Synopsis Faced with losing his child in a custody battle, a desperate father discovers that being a good man seems to count for very little. Mike Bartlett's first play takes an incisive, honest look at fatherhood and what it means to be a good parent. Downstairs
The life of a man, said the philosopher Thomas Hobbes, is nasty, brutish and short, and the same could be said of this stunning almost first play by 25-year-old Mike Bartlett – I have seen an even more complex, remarkable Bartlett play about racism and peer group pressure in the Hampstead Theatre’s Heat and Light young people’s programme - but he must count on the record as yet another highly promising graduate of the Royal Court’s Young Writers Programme.
The Downstairs auditorium has been obliterated by designer Miriam Buether. The audience enters a tunnel that might well be a carriage on the Jubilee Line, with yellow tubular poles and handrails, where a young boy chases an electrified model car and actors you recognise – Ben Miles, Sara Kestelman, Jan Chappell, Lia Williams in a bright orange hair-do – pretend to blend in. We’re standing in a space that does not want to be in the Royal Court but take us elsewhere.
The more indolent first night critics and guests chose to sit on bar stools running behind a thin aluminium table redolent of Eurostar. The rest of us stood around two raised terraces, arranged traverse-style, like rush-hour city commuters. One bar-stooled critic received a wake-up call when Miles kicked in a waste canister right by her writing arm. The theatre’s chairman chuckled. The theatre’s former casting director was in tears.
What might seem precious turns out to be anything but. Miles plays Man whose son, the boy, has been wrested from him after a split with Williams as Woman. Kestelman is Williams’ incontinent mother, Chappell a less insistent presence as Miles’ mother. No one in this play has a name apart from the boy’s “new Dad,” Karl (Adam James) who confronts Man after he has abducted Child and punches his lights out.
It’s not that good, really, and too sentimental, but what I like about Bartlett’s play is its simplicity and starkness, its realisation that to make good theatre you can pare right down to basics and raw emotions, and honest dissections of relationships, like you can lacerate them. The play – which runs for just 45 minutes – is written in flinty, aggressive dialogue with one or two really potent, poetic paragraph speeches.
Man has a crisis of masculinity to deal with as well as a stifled paternal role, and Miles plays this with a fierce concentration that is almost overwhelming. He is jeered at by Williams’ rather nasty Woman, despised by his own son, humiliated by a prostitute who offers a blow job. And yet he is still the character we like most at the end. Little Adam Arnold’s coldly manipulative, but vulnerable Child, is a complete pain. “I don’t like books,” he says, “they’re gay”; brilliantly acted, though.
The direction by Sacha Wares – her debut as one of new artistic director Dominic Cooke’s associates – is outstanding. The play is pitiless and horribly convincing, the presentation lively, different, and interesting. You feel that if we do have to have yet more misery, and more proof that children rarely get the parents they deserve, let’s at least have all this bad news with some theatrical panache. And that, in this case, we have, in spades, and in the performances of a remarkable cast.
A heavy handed smattering of cliches. Don't bother. - ryan
22 May 07
Well if this is Mike Bartlett's first offering we should be in for some treats in the future. It is an amazing piece of theatre and I agree with the writer, below, who say's it is just what the Royal Court is for. Unlike PWH I cannot comment on whether it is like an episode of Casualty or The Bill as I don't watch either of them. Without wishing to give too much away the actors and audience mingle before the play starts. That caused much speculation between my companion and I as to who was, and who wasn't in the cast. But a quick check of the program finally settled that. I was bowled over by the performance of Adam Arnold who plays the subject of the play. Unless he is a remarkably young looking twenty something he shows a depth of understanding and experience way beyond his more likely age of twelve or thirteen? To be so close to the actors is in itself exciting. One feels part of the action. The space they have created in the Jerwood is like a rather large tube train carriage. Elongated, with the action taking place along the whole of the central section. I sat midway, and felt that if I had been at either of the far ends I would have been cheated out of some of the action, although the cast do move constantly up and down the space. To me it is more a theatrical experience than a fully realised play, yet I came away thorughly exhilarated by it even though its run time is only 40 minutes. The intensity the actors give to their performances, in particular Lia Williams, Ben Miles, Adam James and Sara Kestelman came over more powerfully in the intimacy of this space. I thoroughly recommend it to anyone who likes a challenge. - rds
22 May 07
An impressive first play given a stunning production, which is both thrilling and devastating. I felt more involved in the play than almost any other drama I've seen of late and its 40 mins made me think more than any
3-hour play ever has; a clear case of less is more. The director / design team behind 'generations' have done it again. Exactly what the Royal Court is for and a great start to the Dominic Cooke era. - Gareth James
18 May 07
Great writing and acting. This script feels like it's demonstrating a premise, rather than arguing about a question - and this might make the characters feel more limited than a story that allowed itself more dissent - but Mike Bartlett is a writer to watch. - fred
15 May 07
Poor! Yes representative of dysfunctional families but limited development of character roles and a weak story line. Shame on you Royal Court! - MJH
14 May 07
The theatre looks amazing, but this play is utter tripe... the script belongs in Casualty or the Bill, not the Royal Court. - PWH
10 May 07
i have got to say this was absolutely incredibe!!! the kid is facinating and the hole set is just out of this world!! - playwrighter)
The first theatre opened as The New Chelsea on 16 Apr 1870. Changed name to Belgravia. Re-opened as Royal Court 25 Jan 1871. Demolished in 1887. New theatre opened (current, slightly different site) 24 Sep 1888. Famous for supporting and commissioning new writing. Probably the first UK Theatre to regularly include their URL in advertising. Member of the Society of London Theatre. In 1996 the theatre closed for redevelopment, funded by the National Lottery. The refurbished theatre at Sloane Square re-opened in February 2000 including two theatres the 389 seat Jerwood Theatre Downstairs and the studio style Jerwood Theatre Upstairs.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.