Synopsis On the morning of his wife's twenty-first birthday, Lord Windermere gives her, as a token of his love, a beautiful present - a fan. However, she is to find out that her love is not as secure as she once believed. Who is the strange Mrs Erlynne and what is her husband's involvement with her? Within the structured confines of London 'society', Oscar Wilde creates a witty cartoon of morality and double standards. In twenty-four hours the happiness of Lard and Lady Windermere teeters on the precipice of scandal and disaster. Coloured with rakish young fops, innocent daughters, scheming mothers and bumbling gentlemen, lady Windermere's Fan is Oscar Wilde's classic comedy of manners, hidden identities and mistaken understandings.
It's a family affair at the Haymarket. Following Peter Hall's revival of The Royal Family, starring Judi Dench and assorted stage aristocracy, comes the director's revival of this Oscar Wilde classic, boasting yet more familial connections.
In Lady Windermere's Fan, we get two celebrity pairings for the price of one. Real-life mother and daughter Vanessa Redgrave and Joely Richardson play on-stage mother and daughter (though the latter remains, remarkably, unaware of the ties that bind) while real-life husband and wife Googie Withers and John McCallum play on-stage and fustified brother and sister.
In this Wildean comedy-drama-social satire, Richardson is the lady of the title, a Good Woman who misinterprets her husband's attentions and financial favours towards mysterious Bad Woman, Mrs Erlynne (Redgrave). By doing so, Lady W nearly repeats long-lost mum's big mistake of abandoning the marital home for a dashing lover and social exclusion. Her fan, a birthday present from hubby (David Yelland), becomes the prop by which she is almost ruined and then ultimately saved.
As Mrs Erlynne, Redgrave appears at first too bold and slightly wooden, but she warms to her character and her child in the second half, demonstrating her adeptness at pregnant pauses and letting small actions speak louder than words. Richardson is pretty, perky and visibly delicate as the innocent Lady, even if her moral outrage is harder to stomach.
The real stand-out performances, however, come in the smaller roles. Jack Davenport is wonderful as worldly but wounded Lord Darlington. During the play's most dramatic scene, in which he declares his love for Lady W, his desperation is heart-wrenching. Meanwhile, Withers as the busybody Duchess and McCallum as the hair-dyed and lisping Lord Augustus deliver comic value in spades.
At times, you yearn for Wilde's script to take an alternative dramatic turn but, hey, more than 100 years on, you can't really complain, and you can't help but marvel when some of the world's most famous epigrams pop out like unexpected jewels, more glittering in their original context. "We're all in the gutter but some of us are looking at the stars", a cynic is "a man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing" and many more - magnificent.
This production may leave some things to be desired - a smidgen of updating, more rehearsal time (on the night, there were a clutch of fluffed lines), less pastels and lace in the set (care of John Gunter in daytime TV mode) - but there's plenty here to satisfy too in an amusing, and at times genuinely moving, evening's entertainment.
