Synopsis Set in modern London where a young woman, alone and unattached catches the eye of a stranger in a bar. Before the night has ended, they will have told each other secrets that will change their lives forever. Kate Bett's debut stage play takes us from the depths of underground caves to the infinite reaches of the solar system and into the shattered heart of a broken family. On the Third Day reveals once again that the most memorable journeys are across the terrain of the human soul. Winner of Channel 4's 'The Play's the Thing'. Production originally conceived by Steven Pimlott.
On the Third Day, the winning play of Channel 4’s The Play's the Thing (See News, 13 Jun 2006), received its world premiere at the West End’s New Ambassadors Theatre last night (Thursday 22 June 2006, previews from 13 June). And today, 51-year-old first-time playwright Kate Betts is finding out what it’s like to face the critical onslaught.
In the four-part TV series, which concludes with opening night footage on tomorrow (Saturday 24 June 2006), producer Sonia Friedman – with the help of literary agent Mel Kenyon and actor Neil Pearson – were set the challenge of finding a never-before-produced writer and preparing their debut play for a professional commercial run. Over 2,000 aspiring playwrights entered the competition. Maxine Peake, Paul Hilton and Tom McKay star in the resulting stage production, which is directed by Robert Delamere after the original director Steven Pimlott fell ill (See News, 25 May 2006).
Many overnight critics admired the effort the producers, actors, directors and budding playwrights went to in bringing new work into the West End – which they said was a worthwhile experiment – but few were overly impressed by the winning play, which they felt was too muddled, ambiguous, slow and confusing to cut it in the commercial West End. While Betts has talent, ruled the critics, it has not yet flourished with this debut.
Michael Coveney on Whatsonstage.com - “One would like to be encouraging in such circumstances, especially as Friedman has given Betts a fine cast, and Robert Delamere’s production, eye-catchingly designed by Mark Thompson, gives the script, which limps from scene to scene without any psychological or dramatic momentum, every possible chance…. The best you can say of the play is that, lacking heart and logic, it could be excused as a messy dream… one can only congratulate the actors for giving Kate Betts the benefit of the doubt in a non-play that beggars belief and would try the patience of a saint, let alone a West End audience.”
Charles Spencer in the Daily Telegraph - Far more positive, Spencer confessed, "I was unexpectedly impressed by On the Third Day. This is a very weird drama indeed. There are shafts of comedy in all this, but the overall mood of Robert Delamere's gripping and beautifully acted production, is one of terrible pain. I'm a sucker for plays with religious dimensions; others may find the piece utter tosh. But there is no denying the ambition and depth of feeling in the writing. Maxine Peake gives a shatteringly raw, anguished performance. Paul Hilton is genuinely engaging…. And there is an emotional candour and generosity about Betts' writing that bodes well for the future."
Benedict Nightingale in The Times - “One would have to be a blend of Scrooge, Rumpelstiltskin and Cruella de Vil not to wish this piece well… though Betts’ play is refreshingly bold and even original, it’s what she herself called it: a bit whimsical and raw. Sadly, it’s less than the sum of its ambitions, which are to deal with trauma, grief, incest and the confusions of an infinitely vast universe and the almost equally complex world in which a bloke calling himself Jesus may actually be an environmental health officer named Mike, but just may be that ontological EHO, Jesus.” He added, encouragingly: “If I’m asked to take sides in the argument on TV between Friedman and one of her advisers, Neil Pearson — ‘I want to get lost in Betts’s world’, 1I want her world to get lost’ — I’m more with the producer than the actor.”
Michael Billington in the Guardian - Billington said the play “is certainly not the disaster that some were expecting and a few keenly anticipating: it is a raw, wild, uneven piece that reveals a degree of theatrical imagination… The second half… lapses into whimsy. And the flashbacks to Claire's childhood religiosity, when she believes she encounters Jesus in a deserted church, suggest Whistle Down the Wind without the music. Yet I was never bored and Betts reveals a bold theatrical sense… Betts displays a gift for wry humour… For a debutant dramatist, she has also been well served by her interpreters. Robert Delamere's production and Mark Thompson's design whisk us briskly from childhood past to adult present and from south London to the Welsh countryside. Maxine Peake as the confused Claire, Tom McKay as her importunate brother and Paul Hilton as the haggard Mike, echoing the biblical Christ he played in the RSC Mysteries, also serve the text honourably.” Billington concluded: “there is enough in her (Betts’) play to make me feel she has a wayward talent.”
