Use the form below to search for tickets on your desired date. Dates from
Synopsis It's Saturday night and the judges are gathering for their prime-time slot, feeding the nation their weekly fix. Except the harshest critics are sitting on your sofa and the mute button doesn’t seem to work. A tough comedy about addiction. Age guidance 14+ Upstairs
What a barnstorming return this is for Nick Grosso, a writer who's been off the theatrical radar for nearly ten years.
This is kitchen sink drama, only now the sink sits on a faux-granite worksurface in a flashy warehouse apartment. But no amount of mod cons can disguise the fact that the situation these 30 and 40-somethings are in is a desperate one – all are dealing in various ways with the fall-out of addiction.
Katie's invited her friends Deanne and Rosanna round to watch X-Factor. Her partner Frank, a recovering drug addict, manfully puts up with them as they treat him like a barman, twice sending him out to fetch coke (as in cola) and ice. But when he disappears for more than half an hour, doubts about his whereabouts creep in, and Deanne and Rosanna, themselves haunted by their own failed relationships, delight in winding Katie up; “you're addicted to addicts” suggests Rosanna, helpfully.
Grosso touches on addictions of many kinds, from drugs and alcohol through to video games, internet surfing and even dysfunction. The generation of libidinous lads he chronicled in the 90s has – unsurprisingly – produced women like Katie, Deanne and Rosanna, who find their children without fathers and their partners without responsibility.
But this isn't just a play about addiction, it's also a pinpoint study of female friendship. Although I found it difficult to believe that the sensitive and sophisticated Katie would be so close to the coarse Rosanna and Deanne, nevertheless the way the power shifts around between the three is fascinating to watch. Poor old Frank is a pawn who takes their bullying in good humour, but there's always the threat that he will crack (dare I say one couldn't blame him for turning to his pipe).
Of the performances, the show-stealer is Lesley Sharp, in her element as the swaggering, cajoling, nitpicking Rosanna, a sadistic psychoanalyst who revels in the failings of others, while readily admitting to her own. Matching her for laughs however is Lisa Palfrey as the self-condemned “fat slag” Deanne - a study in self-destruction, a Welsh bonne vivante with four kids from four men who drinks the flat dry but denies she's an alcoholic.
As Frank and Katie, James Lance and Indira Varma are well matched and provide a nicely underplayed foil to the larger-than-life Sharp and Palfrey. Their relationship is complicated but touchingly co-dependent; when Frank discovers a friend and fellow addict has died, he childishly asks Katie why. And in a solemn, sober conclusion, he pours away the dregs of rum and cleans up the flat, a symbolic finale that ensures this engrossing evening ends with a glimmer of optimism.
Saw this last night. A friend rang me to say don't bother but I had the tickets. I should've gone for a walk or just gone to sleep. anything would have been better. The court has successes such as Enron (Headlong play) and Jerusalem (former artistic director). The Wallace Shaun season was a waste of time. Posh average. Now this TERRIBLE piece. Has the theatre has been given too much credit? Who thought this could go on? - David Scull
03 Jun 10
- I think you're all missing the point ... successful recovery isn't glamorous or fun and was symbolised beautifully at the end by Frank's cleaning of the kitchen. I thought the play and the production was a brave, brilliant and honest articulation of addiction and recovery. - h
02 Jun 10
I agree with previous posters: this is a desperately tedious play. The text is a complete non starter, with three boring women rabbiting endlessly in circles. Everyone floundered with the totally implausible characters they were playing and their irritatingly contrived verbal mannerisms, with Lesley Sharp coming off worst by far. There's not a single inventive or well-observed phrase anywhere, or an original joke. What grates even more is that it's delivered in such a false and stagey manner, all the characters rattling through at such a pace they barely stop to breathe or reflect. If illegal drug use makes people this boring, this is the best statement against drug use it's possible to imagine. - Oliver
30 May 10
Agree with all other reviews so far. It's the worst play that I have seen at the RC and one of the worst I have ever seen. Not a single credible character in sight. I regretted going back after the interval. - fred
29 May 10
Theo, you have some of the worst taste of anyone reviewing in Great Britain. - Dave F-T
29 May 10
I stayed for the second half and got more of the tedious pantomimic performances which I'd endured in the first half. Talk about sledgehammer theatre. - Nora
27 May 10
I agree whole-heartedly. Very disappointing. If the previous reviewer left at the interval, at least they missed they five minute long "cleaning of the kitchen" in the second half, which had me bewildered at why I'd paid to watch people do housework! Awful directorial decision. - SSH
27 May 10
One of the most tedious hours I have had to spend at the theatre for a long while and an hour because I couldn't take anymore and left at the interval - life's too short. Trite, repetitive and BORING! It would put anyone off theatre. What was Lesley Sharp attempting to do? Her performance was grotesque and for all the wrong reasons. Was that the director's fault, maybe, but I am reliably informed that this performance was a repetition of her less than impressive one in the recently produced Little Voice. With the Welsh character, Deanne, driveling on inconsequentially I felt I was watching an expletive laced version of Gavin and Stacey ..... only that is brilliantly observed comedy and funny too - the muted, self conscious, laughter tonight spoke volumes. What on earth induced the RC to take this awful play on? I know it's a production house specialising in new plays, but give us a break. - rds
The first theatre opened as The New Chelsea on 16 Apr 1870. Changed name to Belgravia. Re-opened as Royal Court 25 Jan 1871. Demolished in 1887. New theatre opened (current, slightly different site) 24 Sep 1888. Famous for supporting and commissioning new writing. Probably the first UK Theatre to regularly include their URL in advertising. Member of the Society of London Theatre. In 1996 the theatre closed for redevelopment, funded by the National Lottery. The refurbished theatre at Sloane Square re-opened in February 2000 including two theatres the 389 seat Jerwood Theatre Downstairs and the studio style Jerwood Theatre Upstairs.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.