Synopsis His Dark Materials takes us on a thrilling journey through worlds familiar and unknown. For Lyra and Will, its two central characters, it s a coming of age and a transforming spiritual experience. Their great quest demands a savage struggle against the most dangerous of enemies. They encounter fantastical creatures in parallel worlds - rebellious angels, soul-eating spectres, child-catching Gobblers and the armoured bears and witch-clans of the Arctic. Finally, before reaching, perhaps, the republic of heaven, they must visit the land of the dead. His Dark Materials is produced in two parts. Please check with the Box Office whether part I or part II is being show on the day you would like to attend. Running time of each part: 3 hours.
Tickets were as hard to come by as gold dust when the National first premiered its spectacular two-part theatrical adaptation of His Dark Materials last Christmas, and that’s going to be the case all over again as it returns there this year. So while dust, in Philip Pullman’s parlance here, is a manifestation of original sin, you may well have to commit one to get a ticket.
If you manage to do so, you’ll also discover some of the secrets of the parallel universes that it takes you to, as well as wrestle with some profound theological and spiritual questions to do with our casting out of paradise, notions of finding heaven wherever we are, and facing up to death.
All of this and a lot more is wrapped up in Nicholas Wright’s amazingly skilful and propulsive dovetailing of the three novels that comprise Pullman’s tale into a series of physical and spiritual theatrical adventures. The big quests are matched by bigger questions that raise the stakes for audiences of all ages, and Nicholas Hytner (newly joined by Matt Wilde as co-director) sends this epic narrative on its way with even more confidence than before.
Last time around, the big question was whether the story could be realised theatrically at all. Now that there’s no doubt that it can, the creative team (and a mostly all-new cast) are freshly invigorated to make its dense, intensely layered storytelling simultaneously both emotionally darker and dramatically clearer.
As it follows two 12-year-olds, Lyra and Will (Elaine Symons and Michael Legge, equally as convincing as their amazing predecessors Anna Maxwell Martin and Dominic Cooper), from separate universes who are both looking for their absent parents and find each other along the way, a play of love and loss, prophecy and superstition is magnificently played out.
While Michael Curry’s puppets (of ‘daemons’ that accompany the characters, rebellious angels and armoured bears) are once again a breathtaking, superbly manipulated wonder, a massive ensemble cast also fully inhabit this alternately familiar and alien landscape.
Among them, there are outstanding contributions from David Harewood’s muscular adventurer Lord Asriel, the sinisterly poised Lesley Manville as Mrs Coulter, John Carlisle (recreating his performance from last year) as the colluding Lord Boreal, and Adjoa Andoh as the Queen of the Lapland Witches.
- Mark Shenton
NOTE: The following FOUR-STAR review dates from January 2004 and this production’s original run at the Nationa.
"Exit pursued by a bear" is often cited as the theatre's most difficult-to-realise stage direction (Act 3, Scene 3 of Shakespeare's The Winter's Tale). But it's nothing next to the infinite demands of adapting Philip Pullman's massive cult novels, His Dark Materials, for the stage.
This dramatisation must summon and realise entire parallel universes to our own, show the cutting of holes that allow passage between them, not to mention bring into being the "daemons" that accompany each character, a set of rebellious angels, and a whole army of armoured polar bears.
Director Nicholas Hytner is no stranger to ambition or daring - he's previously overseen the landing of a helicopter on stage in Miss Saigon, the spinning of a fairground carousel in the opening minutes of Carousel, and here on the same Olivier stage, the subterranean universe of The Wind in the Willows. Once again pressing the incredible drum revolve of the Olivier into hyper-active service, Hytner and his resourceful designer Giles Cadle restlessly and relentlessly propel the dense action of this fantastical story forward, yet never swamping the human dimensions that allow us entry to it.
