Synopsis It's London, 1726, and Mrs Tull's got problems. The whores are giving her a hard time, a man in a dress is looking for a job, her husband has a roving eye, and the apprentice boy keeps disappearing on midnight walks. Meanwhile in 2001, a group of wealthy gay men are preparing for a raunchy party. Mother Clap's Molly House, a black comedy with songs, is a celebration of of the diversity of human sexuality, an exploration of our need to form families, and a fascinating insight into a hidden chapter in London's history. Please note - Contains language and scenes which some people may find offensive.
Note: This review dates from September 2001 and the production's original run at the National Theatre.
The stage safety curtain depicting London circa 1720, might have caused some wry glances on press night. Fleet Street running like a tunnel through the map has a proximity to the action of Mark Ravenhill's sordid drama that should have raised nostalgic smiles.
Holborn, nearly three hundred years ago, hosted one of the city's gay brothels. Ravenhill's play charts the possible dark beginnings of this venture, from a dress shop frequented by whores to a molly house stuffed with camp eccentrics. With an Elizabethan flourish, Mother Clap opens onto a setting which makes one wonder if an Oliver revival has been double-booked. Mops, buckets, mucky frills and peeking London steeples loom over Mrs Tull and her lustful husband.
However, before you can shout 'Gorblimey', the said husband is tucked up in his coffin, having snuffed it through a mixture of guilt and desire. This leaves Mrs Tull and her 'wandering' apprentice to start anew. The apprentice's innocent wanderings, however, are soon revealed to be walkabouts in search of male bonding. Which all leads to a fair bit of cross-dressing with Mrs Tull's fancy frocks, and a whole new enterprise in sight.
Part two of the action leads us into the present day, via a modern A-Z screen map with a yellow post-it stuck on. The puff as pimp, voyeur, total tosser and shagaround is portrayed as a group of gay men indulge in an orgy 2001-style. The contrast is derisory, and adds nothing to our tolerance, appreciation or enjoyment of gay lifestyle as a determined sub-culture. Laughable simulated sex is acted out with all the erotic charge of a pre-watershed TV fumble. It's a mercy when Mother Tull/Clap and her medieval babes reappear, but by now all semblance of a plot has been drowned.
Music remains central to the drama, and the creative team has conjured up some wickedly good stuff. Part narrative, bawdy ballad and queeny madrigal, it justifies Ravenhill's choice to inject proceedings with appropriate ditties. There's also a sturdy and thoughtful cast on show, with wonderful Deborah Findlay staggered somewhere between Eliza Dolittle's flattened vowels and Mrs Merton's rueful impudence.
However, as a history lesson this must go down as a wasted chance. The real outcome of Mother Clap's meddling and peddling resulted in the house being raided and one man hung for sodomy. How much more of an explosive drama this scenario might have made. A body swinging on the gibbet, pelted by a mocking crowd, was the ultimate reality of Holborn's molly house. Yet Ravenhill's music-hall celebration, admirable for its defiance, leaves you half-expecting The Two Ronnies to waltz in and add a swelling chorus.
Presented with deft precision it may be, but Mother Clap neither illuminates the past nor haunts the contemporary with satisfaction. Too soft by half on history, it lets the 1720s off with hardly a wagged finger. Its comment on the present day, whichever way you read it, has hardly moved Ravenhill's work forward and could leave him dangerously ghettoised. By all means write about homosexuality above homophobia, but presented this way it complicates the former and encourages the latter.
I went on the first Saturday at the Aldwych and then on a Wednesday a few weeks ago and the Wednesday was pretty full, and the audience loved it.
It has its flaws (mainly Act II), but I did enjoy this show very much
- USER: Whatsonstage.com
11 Mar 02
I saw it at the NT and thought it was just appaling. Devoid of any wit or intelligence. Mark Ravenhill is a dumb writer. The (wonderful) cast did what they could with it, but it is still truly awful. Since it moved to the aldwych- its been near empty EVERY night- including saturdays...even the other bad shows in town are packed on a saturday night - USER: Whatsonstage.com
11 Mar 02
I saw this at the NT and enjoyed it-although I enjoyed the first half more than the second.I didn't find the content at all shocking, in fact I thought the simulated sex was pretty dull! I think it would have been better to stick with the historical "Molly House" story,which was interesting and funny,rather than try and be clever and update things for the 20th century. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
11 Mar 02
Nowhere near as bad as you may think. The performances are spirited and lift it at times when the story flags. The play sets out to shock but ultimately is so funny and enjoyable that you leave the theatre having had a good time. Get a ticket and see for yourself.
This play should not have empty stalls. I have seen far worse plays do better.
- USER: Whatsonstage.com
11 Mar 02
I saw this at the National and reported then what I enjoyed/did not enjoy about this show.
I liked the musical excerpts and would have preferred to have seen more of this than the over-doing of the sexual act on stage. This show would have been better if they had toned it down more than just a little.
I can understand why the theatre would have been half empty.
- USER: Whatsonstage.com
10 Mar 02
I saw this last week and just thought i'd post how good I thought it was. The content was not in the least bit shocking or offensive because it was appropriate and needed in order for the storyline to be believeable and draw the audience in. I thought the show was amusing and really fun to watch aswel as being quite moving at times. I also felt that there were characters I really cared for and the fact that it's based on real events made it all the more interesting. Was fun reading the little extracts from the court case in the programme. The cast were all fantastic and showed great diversity of acting skills in the swapping to different time periods. It was a great pity that the theatre was pretty empty but all the audience seemed to be loving it. I think if people stopped worrying about the ''shockin content'' and gave the show a chance they would actually enjoy it. I recommend it and would go again! Mariam. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
10 Mar 02
Great show! - USER: Whatsonstage.com
13 Feb 02
I saw it at Bath and thought it one of the most enjoyable evenings in the theatre for a long time. It avoided the usual obvious stereotypes [including the one advocated by the WOS critic - come on not that old-hat again]. Forget these moans of the misery-guts - get out there, let your stays out, and just enjoy yourself for a change. And yes, I did care - the quality of the acting was superb. The script was refreshing - perhaps just because it doesn't fit the socio-political agenda of some Londoners - USER: Whatsonstage.com
12 Feb 02
Saw this at the National and can't believe it is moving to the Aldwych (albeit for six weeks only). It is a completely uninvolving work (you don't care about the characters at any point) accompanied by a dreadful "Theatre music" score. And yet the subject matter that inspired it is fascinating. Mark Ravenhill has really f****d up with this one. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.