Paul Taylor in the Independent - Taylor “wondered why such a talented cast and such excellent production values had been lavished on a drama of which I couldn't really believe a word, even while recognising the sincerity of the writing… you feel an awkward disproportion between this purported amplitude and the actual emotional dimensions of the play… From the point of view of finding new talent, it would have been better to spend the money on a mini-festival at the Bush or the Gate. But that would not have been invidious enough for TV, which will never be theatre's route to rescue.”
Nicholas de Jongh in the Evening Standard - “Practising masochists, interested in experiencing the oppressive boredom and angry bewilderment that a chronically inept piece of theatre can induce, should rush to savour Kate Betts' On the Third Day.” De Jongh admired “Maxine Peake's touchingly distraught, 30-year-old Claire” but said “director Robert Delamere and designer Mark Thomson, who variously turns the stage into planetarium, apartment and sea-shore, cannot rescue the play from its hectic, almost comic preposterousness, or do anything about its shifts from one theatrical plane to another… Peake's intense, neurotically powered performance and Paul Hilton's cool one are the evening's only consolations… Certainly Friedman's aim was brave, worthwhile and imaginative… Betts can write natural-sounding dialogue, but on this evidence, she does not know how to put a play together.”
Is it possible to kickstart a new theatrical writing talent via a reality television programme? Kate Betts, a 51-year-old mother of three who teaches at Chichester University, is the first-time playwright who has won the Channel 4 contest in the four-part series The Play’s the Thing.
The programme’s producer, Jan Younghusband, used to work at the National Theatre under Sir Peter Hall, and suggested the scheme to producer Sonia Friedman. The TV programmes have made compelling, though sometimes embarrassingly grisly, viewing as the plays were whittled down from a final 30 to just three, which were then battered into some kind of shape by Friedman and her fellow judges, literary agent Mel Kenyon and actor Neil Pearson.
Betts’ play is about a woman, Claire (Maxine Peake), who works at the London Planetarium, harbours incestuous feelings for her brother Robbie (Tom McKay) and meets an environmental health officer, Mike (Paul Hilton), who claims he was “a sort of only child” and is, in fact, Jesus (maybe). He's not so much whistling down the wind as whistling in the dark. Friedman detected a theatrical vision in Betts’ play that's simply not evident in the performance. She wanted, she said, “to get lost” in Betts’ world; Neil Pearson wanted Betts’s world “to get lost”.
One would like to be encouraging in such circumstances, especially as Friedman has given Betts a fine cast, and Robert Delamere’s production, eye-catchingly designed by Mark Thompson, gives the script, which limps from scene to scene without any psychological or dramatic momentum, every possible chance. And every possible chance is wasted.
On TV, Friedman kept yelling at Betts that she hadn’t found any explanation for Claire’s crisis. She still hasn’t, beyond piling up symptoms of a sense of failure. Maxine Peake has played Myra Hindley in the ITV drama See No Evil and the slatternly Veronica in Channel 4’s Shameless. But she simply cannot find a way into Claire, who cuts herself with scissors and says things like “I am awash with words but I can’t swim”.
The best you can say of the play is that, lacking heart and logic, it could be excused as a messy dream. Thompson’s design responds by filling the stage with the amniotic fluid of a deserted beach, a night-time galaxy at the planetarium, the stained glass windows of a vaulted church, and the darkling caves of the Brecon Beacons. And Adam Cork’s soundtrack suddenly breaks out into “Mars” from the Planets as Claire, keen to get down to business, tells Jesus that she’s got some condoms.