Told, in Nicholas Wright's two-part adaptation, as a memory play of myth and mystery, it begins and ends on a bench in the shadow of an apple tree, where we meet Lyra (Anna Maxwell Martin) and Will (Dominic Cooper), sitting together but somehow apart. Like Wendy and Peter Pan, they will go on a journey together; but will eventually be separated, too, not by Peter's refusal to grow up, but by the necessity for Will and Lyra to both do so. Not simply a tale of maturing, there's also ample focus on exploration and parenting, the conflicts of church and state, environmental damage, weapons of mass destruction, and the claims of prophesy.
In other words, His Dark Materials is a very modern story set within a mythical context. And, as Hytner did in his opening production of Henry V at this address, the contemporary resonance is boldly stated. Note, for example, the speech delivered by the President: "The world is facing two great crises. To begin with the one you know of: war is inevitable. Lord Asriel is building a fortress. He is developing weapons of new and awesome potential. Rebel angels are flocking to him in their thousands." This could be Bush talking about Saddam this time last year.
However, both the story and production have a wider purchase on our imaginations. As stunningly supported by the puppets of Michael Curry (a principal collaborator of Julie Taymor's in realising those in The Lion King), there's the rich psychological world of the 'daemons' - physical manifestations of the human soul that take the shapes of spiders, monkeys, lizards, snakes and other animals - that guide each character.
A superb ensemble company bring all of this to magical life, including former 007 actor Timothy Dalton as the swashbuckling adventurer Lord Asriel; Patricia Hodge as the sinister mother figure of Mrs Coulter; and Niamh Cusack as the Queen of the Lapland Witches.
I'm ashamed that I had not read the books before seeing the plays; the productions, while flawed, have inspired me to do so forthwith. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (128.40.79.243)
22 Mar 04
When I first heard that these books were to be staged I just thought 'how?' In the end it wasn't bad, and a supreme effort, doing an adequate job of telling the story, but the speed that was necessary to get through it all also meant that there was little meat to anything. The script is all rather obvious in a sort of Sunday-tea-time children's drama way, and it is only the touching ending that left me moved and involved in any way. That said it has sold well, the teenage audience loved it, so maybe it reached its target market. It was all just so superficial, and that is one thing I don't expect from a trip to the theatre. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.113.17.218)
17 Feb 04
This magnificent and endearing production seems to me to be in the pantomime tradition. No slur intended. It is a complex story, with a difficult and rather alien morality but told with confidence. I loved the daemons, particularly Pan and Stelmaria. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (193.118.203.3)
09 Feb 04
Lyra, the witches and the other worlds. The sets, costumes and music were excellent. The plot went a good pace, altough the send part did drag a bit. Most of the acting was good, but oh dear the witches were dire and I wanted to cheer when one of them killed themselves. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.7.154.123)
04 Feb 04
A website malfunction gave the review below 3 stars where none were intended. However, it seems 1 star is the minimum that can be awarded - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.43.168.105)
03 Feb 04
Oh dear God in Heaven, deliver me from my sins! I have done penance in the form of six relentless hours of His Dark Materials at the National Theatre. I have suffered enough.
The one thing that must be said in its defence is that it is giving employment to a host of actors, and as is revealed in the rather moving final bow, to a small army of technicians. It is also providing fairly harmless diversion for the middlebrow classes, who left the theatre in an afterglow of satisfaction. They felt they had been enlightened. I followed morosely in their footsteps, depressed that the imagination of the nation is so impoverished that such tosh is taken seriously.
Four weeks had passed since I'd endured Part One, and so little impression had it made that I worried that I might not be able to follow the story. Surely we'd get "Previously, on His Dark Materials.." (We sort of did.) But I had only to read the cast-list to feel the will to live seep through my pores: Lyra Belaqua, Lord Asriel, Seraphina Pelaaka, Galileo Figaro and Scaramouche. Whoops, the last two appeared in We Will Rock You but it's an easy mistake: both shows are vaguely futuristic, and each in its muddled way is an attack on authority - but We Will Rock You has Queen songs and doesn't have the irritating "daemons".
