Synopsis Condemned to death, Mary Queen of Scots has been held prisoner for nineteen years. Can her cousin Elizabeth 1st be seen to carry out the sentence? Dare she not carry it out? In the crisp air of the park around Fotheringay Castle the two women meet...
For anyone afraid of the continuing dumbing down of the West End, there are, at least, a few welcome signs of intelligent life left: having begun the year with the transfer of the Sheffield Crucible production of Schiller's Don Carlos to the Gielgud, there's now a second Schiller on Shaftesbury Avenue this year with the deserved transfer of the Donmar Warehouse's summer revival of Mary Stuart to the Apollo.
And even if a little of the close-up intensity that the Donmar can uniquely provide is lost, the production now has a head-on, full-on drive that the Donmar can also threaten to dissipate by its three-sided configuration. Now, the entire audience is focused in the same direction; and the stage is laid clear, with a stark simplicity in Anthony Ward's pared-back design, to simply drive this drama relentlessly forward. (This also includes the now usual homage to the Donmar's own physical space, with the meticulous recreation of the theatre's own back wall that is also currently being referenced in Michael Grandage's Donmar-in-the-West-End staging of Guys and Dolls).
While this still remains very much the Janet McTeer and Harriet Walter show - and how amazing it is to watch these two queens of the stage as well as their kingdoms battling for pride and supremacy over each other - the company has solidified around them with superb performances all around, with newcomers like June Watson (replacing Barbara Jefford as Mary's nurse and loyal confidant), Michael Simkins (substituting for James Fleet as Mary's Guardian, Sir Amias Paulet) and Paul Jesson (taking over from David Burke as the Earl of Shrewsbury), integrating seamlessly with them.
It remains unmissable.
- Mark Shenton
Note: The following FIVE-STAR review dates from July 2005 and this production's earlier run at the Donmar Warehouse.
It is fast turning into Friedrich Schiller's year. The critical and box office triumph of the 18th-century German playwright's Don Carlos, in a production directed by Donmar Warehouse artistic director Michael Grandage that transferred from Sheffield's Crucible (which he was also running at the time) to the West End's Gielgud Theatre, set the bar high already.
Now Grandage's Donmar raises the stakes higher still, with a production of revelatory intensity and stunning theatrical power of Schiller's Mary Stuart. Directed by Phyllida Lloyd with a hurtling sense of politics and passion, it forensically observes how the power balances are constantly being shifted between a pair of opposing Queens and their respective courtiers and followers.
While Don Carlos offered a blistering opportunity for actors - including Richard Coyle in the title role and Derek Jacobi as the estranged father with which he effected a castastrophic reunion - to shine, now it’s the ladies’ turn. Three of our very finest stage actresses lead this play's bleak journey of dark court conspiracies, betrayals, deceptions and failed reconciliations with a ferocious dynamism and searching intelligence.
The Catholic Mary, Queen of Scots - having allowed, she admits, her husband to be lured to his death - flees to England, where she’s taken prisoner and now stands accused of conspiracy to plot the overthrow of Elizabeth, the protestant Queen of England. "I came here demanding the sacred right of asylum, threw myself into the arms of my royal cousin, but instead of protection was given prison", Mary tells the Lord High Treasurer when he comes to deliver the judgement made against her, by 40 votes to two, that she stands in breach of a new law framed specifically to condemn her.
You can't help but think of the contemporary resonances of the world of modern asylum seekers, who have brought their own religious convictions with them here but even now are being accused of fomenting dissent and threatening national security so that new laws are being drafted to invoke against them.
But though Peter Oswald's fierce and passionate new version of the play - part poetry, part prose - might suggest such comparisons, it is at its heart the story of the ever-shifting politics of power between two women born to high office, wrestling with their private demons against a need to keep public face. In fact, Mary and Elizabeth never met in real life; but Schiller stage-manages a brilliant third act confrontation that’s utterly combustible.
It is epic stuff, Shakespearean in its twisting conspiracies and Greek in its tragic inevitability, but entirely its own as a drama of personal as well as state politics. Here, the two opposing royals - Janet McTeer (pictured) as the imprisoned, impassioned Mary (with a certainty that right, religion and inheritance are on her side) and Harriet Walter as Elizabeth, clinging desperately to power but full of insecurity - are laid out with an electrifying, minutely calibrated tension. They are, respectively, startling and mesmerising to watch.
But so is the third woman of the company, the always-astonishing Barbara Jefford as Mary's nurse and confidante, Kennedy, bringing a human tenderness and stoicism to her beloved's fate that’s heartbreaking. Amongst the superb ensemble of men variously taking sides as advisers and adversaries, there are particularly resonant performances from Rory Kinnear as Mortimer, an invented character who plots for Mary's escape; Guy Henry who conspires (literally) to be on both sides; and David Horovitch and Rufus Wright as officers of state with their own uncomfortable duties to discharge.