The incestuous theme is fully stated, but not resolved, at Claire’s 30th birthday party where the “real” Jesus actor, Tom Silburn, turns up as an Elvis impersonator. One wonders how anyone kept a straight face at this point and can only congratulate the actors for giving Betts the benefit of the doubt in a non-play that beggars belief and would try the patience of a saint, let alone a West End audience.
Based on the TV series and the press reviews, I really wasn't looking forward to this - even at just a fiver for a ticket. Admittedly some of the dialogue needs more work but the story is genuinely involving, even if the concept of Mike actually being Jesus (?) is barking mad. There were times when I wondered if Kate Betts relly knew where the plot was heading but reassuringly the ending was quite moving with loose ends tied up satifactorily.
All credit to Sonia Friedman, not just for the original idea, but for giving this play such a big production with excellent use of sound and video. However, I do feel it would have been even more effective if edited down to a one-act piece in a smaller space such as the Donmar.
Finally, during the very beief curtain call Maxine Peake looked slightly embarressed by the whole thing. She needn't - the response from the audience (albeit quite sparce) was appreciative, her performance was excellent and I've seen far worse recently by so-called great writers; remember Romance, The God of Hell or The Cut? This is far superior to any of those train wrecks. - 62.6.139.13)
07 Jul 06
Not the best play I've seen, but by no means the worst; I've seen some shameful productions written by established playwrights. For a first try, this had a lot to recommend it, some genuinely comic moments (not, sadly, in my view the Elvis impersonator, though my friends were amused by that... I was just embarrassed), and some emotional scenes. The superb acting made the most of the rather patchy script which would, I think, have been better served by a smaller theatre without the high expectations of the West End. I think Kate Betts could have a great future, but needs more practice, preferably (for her sake) away from intrusive reality television. Not bad for a first effort. - 86.138.59.197)
06 Jul 06
I agree that MC has been very harsh with his one star. I appreciate that the exceptional production values and excellent acting paper over the cracks of a mediocre play, but it held my atention from start to finish. I did find the (intentional?) ambiguity of the story somewhat pompous, and the play would proabbly have been served better in a smaller production in smaller space. However, Sonia Friedman has really focused our minds on the lack of new writing in the West End, and for that her experiment is worthwhile. - 86.130.206.83)
05 Jul 06
This play is very ambiguous, allowing the audience to draw their own conclusions on several aspects (is he really Jesus? Is the whole thing in Claire's head? Just how incestuous was her relationship with her brother?), and I believe it is for this reason that the critics have been overly harsh. They clearly expected not to enjoy the play when they arrived - most critics seem to cultivate artistic snobbery, pouring praise on several productions I have found predictable and have been positively bored watching, and slating productions that I have found to be very interesting, exciting and innovative in their approaches. 'On the Third Day' is one of these productions, which I enjoyed tremendously, for the very reason that it was so different from anything else you see in the West End and, despite the reality TV aspect, it appeared to be far less commercially manufactured than most of the big shows. The set was well thought out, providing an easy way to transform the space between planetarium, apartment, and underground caves without too much hassle (though perhaps a few too many times). The use of Christian iconography was also strong, particularly in the foot washing scene and the last supper episode at the end of the play. The links between Robbie and his dark underground 'Hell' contrasted sharply with Claire's obsession with the starry 'Heaven', and the use of predominantly black and white costumes furthered this idea of darkness and light, and Jesus' attempts to bring their dark past out of them in order to cleanse their sins and bring them to the light. In my interpretation, Mike was not Jesus, yet he played at being Jesus (hence Betts' original working title 'Playing Jesus'), finding pleasure in resolving the problems of others and purging their emotions to the point that they could be forgiven for their past sins. In my opinion, this was a strong play, especially for a first-time writer, although it did seem rather that she had been forced to leave behind the initial 'Is he really Jesus or not?' storyline in favour of exploring big issues such as incest and self-harm, as a vehicle for making a play big enough for production in a West End theatre. All in all, a show I would definitely recommend to anyone who is utterly bored with the predictability and commercialism of most West End theatre. - 81.79.72.222)
03 Jul 06
The critics really have sharpened their knives on this one! I think they've been a bit over harsh: Kate Betts clearly has a good ear for naturalistic comic dialogue, and one of the play's central premises (what would you do if somebody you knew claimed to be Jesus?!) is certainly intriguing. On the down side, some of the serious writing tends towards the bad side of soap operatic, and the construction of the piece is messy. Nonetheless, Robert Delamare's stylish production (beautifully designed by Mark Thompson) is top class, and the cast are all brilliant. Maxine Peake's troubled Claire is a genuinely touching, technically superb performance full of passion, guts and fire. Am sure Betts is very grateful to all involved! Although the play has its longeurs, it isn't the disaster many critics have suggested. I realise that the point of this being on is the TV programme, but it is still a bit frustrating that all this money and talent has been lavished on this while playwrights like Laura Wade and Chloe Moss have yet to make their West End debuts. - 195.82.123.181)
30 Jun 06
It doesn't quite hang together but for a first try it's certainly a lot more enjoyable than some plays that the "big" names have given us in recent years.