Interesting direction, Richardson was a bit diffuse, Redgrave seemed like she was having a great time, Withers spoke much too hushed (I was sitting in the front row), but Davenport, Yelland and McCallum were all very good. Compelling score, nice set (enjoyed seeing what was going on behind the curtain). - USER: Whatsonstage.com
05 Jun 02
Absolutely apalling production although I can see why some people like it. Vanessa Redgrave and Joely Richardson both give 'star turns' - Richardson posing and pouting to the audience and Redgrave, well, I really don't know what she was doing - she just looked like she had dropped some serious drugs from beginning to end. Peter Hall's direction is non-existent. The is no continuity between the furniture on the set, yet alone the individual scenes and acts of the play. This is the most delicate and profound of Wilde's plays and deserves much more respect than anyone in this production gives it. All the subtleties of Wilde's language are lost (I swear Jack Davenport said "I can resist everything 'cept temptation") and Wilde's dark ending has been given a kind of Hollywood gloss which makes the audience leave dazed and confused. This is the second turkey in a row that Hall has directed at the Haymarket. Time to call it a day Peter? - USER: Whatsonstage.com
18 May 02
This was my first time seeing any of the actors on stage, and I went to both a Friday night and Sat matinee performance for comparison. The acting was superb by all cast members except the guy who played the Austrailian - one could barely HEAR him, and I was sitting on the front row both times! Vanessa Redgrave had such stage presence; her voice, her facial expressions, and her body language changed depending on the mood of the character she played. I went half expecting Joely Richardson to be bad in her role as all the reviews indicated that ahead of time. But I was delighted to be surprised at how good she was in the title role. As her character,she portrayed a sense of vulnerability, rage and gratitude as well as any seasoned actress I have seen. And the rest of the supporting cast, with the one exception, played their roles to the hilt, obviously enjoying it. The play was written as a comedy and the audience responded wholeheartedly both times with well deserved laughter and applause. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
08 May 02
Last night was my first visit to the beautiful Haymarket Theatre. It was also the first time ever to see Vanessa Redgrave live on stage! Wow. The woman could read an advertisment and sound great! Ms. Richardson did seem a little nervous and weak, a surprise since she had supposedly played the same role before in another production. The supporting cast were superb. Would recommend this now, but am sure it will only get better and better with a little more time under its belt. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
03 Mar 02
Did we all see the same play with the same cast? What I experienced was a lead cast that emoted to the max, with varying degrees of intensity, according to what the scene required. I thoroughly enjoyed it and would recommend it to anyone looking for an entertaining night out. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
03 Mar 02
Great play. Superb acting by the leads. Makes Wilde's play enjoyable and fun. Went to see it 2 nights in a row! - USER: Whatsonstage.com
03 Mar 02
I saw this show in Bath, before it arrived in the West End, and was shocked at just how bad a production this was. Only the supporting company were worth watching - the scene in Lord Darlington's room revived my spirits after the interval only to have them dashed as the mother and daughter team once again took the stage.
In a preview week one can forgive the odd fluffed line, but not a single line from either Richardson or Redgrave had the slightest hint of colour or emotion. It is said of some actors that 'they phoned in their performances' - but these guys sent them in by EMAIL!
One of my companions in Bath noted that Richardson had left RADA before graduating - "before they'd taught her to act, clearly" he continued. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
26 Feb 02
I saw this play last Saturday evening in a full house at the lovely Theatre Royal Haymarket who keep getting great casts for they plays and this one is no exception.
I really enjoyed all the performances and thought Joely and Vanessa were excellent especially there scenes together in the second act and Joely very beautiful and reminded me of Princess Di.
Googie Withers and John McCallum gave such wonderful performances too as did Claire Swinburne and Jack Davenport.
The set is a bit sparse but colourful and the costumes are incredible.
I had a nice evening and from the great applause at the end so did everyone else. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
26 Feb 02
Its ironic that the two people whos names are being used to sell the show, give the worst perofmances ive EVER seen on a london stage. Joely Richardson looks great but cant act to save her life, Her Mother meanwhile has no stage presence, acting ability, shes also miscast, and says the lines in one bored tone of voice. Nice set though - USER: Whatsonstage.com
26 Feb 02
Went to see this last night- and what a huge dissapointment. I think that Peter Hall has lost his directing genius and instead is a master of putting ion shows with enticing casts then letting them flounder- (royal family). I saw VR in The Cherry Orchard at the NT a few years ago and was shocked at how awful she was- saying all lines in the same bored tone and acting very wooden. But i thought maybe she was just having an off day....but oh no- here she is again, giving such a bad performance that i felt embarrased for the supporting cast who were far superior. Her Daughter was terrible too- wooden and concentrating on saying the lines rather than feeling them. Its outragsous that the show should be sold on them, considering how dreadful they both are. Thank god for a great set, and googie withers and jack davenport who stop the show from being a laughing stock - USER: Whatsonstage.com
Opened 29 Dec 1720. Closed in 1737 (partly for attacking the government), re-opened 1747. The current theatre opened on 4th July 1821 and was designed by Nash. The last theatre in London to use candles (1837). 888 seats. Society of London Theatre member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.