Synopsis When the Duke of Vienna appoints a Deputy, Angelo, to administer the city on his behalf while he travels abroad, he does not foresee Angelo's near-fanatical observation of the letter of the law. The first victim of the new regime is Claudio, a young nobleman who has made his fiancee pregnant, an offence punishable by death. His cause is put forward by a number of citizens who beg on his behalf for mercy, but Angelo, declaring that he is ready to be judged by the same high standards that he expects from others, insists that justice can allow no exceptions. That is, however, until he meets Isabella, Claudio's virtuous sister. The seemingly moral Angelo offers her brother's life in return for her virginity, but when she agrees, Angelo breaks his promise to free Claudio. Part of the Travelex £10 Season
Dates: Opens 27 May 2004. May 17,18,19,20,21,22,24,25,26,28,29,31, Jun 1,2,9,10,11,12,14,15,16, Jul 15,16,17,22,23,24,29,30,31 at 19:30. May 27 19:00. May 22,29, Jun 1,12,15, Jul 15,17,24,31 Mats 14:00
The joint Complicite/National Theatre production returns to the South Bank after a brief tour and with a change of cast. While the production retains some of its power, it is perhaps less of a nightmare vision.
First and foremost, the part of the Duke is being played by the director, Simon McBurney rather than David Troughton – a change that is really not for the better; McBurney plays the Duke as a well-meaning, bumbling old stick without any of the sense of hidden menace that Troughton brought to the role. In particular, the ending, where Isaballa is just as much in danger of being sexually subdued by him as by Angelo, loses a lot of its power.
However, the introduction of a new Angelo, Angus Wright, is more felicitous. Like his predecessor, Paul Rhys, Wright is almost sickened by the sexual yearnings aroused in him by Isabella. But in Wright, a long-legged gaunt figure, we can see how his longings are corrupting his very body – his anguished twisting and squirming is evocative of his torment – his self-mutilation becomes almost understandable.
This time round, Naomi Frederick’s Isabella (the part is played by the same actor) is less sexually-knowing. In the previous production, there was the sense that she was at least vaguely aware of the effect that she was having on Angelo, the real danger being that she wasn’t aware how much. This time, there’s less of a sense of this – and when Angelo uses the razor with which he has been mutilating himself to slash her bra, there is much more a feeling of sexual danger – it’s the most powerful scene of the production and a reminder of how desire pervades every part of the city.
But many of the aspects of the production that I found profoundly irritating remain: the over-use of sound effects – do we really need to hear a baby crying because the word ‘child’ appears in the text? - the glib references to the middle-east wars, the pervasiveness of video, the over-use of Mahler’s music (because it’s set in Vienna, geddit?). There’s no doubt that McBurney has delivered a powerful vision of how sexual desire can be a corrupting and corrosive influence – it’s just the execution of the vision that’s at fault.
- Maxwell Cooter
Note: The following FOUR-STAR review dates from May 2004 and this production's earlier run.
Simon McBurney's Complicité tackle one of Shakespeare's strangest plays, one that is rarely performed and yet which has a lot for modern audiences to appreciate.
We can nod smugly about the play's setting in Vienna, Freud's city, as sexual desire (and its twin, sexual repression) is at the heart of the play (there's much use of Mahler's music to remind us). The novice Isabella is faced with the choice of either surrendering her virginity to Angelo to save her brother, or, by remaining chaste, let him die.
This is a nicely played Isabella from Naomi Frederick. Too often, this is a character who comes across as a first-class prig. This is a too human Isabella well in touch with her own body, when she tells Angelo to "go to your bosom", she holds her own breast for emphasis - one suspects that she is well aware of what she is doing to Angelo's fragile libido.
One of the key questions of the play is, 'how good is the Duke'? He rights the wrongs that Angelo has wrought but he is also a liar, a meddler and a control freak. McBurney takes it one stage further though. In a quite startling ending, not the usual 'happy' one, he reveals that the Duke and Angelo are of the same kidney and poor Isabella, like a de Sade heroine is about to find that her rescuer is not all that he seemed.
David Troughton is a commanding presence as the Duke. He speaks Shakespeare beautifully but there's always a hint of darkness in his voice. Paul Rhys' Angelo is a tortured man, a carnival of twitches and grimaces, literally twisting himself in throes of sexual denial. In the Elbow court scene, he literally washes his hands, as if it rid himself of the stench of the brothel. But, I can't help feeling that it's a bit over-played; Angelo's concupiscence should be in stark contrast to his stern rectitude; here he's too much of an obvious fruitcake.
There's some good support from Mike Grady's Escalus, the bureaucrat with a conscience and from Richard Katz's boastful Pompey. And there's a nice cameo too from Kostas Philippoglou's frantic constable.