The main review seems to have missed the point about the guilt of killing the father having driven a 12 year ld girl into her own world that she still can't escape at 30.
Elvis gets all the laughs but at the wrong time, thats an Act 1 character and gags but at totally the wrong time of the play. One author in search of an ending. - 194.223.152.82)
29 Jun 06
The sequence of events in the play gave the impression to me of being almost entirely in the head of the main character (superbly played by Maxine Peake). Unable to sustain a relationship with anyone due to her incestuous and religious experiences as a child, she fantasises that a man she meets in a bar is Jesus - then tells herself that, of course, he can't be. Because of her troubled relationship with her brother, he also appears in her dream, mixed with the man, Mike, and finally with Elvis. So typical of a dream's inconsequence, I am suprised that so few seem to have seen the play in this way. The "last supper" scene in the restaurant was a powerful image, but I felt that the end was muddled. and the author had perhaps not been given her head by the production advisors. Technically complex, the staging was rather "bitty", while the planetarium sequences seemed to go nowhere, and added nothing to the piece. Possibly last minute cuts were to blame? There were very good performances all round, and the obvious desire of all the actors to do their utmost to make the play a success was palpable. A promising debut for Kate Betts, but this was not really a West End production - it would do well in a studio venue. She has an ear for dialogue and the play moved at a good pace. I look forward to more from her in future. - 194.75.225.62)
24 Jun 06
coveneys overly harsh I think... the play is a bit all over the place but there are some really good scenes and its lifted immersurably by an outstanding central performance by the godly (!) Paul Hilton - what an actor - 80.229.45.194)
23 Jun 06
I'm very suspicious of the TV gameshow approach to this play and also towards how much the author actually contributed (a very "collaborative effort, I suspect) but I think Michael Coveney's 1 star review is harsh. It's not a great play but it's not a bad one. I saw 6 new plays last year - 3 were much better than this and 3 were much worse. That makes it about average. I give it 3 stars (2 for achievement and another 1 for effort). I did find it tedious and obvious at times but also quite bold and showing visual flair. I'd really like to be supportive towards the play, and the effort to give new work a higher profile, but the background to the production makes it difficult. I hope that Kate Betts (and all the other writers in the contest who are serious about playwriting) get the opportunity to learn the craft in a more appropriate environment. And I do hope that On the Third Day gets a decent run. If you can get a good ticket deal, go and see it. - 217.36.82.121)
Opened 5 Jun 1913. The Mousetrap opened here on 25 Nov 52 (a palindromic date - 25/11/52) and later transferred to St Martin's (Mar74). 460 seats. Likely to be split in two under a major re-design by William Dudley. From 1996 for a couple of years this theatre housed the Royal Court Upstairs while their Sloane Square theatre was refurbished. After refurbishment it was re-opened as the New Ambassadors. An [ATG] member. Society of London Theatre member. Following acquirition by Sir Stephen Waley-Cohen in April 2007 the theatre name reverted to The Ambassadors
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.