Synopsis Leader of the Lost Boys on the island of Neverland, Peter makes regular visits to the real world where he befriends the Darling children - Wendy and her brothers, John and Michael - and takes them from London to Neverland for a series of fabulous adventures. Sung and spoken in Spanish with English sur-titles.
We do lots of Lorca in English, so I don’t see why we shouldn’t see what Peter Pan looks like in Spanish. Unfortunately, Peter Pan: El Musical is merely one ’ell of a bad musical that should have stayed in Benidorm or Tenerife. This too long one-month season at the Garrick marks the end of a five-year tour, for which relief, I think I can confidently say on behalf of you all, “muchas gracias.”
There’s a joke buried in the pitiful patter of piratical Smee (Pedro Espadas, an actor who, judging by the suave manner of his curtain call, is accustomed to better than my rudeness), about English expats in that beautiful country.
One thing I do know they don’t get there is decent musical theatre. It’s none of my business, really, but it seems very sad that Max Weitzenhoffer and Nica Burns, owners of the Garrick, should hire out their premises for what is basically amateur night on the Costa del Sol.
The scenery wobbles, and so do most of the mermaids in the blue lagoon, who wear fin feet and fun bras and prove, as they flop around the cardboard rockery, that fins really ain’t what they used to be. The cache of Lost Boys, or “ninos perdidos”, are refugees from some sort of rubbish Iberian production of Cats, clinging to their furry bits like crazy.
We are too spoilt by the recent reclamation in our theatre by Trevor Nunn and John Caird of J M Barrie’s masterpiece. But why have an el cheapo Spanish version, in April, in the West End? Captain Hook, played by Miguel Angel Gamero, “Spain’s leading musical theatre star”, the programme says - which is a bit like saying “England’s leading baseball player” – is not even good, or indeed bad, enough to get booed.
Peter himself is athletically played, almost to the point of exhaustion, by Miguel Antelo, but his style is that of a desperate, arms-akimbo anxiety to please that went out of fashion with the London Transport Players 20 years ago. The rest of the cast follow suit, gooning like the Grumbleweeds in a downmarket summer show in Great Yarmouth. All aboard, they cry, the “Ole, Rioja!”
Or was that the Jolly Roger? Still, one is always glad to reassert one’s belief in fairies, even by standing up and singing in Spanish. Unlike the old lady in Candide, however, I did not actually feel “suddenly Spanish.” If anything, I felt suddenly Danish; which is why I may have looked so pastry-faced at the end of a very irritating show. Tinkerbell, that tiresome little fairy, is represented early on by a horrid green laser light show that makes the Richmond annual pantomime look thrillingly avant-garde.
There are some limber Indians prancing around Tiger Lily and they do a Stomp-style tribal number with luminous sticks. Most of the songs are Eurovision pop pap with ghastly key changes and an awful sound system, which has a sort of invasive metallic layer over it, coming at you through two ugly big speakers on the stage. And no, I’m certainly not going to say who they are.
I thought it was really good fun. The audience participation part worked really well. It's more pantomime than musical theatre, but overall very entertaining and it has a very good cast. - Dennis
26 Apr 08
I believed Peter Pan El Musical was just below the standards for a normal west end show - besides the shoddy out of time surtitles and the echoing of the cast's families at the back of the audience "wotting" and hushing their children - the production proved to be minimal and "hum-drum" entertainment - with euro pop songs and relative panto acting traits including screaming "Hay que creer en hadas" repeativly in order to get Tink back to life. This didn't remind me of a evening of theatre and more of a Biggen's Hackney Panto. Furthermore, its filled with many "its behind you moments" and the most miserable and unpleasant front of house staff i have experienced (perhaps the production is getting to them) - on the plus side I only paid £17.00 for a ticket and it's OK to watch once, but thank goodness its only got 36 performances in total. Lets hope the magic of Darren Brown can return the huge loss that the Garrick has experienced as a result of this production. - Daryl
21 Apr 08
This is not the awful production some critics have described. The performance I attended was quite fun. It was matinee so there were lots of children in the audience who were having a great time specially with the audience participation parts, they were quite happy to be picked up to become lost boys. The music is not memeorable but the cast have good voices and they try hard. The best were Peter, Wendy and the narrator. It was a very entertaining afternoon. - natalie
20 Apr 08
I thought "Peter Pan - El Musical" was good fun. Ok, not a fantastic production but it's not worst than Joseph which looks much more cheap and tacky. The music is cheesy but catchy. I think some people are prejudiced just because it's perform in a foreign language. - Pippa
15 Apr 08
I am from Barcelona, and I can assure you that there are fantastic productions of musical theatre here, and "Peter Pan - El Musical" is not one of these fantastic productions we have. When I noticed that this musical was scheduled to go to the West End I coudn't believe it! Really, it's a bad, very bad production. Maybe in certains places of Spain, where people has never had the change to see a musical, this show may have been a success, even I really doubt that. It was absolutely not the case in Barcelona, and of course neither in London! - Pep
02 Apr 08
I haven't see the show, but having read today's reviews, I am tempted. It seems this show could very quickly become a must-see!
Neal - Neal
02 Apr 08
It's quite poor in general but it has some fun moments. It's cheap and tacky but not as bad as the current production of Joseph. Some of the tunes are actually quite catchy. - Ilsa
01 Apr 08
Well, Eurovision has come early and it's just an elongated Spanish entry! Who on earth decided to bring this Am Dram show to London? The sets are tacky, the music is bland europop,the choreography-by-numbers is straight out of a pop video and the attempts at bi-lingual audience participation are excruciating. Are there enough Spanish ex-pat theatregoers in London to allow it to survivie the month - or will they bring in a simultaneous translation by Terry Wogan and send themselves up? - GarGar
Opened on 24 Apr 1889, funded by W.S. Gilbert. 675 seats. Bought from Andrew Lloyd Webber and now owned by Broadway producer Max Weitzenhoffer and Nica Burns.Society of London Theatre member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.