It doesn't get off to the most promising of starts. The word pirate cues an image of George Bush on the video screen (an empty gesture that his little relevance to the rest of the staging) and there are some unnecessary sound effects - the word 'prison' elicits the sound of a door clanging, for example. McBurney is also over-fond of on-stage mikes, and sometimes the sound is horribly amplified. In the scene where Angelo learns of the Duke's return to Vienna, nearly all his words are lost.
But the simplicity of the telling wins out. It's played for two and a quarter hours, without an interval, and in truth, time flies by. It's a compelling retelling of the story and it will be fascinating to compare this to the Globe's forthcoming production.
I found this production highly confusing and i missed the end as i was nearly asleep! I liked the contempory feel yet it became like a tv show rather then a theatre production - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.249.155.233)
22 Jun 04
Expensive, time consuming, confusing and morally degrading. But some good performances, Pompey he make me laugh. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.249.155.233)
22 Jun 04
A gripping evening. This tremendous production shows how Shakespeare can be played in a contempary way. I didn't know the play, but found all the performances well fleshed out, especially Isabella, who I found fascinating to watch. There's a fabulously sinister atmosphere to a lot of it, thanks to the background music. I had no problems hearing any words except in the opening scene. Highly recommended. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.113.17.219)
15 Jun 04
I thought this Measure fell slightly the wrong side of tricksy (not just the excessive use of TV sets, but the mikes, the prison noises, etc) but I did enjoy it and found the emphasis on sex and passion appropriate. I also liked Paul Rhys. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.69.37.108)
02 Jun 04
I disagree that superficial directorial flourishes have won people over. If they're like me, they have been won over by an entertaining production that brings out the somewhat sinister aspects of this odd play, especially through David Troughton's terrific protrayal of the Duke as a powerful manipulator. As far as the mechanical bits are concerned I thought this was a comparatively toned-down Complicite. The only thing that grated was the early use of George Bush's image on a TV screen, which seemed a token, rather lame and ultimately pointless gesture. The text is clear, the storytelling sharp, the overall feel one of effective conciseness. Lighting is very well-used - which is good to see after a couple of NT productions in which the lighting, usually a strong point, has been wanting - and good use is also made of shadows and silhouettes. Now, roll on the Globe's production. BACKDRIFTER - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.74.155.116)
02 Jun 04
Its good as a 'normal' production but not good enough to be called complcite - its just a sort of obvious 'university', 'big brother' style reading of the piece. But for me Complicite is more than just Simon McBurney - its that whole group of european performers/directors who devised and created Street of Crocs and gained Complicite its name. Doesn't need all the technical hoop - la just to get back to basics. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.69.37.108)
01 Jun 04
Gotta say that having played, it the Ollie is notoriously acoustically dodgy, depending where you sit, hence Trevor's insistence on a gentle radio-miking of the 99-2000 ensemble, what can you do when the architect refuses to allow any improvements stating " you wouldn't mess with a Leonardo..." hem hem, so that's a problem. But McB is the man, actor or director (or both) and the talents of the cast are not to be sniffed at... gotta be better than the RSC's limp produce last year, hey? - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.67.75)
31 May 04
There is a great deal in this production which is very impressive indeed. Simon McBurney gets better and better as a director. This is an exceptionally tricky play to bring off and he does it very well. For once, the use of cameras is an aid to understanding the production rather than a hindrance. A great deal of very good acting - David Troughton giving one of his very best performances; Paul Rhys continuing his creation of tortured characters. But.........you can have too much of a good thing and I wish that McBurney had relaxed his directorial control occasionally so that the audience was left to think for itself from time to time. So, the George Bush moment was pointless and the production would have been better without it. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.34.14)
31 May 04
I too went to see this production thinking it would be pretentious but I found it exciting and gripping - the acting was great - esp Paul Rhys as Angelo. Two and a half hours without an interval didn't seem long as far as the production was concerned but the seats were so uncomfortable I could have done with a chance to stretch my legs and other parts of my anatomy. It's the kind of production which needs a second visit to appreciate it fully. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.204.48.220)
28 May 04
Well I am deeply shocked that a few directorial flourishes have won the critics over. This is a play I do not really know and despite enjoying the moments of brilliance overall I came out not really knowing what was going on. It is a critics and officianados production, if shakespeare were around he would have taken his name of the poster. It doesnt tell the story. It's all look at me and not listen to me and understand and ultimately care. Naomi Frederick was like a hyperactive toddler, terrible. (Toby Jones as always brilliant.) Obviously I'm in a minority. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.255.64.8)
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.