Synopsis Mahler's Conversion deals with a professional and moral dilemma of anti-semitism. Gustav Mahler (1860-1911) desperately wants to secure the top job in the musical world of Vienna, conductor of the Court Opera. But Mahler is a Jew, and to achieve his ambition, he must convert to Catholicism. He may be willing, but there's a bigger price to pay.
Two main obstacles must have faced Ronald Harwood when preparing material on Gustav Mahler for the stage. Firstly, how to portray the grand sweep of a composer's career without the full battalion of an orchestra arrayed on stage. Secondly, how to interest a contemporary audience in the fate of an artist who was cold-shouldered for much of his lifetime, and is still met with indifferent shrugs by many classical luminaries today.
Harwood overcomes the first by injecting brief blasts of Mahler's work into the constant stream of scene changes. Whether or not he has surmounted the second challenge must remain a matter of opinion, although a dazzling cast do their level best with the fleshy and feisty material on offer.
When we first meet Mahler, depicted with typical dexterity by Antony Sher, he is struggling with matters of conscience and conversion. A top composer's job in the Vienna Court awaits him if he can be persuaded to deny his Jewish ancestry and convert to Catholicism. Nickolas Grace, suave and dazzling as Siegfried Lipiner, informs us that intrigue has displaced coffee as Vienna's favoured beverage. 'Mocha has been replaced by Mahler,' he informs the assembled aesthetes with glee.
However, Mahler's beliefs seem to confound him as much as the puzzled priest who is sent to convert him. Sher, his voice almost constricted with the emotion of Mahler's rampantly vibrant persona, rages and wrestles with life as its demands on him increase. All the while, Stephen Brimson Lewis' intriguing setting demands a case study all if its own. A black leather couch waits by, as if to cater for Mahler's sexual promiscuity or invite him down for analysis as a tormented patient.
Indeed, it comes as no real surprise when Sigmund Freud makes a notable cameo in the assured hands of Gary Waldhorn. This provides the longest scene of the night, amid a bustle of shorter scenarios which eventually offer too many possibilities. How much more insightful Harwood could have been by just homing in on one particular chapter of Mahler's life and giving it the full cross-examination.
Sher's performance is predictably potent, with the full range of gestures, inflections and accents well in command. He reveals a man made ecstatic by wild creation and ultimately laid low by the folly of love. But you wind up asking whether Harwood intends you to sympathise or empathise with his protagonist - or even to despise him.
Theories and ideologies rain on the audience throughout as if the author intends to conduct a storm of knowledge from the heavens. And rather too many orchestral manoeuvres in the Aldwych dark leave this symphony somewhat in need of greater harmony.
I saw the play in Guildford and at the Aldwych. I thought that Sir Antony Sher was absolutely brilliant; his characterization was superb. The scene between Mahler and Freud was exceptional: two performers holding the audience's attention purely through their acting, with minimal props. It's a shame the critics couldn't give this new piece of writing the support it deserved. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
01 Nov 01
Although it has just been announced that Mahler’s Conversion is to close after only a month, there is an element of disappointment when so much effort has gone into a production and so great an opportunity has been missed.
Harwood’s play begs the question - Why tackle this subject when nothing is gleaned from Mahler’s dilemma. Indeed we get precious little insight into Mahler’s career at the time of his conversion.
Sher’s performance is convincing as a musical theorist but little else. There is certainly no sense of the passion a composer has for his music. At one point when he is pacing the stage, cigar in hand and dressed in evening wear, this particular member of the audience couldn’t have been the first to think of Groucho Marx.
Stephen Brimson Lewis’ stage design is definitely worth a mention with turn of the (last) century operatic lushness for Vienna interiors and impressionist colours during the confrontation with Freud. As for Gary Waldhorn, his dim, but holy catholic priest was a refreshing change from David Horton in the Vicar of Dibly, but unconvincing to then see him pop up as Sigmund Freud – (in the West End with so many out of work actors, do we have to have actors doubling up) And Nickolas Grace whose talents I have yet seen matched after appearing as Pangloss in Scottish Opera’s Candide was not well served in his character Siegried Lipiner. There seems little doubt that if this play had not had Ronald Harwood as author, it would not have seen the light of day.
- USER: Whatsonstage.com
17 Oct 01
Yet another fine collaboration between Antony Sher and the director, Gregory Doran. The play does require a lot of concentration as it explores Mahler's reasons for converting to catholicism, though this is eased by the profoundly beautiful excerpts of music played. The scene with Sigmund Freud (Gary Waldhorn) towards the end is riveting, and Antony sher as Mahler is magnificent. His emotional intensity is gripping and his stage presence magnetic. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
08 Oct 01
I was at the Whatsonstage outing too. It's weird, but i felt I got a lot more out of it going in the group, because there was a lot of discussion afterwards which I don't get when I've got to drag my partner or a friend along. Regarding the play itself, I thought it was so-so: started strong but went off the rails a bit in Act ii. Very strong performances, though I would have liked more Sher stage-time. The lighting was good and so was the music. I've got to play my CD now so I can familiarise myself more with Mahler's work. Many thanks Whatsonstage and all the people from the play who joined us afterwards. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
01 Oct 01
My comments are in two parts. First, as far as the play itself goes, I rather enjoyed the performance. I felt the roles to be strong, script to be entertaining and the lighting to be quite artfully planned. My second comment is in regards to the Whatsonstage.com event as a whole - a good critical mass was gathered for lively discussion of the play, including several of the play's crew. I felt that I got value for money and heartily recommend any of their future events. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
01 Oct 01
Very impressive and accurate script, delivered superbly by the cast but staging just too 'theatrical' to be able to focus totally.
Anthony Sher was true to form but clearly this was not his most challenging role. Unfortunately, there was insufficient difference in Gary Waldhorn's portrayals of the priest in Act One and Freud in Act Two. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
24 Sep 01
Brilliant. The acting is superb.
Saw the play at Guildford. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
24 Sep 01
Brilliant. The acting is superb.
Saw the play at Guildford. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.