Synopsis The Glee Club, made up of five hard working, hard drinking miners and a church organist, is preparing for the local gala. Though they're established on the working men's club circuit, they aren't exactly at the vanguard of the musical revolution. Sometimes compassion and understanding, as well as bigotry and cowardice, can come from the most unlikely of places. This is the summer of 1962; music and much else is about to change - so too the lives of these six men. Nothing and no-one will ever be the same again.
Note: The following review dates from February 2002 and the production's original run at the Bush Theatre.
Take five miners, add a church organist, pour on a few pints and some 1950s ballads and you've got Richard Cameron's charming piece, The Glee Club.
Set in the summer of 1962 in a small mining village in south Yorkshire, the story is loosely narrated by Colin, the youngest of the motley crew, which also consists of: Jack the sensible ex-union rep, Scobie the consummate family man, Walt the pensive widower, Bant the thuggish softie and Phil the bookish organist. There's excitement in the air because the local gala is coming up - which will make a change from the working men's clubs the group normally entertain.
Cameron paints a touching picture of men who risk their lives in the mines every day and who are bolstered up by music and one another. They are a true band of brothers, so when one of their own, Phil, comes up for scrutiny in the community they all have something to say about it.
The story is deftly set up and reinforced by writing that's a heady mix of banter and poignant exchanges, peppered with some rousing tunes (courtesy of musical director Mia Souteriou) - all of which results in a transfixing piece of theatre. Mike Bradwell's direction is also impressive, effortlessly navigating the six actors through the tale.
The audience can hear every note and see every glance in stereo, so there's no margin for error - and none is made. Every performance is real, each relationship with its own nuances, and the group's dynamic gradually changes, like a piece of music, as the characters discover things about themselves and their peers, and slowly begin to mature.
The actors are flawless, each giving an award-worthy performance. My personal favourites are David Schofield, totally convincing as Bant, who makes dick jokes one minute and laments the estrangement of his wife the next. David Bamber is suitably difficult to read as the isolated Phil, different to the other men, yet he inspires incredible loyalty in them all. Don't be fooled, it may be set in a mining village but it's not all sepia-tinted. Admittedly, the first half is dewy-eyed and nostalgic, but after the interval, reality kicks in and tests the men's mettle.
It's not often you get such a full-bodied show that delivers, but the Bush has struck gold with this one - it's a must see. It may be grim up north but The Glee Club will put a smile on your face.
I booked the tickets for the matinee on May 4th - Cup Final Day!!. Husband not happy but will watch first half of play and then go to pub to watch second half of match. Enjoyed the play so much he stayed with me to watch it all. It is a very funny, moving and clever piece of theatre - it is still making me think 5 days later. The language and nudity were essential and not over done don't let that put anybody off. We loved it and will probably see it again. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
09 May 02
Good to see that it's made it to the West End, into the relatively cosy
Duchess Theatre. It's a funny, witty and touching play with some fine performances (especially the two Davids - Bamber and Schofield) and.... yes, the shower scene nudity takes your breath away a bit, but succeeds in making the production more intimate. (Rather you than me, though, lads!) It's a great show, so don't miss it - I promise it'll leave you with a smile on your face. Andrew B - USER: Whatsonstage.com
25 Apr 02
A truly wonderful piece of theatre - funny and moving. I saw it at the Bush - delighted it's transferring. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
24 Apr 02
The show is over rated a little bit but it was quite an enjoyable night at the theatre. The story developed well and all the characters were well played. It was good the way the story started off on a high and then sort of turned it act 2 when secrets and lies were revealed. There was some strong language but no worse than in Art or Humble Boy. There were a couple of nude scenes, which two old dears in front of me seemed to enjoy and David Bamber is pretty well hung. A show worth seeing but not a 'must see' show. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
21 Apr 02
You probably need to be over 35 to appreciate the nuances but extremely good. The full frontals were a bit unexpected - lots of them and not all pretty sights! - USER: Whatsonstage.com
Opened 25 Nov 1929. 476 seats. Bought from Andrew Lloyd Webber and now owned by Broadway producer Max Weitzenhoffer and Nica Burns. Society of London Theatre member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.