What a brilliant production. The acting was superb and the script was gripping. Both Harriet Walter and Janet McTeer deserve awards as they played their roles to perfection. The opening of Act 2 with the rain was excellent and the use of lighting against the bare set helped set the scene. I recommend this to all lovers of fine drama. GO SEE IT!!! - 217.36.96.101)
13 Dec 05
Caught this outstanding piece of theatre at the Apollo, shortly before the official opening. This Yank loved it: the outstanding performances from actors too seldom seen here in NYC, and the juxtaposition of present-day "supporting cast" and 16th century rulers. That not only contrasted the reversal of sex roles; it highlighted the century-spanning conflicts and challenges governing heads (excuse the expression) must face. As to its manipulation of history, the audience for this play is well aware that these Queens never met and I am sure can place the licenses taken in context. - 64.69.124.130)
01 Dec 05
I enjoyed it but thought it took a lot of liberties with the true facts of the story. Mary was portrayed here as much younger than she was when she died - in fact, Mary was a plumpish (ooh matron type) figure complete with grey hair poking out from her wig. Apparently when the executioner held her head aloft, her old grey head fell from the wig he was clutching and bounced off the scaffold. Apparently it caused a terrible to do and the front row wanted their money back. I wasn't there - but it wasn't pretty. Mary was not the seductive siren we see in the play displaying her wares. Also she was no oil painting - I've seen an oil painting of her to prove it. She had a pointy nose and a double chin. She wasn't all that. - 194.193.78.115)
24 Nov 05
PROS: performances, performances, performances. Janet McTeer's tragic Mary blew me away even more than her Nora and her Duchess (God, how I adore this actress), Harriet Walter's Thatcher-tinged Elizabeth froze my blood, Guy Henry's duplicitous Leicester impressed me no end and June Watson's wracked old Nurse broke my heart. (What a wonderful actress she is. Why is she not a huge star?)
CON 1: Phyllida Lloyd's direction, though tight enough, was flat and unimaginative. The production seems driven more by its great performances than great direction - although I'm sure Lloyd's hand must have been in there somewhere. It's the lack of any visual concept that disappointed me most: design was spare to the point of dull, and in ensemble scenes Lloyd's predilection for symmetrical stage blocking (occasioned by its transfer from the Donmar to a prosc arch stage?) was often clunky and amateurish.
CON 2: Amid all the great performances there was another scenery-chewing-by-numbers turn from Rory Kinnear. Honestly, after Taming/Tamer and Festen his career could do without being pigeon-holed into this third neurotic splutterer. (I missed him in Hamlet; how was he there?) His agent needs to find him a placid introvert to play next or else his credibility's going to plummet. - 82.34.196.150)
27 Oct 05
I've hardly ever given a five-star rating on this website - but I'm more than happy to make an exception for 'Mary Stuart'. You know when you've been in the presence of quality acting... and believe me, this is quality of the highest standard. Janet McTeer and Harriet Walter are incredible - and Guy Henry is also fantastic. This deserves to be as successful, if not more, than 'Don Carlos'. Highly recommended. - 84.9.19.112)
25 Oct 05
Quite simply, it's productions like this that make theatre special. Very eloquently, and without fuss or fanfare, this production (seen last night at the Apollo Theatre)is best summed up as a good story, well told. What more could you want from an evening at the theatre? All the requisite ingredients are here - drama, suspense, intrigue, humour, romance - and presented in such a way as to make the political intrigues of the Elizabethan court accessible and credible, not to mention gripping. I was strongly reminded of the excellent BBC serial "House of Cards".
The staging and costuming, no doubt looked on by some as "minimalist" and by others as "gimmicky", in fact helps to clearly define each character and allows the audience to grasp the story from the start, without getting confused as to who's who!
Every character here, no matter how large or small, has their moment, and the cast is uniformly excellent - Two understudies played at this performance, and I was none the wiser till after the show.
Well judged use of lighting, audio and stage effects again enhance, rather than distract. - 195.92.40.49)
18 Oct 05
Saw this last night, and can't stop thinking about it. An absolute tour de force, with remarkable acting from Janet McTeer and Harriet Walter. Supporting cast also excellent, wonderful thought-provoking, emotional play. - 86.137.51.182)
14 Oct 05
After the brilliant reviews that this production recieved when it was at the Donmar, I thought it was great when I heard it was transferring to the West End.
But when I saw it, I was a little disppointed. From the beginning something about the production didn’t feel quite right, though at first it was hard to place. It was a great production - the set was nice and simple, the costumes were good (the Queen's in 16th century clothing, emphasising the fact that they were both prisoners - Mary literally, and Elizabeth, being a woman in a male dominated court).
The cast are all excellent, their acting un-faultable, especially Janet McTeer, great performance. But unlike in ‘Don Carlos’ I didn't feel anything for any of the characters. In 'Don Carlos' you really loathed the King, felt sympathy for his wife and pitied Carlos. I didn't feel that this production engaged the audience as well as it could have done.
I think the reason for this is the script...? I have ruled everything else out, the rest of it was a great production that I cannot fault. The language in the script has been updated (it being a new version, rather than a translation)...the modernised language - I felt - didn't quite fit with the period in which the play is set.
Also, the upper circle of the Apollo Theatre is rubbish. I could not see 3/4 of the stage, and the leg room is minimal, which didn't help :o( - 194.80.240.66)
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.