Oh dear God, the "daemons"! Don't let anyone try to tell you that this conceit works. They are the worst idea since R2T2 and CP3O. These "Jungian manifestations of the consciousness" or "guardian angels" (wrong on both counts) are operated by distracting black-clad dancers who skip around the actors pretending that the audience can't see them. I'm told that this is a theatrical convention. If it is, I never want to see it again. It used to be a convention that wenches strolled through the theatre selling oranges, and they would be a much more welcome sight.
Some of the actors do their best, which under the circumstances can't be easy. Anna Maxwell Martin and Dominic Cooper play with conviction, and manage to be quite touching. Patricia Hodge is clearly longing to get out of this mess, and into a nice tour of Hay Fever in the better regional theatres: it would be bliss, it would be Judith Bliss. Timothy Dalton is stalwart: he stands, legs apart and shouts his lines to the back of the circle. (There is a lot of shouting, and indeed pointing, at the back of the circle - even though the actors are heavily miked. Thank you Mr Hytner; your arrogance denied us the pleasure of hearing Shakespeare's words last summer, but you don't spare us the clunky dialogue here.)
I expected some of the minor performances to have developed since the play opened, but sadly most of the cast are going through the motions. What else could they do? We know from their track record that most of them can do much better than this; the awfulness of some of the performances is so extreme it must be definitive.
Great claims have been made for Philip Pullman's book as a serious meditation on religion, and I have to concede that on one front, his collaboration with Nicholas Wright and Old Nick Hytner presented a serious challenge to my faith. It is bad beyond belief.
- USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.43.168.105)
03 Feb 04
This was, without a doubt, one of the most spectacular pieces of theatre I have seen for a good long while. I am a huge fan of the books, and so approached the idea of a stage adaption with some trepidation. This was not entirely unfounded: the play does have it's problems, as one would expect from any attempt to tell such a huge, deep and complex story in such a limited timeframe. While the events of the narrative were, for the most part, superbly realised, it was noticable that the rush to include as much plot as possible led to problems of pace and clarity. The events of Lyra's adventures rushed by at breakneck speed and I found myself wondering what would be made of it by anyone who had not read the books. Characters flit on and off stage, concepts and srtifacts are introduced in one breath to be seemingly forgotten in the next, and it was only during the interval that I was able to knit some of the threads together in my mind. This speed also led to a feeling of shallowness, as the play sometimes seemed to be content with merely presenting events, without exploring the emotional and conceptual depths that are such a strength of the books.
But these are, in a way, minor niggles. teken as a companion to the books, rather than a replacement, the play was deeply thrilling. I must confess to being struck with child-like awe, as is only appropriate, at the audacious staging and the visual richness of it all. The cast were also superb, and it was a thrill to see the characters I love so much brought to life so well. Special kudos to Timothy Dalton, who captured the contradictory nature of Lord Asriel perfectly. And full respect to the writer and director for not diluting the books' healthy contempt for the foulnesses or organised religion.
Duncan Lewis
- USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.122.102.33)
26 Jan 04
Having just seen both parts on the same day, I have to say that although purists may justifiably nit-pick at the text, this is a stunning and extraordinary theatrical event. Six and a half hours of pure magical storytelling held a packed auditorium (many of whom were children) totally entranced - the intervals buzzed with excited discussions as youngsters carefully explained the plot and central themes to their parents. This is the kind of production that guarantees the future of theatre and we should all be grateful for the vision, commitment and energy of all concerned. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.67.74)
25 Jan 04
the absolute worst thing i have ever seen at the theatre. complete tedium. i want those 7 hours of my life back. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.133.154.1)
21 Jan 04
I saw both parts in one day and loved it. it really was a thrillingly epic undertaking and very imaginatively - and theatrically (no overreliance on video back projection here) - staged. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.69.37.108)
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.