of applause from the audience (despite the auditorium being practically empty, what a shame)
The acting was the best I have seen in the West End. Francesca Annis and Joseph Fiennes were especially strong.
This is wonderful writing from John Osborne and Anthony Creighton brought to life superbly by Peter Gill and his team.
Go and see it while you can, I doubt you'll be disappointed. - 82.44.16.116)
11 Dec 05
There were some great performances, particularly Anne Reid. However, I don't think this play has aged well and the characters were impossible to engage with because they were so dislikable. - 195.93.21.102)
23 Nov 05
I found this really unsatisfying: there are so many great things about this - a fine cast, all of whom give faultless performances, and headed by two genuine star names who fully justify their billing...some cracking dialogue and social observations...a first class production by Peter Gill on an immaculate John Gunter set. The problem for me was the sheer unlikeability of the central character. Despite the considerable charm and talent of Joseph Fiennes, I found George Dillon himself so utterly devoid of redeeming features that I found myself pondering why we were all sitting there listening to his self-important, self-pitying, frequently nasty ramblings. Maybe this character is a dry run for Jimmy Porter but then I always wanted him to shut his fat gob as well! Still, this is actually a Rolls Royce piece of theatre in technical terms. I just wish I'd enjoyed it! - 195.82.123.181)
15 Oct 05
It is SO good to see drama of this quality in the West End. This is a fascinating play, well worth reviving. The first act is a bit slow, the second act is intriguing and the third act rocks. The sense of period is wonderful. The ensemble is perfect. I do hope the producers' risk pays off. Anyone with a serious interst in drama shouldn't hesitate to see this. Those of us lucky enough to attend the WOS outing benefited from a discussion with a most charming and welcoming cast. GO ! - 81.129.0.169)
05 Oct 05
Like a Mike Leigh play, the comedy masks the pathos of the characters' lives. George is human, full of faults and full of dreams, and I was shocked to see him buried alive in a suburban wasteland. All performances were excellent, but Joseph Fiennes and Francesca Annis glowed and brought their characters to painful birth. Wonderful and many thanks. - 195.93.21.101)
05 Oct 05
A very good 2 hours in the theatre and a great cast in which the big names are good but up and coming Zoe Tapper steals the show and is a real revelation. - 195.93.21.101)
Opened 15 Oct 1881, designed by Thomas Verity and originally gas lit. 780 seats. An Ambassadors theatre since 2000 and renamed The Harold Pinter Theatre in September 2011 in recognition of the wide range of Pinter's plays that the theatre has hosted.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.