Synopsis In a quaint Victorian house in Brooklyn, Abby and Martha Brester have quietly poisoned twelve old men and buried them in the cellar. Their nephew arrives, a conman with yet another corpse and mayhem. A timeless classic on Broadway and the West End.
For many, Joseph Kesselring Broadway comedy is remembered not as a play at all, but rather as a film classic thanks to Frank Capra's 1944 screen version starring Cary Grant.
Producer Katherine Dore and director Matthew Francis clearly decided the original needed dusting off for a re-run - housed, with a knowing nod to history, at the West End's Strand Theatre, where it had its original London season some 60 years ago - and they've assembled a pretty stellar cast to do the honours.
Onstage proceedings take place in the Brooklyn home of Abby and Martha Brewster, two delightfully batty old spinsters, played here to great effect by Thelma Barlow (Mavis from the TV soap Coronation Street) and the incomparable Marcia Warren, a woman for whom playing bonkers OAPs has become an art form after her award-winning stint last year in Humble Boy.
Abby and Martha's secret, kept from their nephew Mortimer (Drop the Dead Donkey's Stephen Tompkinson), is that they have a penchant for bumping off lonely old men, on whom they take pity, and then burying them in the basement.
This rather macabre premise for a comedy really gets into its swing when the sinister black sheep of the family, Jonathan (a role created on stage and film by Boris Karloff - casting which inspired plenty of script gags - and here played by American Michael Richards of Seinfeld fame), comes to stay, with his plastic surgeon plus a corpse of his own in tow and the police on his tail. What ensues is part slapstick, part dark humour and, though occasionally lacking in pace, never dull.
Warren's performance is the stand-out in the cast as she plies her victims with poison-laced elderberry wine, but Barlow, Richards and Tompkinson all acquit themselves well enough. Rupert Vansittart, too, as the profoundly barmy Teddy Brewster - who believes he's actually Teddy Roosevelt and that the graves he digs for his aunts are the beginnings of the Panama Canal - is excellent, while Paul Rider does a great Peter Lorre impersonation in the role of Doctor Einstein.
At times, the British cast members sound as if they could use more coaching on their American accents, and the play feels a little dated and, with two intervals, a little on the long side. But these gripes aside, Arsenic and Old Lace remains a fun night out. Look for anything more profound and you'll be disappointed, but if you want a good story, some good performances and a fair few belly laughs, it's a safe bet.
Saw it on the opening night, I was very pleased with the show, not quite what I was expecting, and the opening night hiccups were evident. But the point is the show was well staged, with intentional execution that whilst seemingly stiff and jointed was a entertaining experience.
I would say the star of the show was Micheal Richards, I enjoyed his twsited anticts and his final ploy to get even in the body stakes.
There were a few times when I thought, wow I wonder if they will do that, and the reaction was far less stiking and more dulled, and moments where some inspiration came from nowhere.
Muscial lovers who like all that jazz stay away, butfor those people who loved to see the look on a face as something dreadful or amazing dawns on them, you missed you chance! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.8.166.28)
28 Jul 03
I enjoyed it. Yes the accents wavered and Teddy and Jonathan didn't look exactly like TR and BK, but it was entertaining. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (192.39.93.41)
02 Jun 03
TERRIBLE . Left in the interval. What a mess of a show. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.50.14)
16 May 03
Wonderful, a great evening out. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.50.13)
01 Apr 03
The whole point of the Teddy character is that he's supposed to look and act like Teddy Roosevelt, and he doesn't. The whole point of the Michael Richards character is that he's supposed to look and act like Boris Karloff, and he doesn't. (Have he and the make up man ever seen a Karloff film?) The whole point of the central character is that he's supposed to be panicky, and he isn't. The whole point of the play is to be funny, and it isn't. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.85.10.64)
18 Mar 03
I thought it was brilliant. I`ve admired Stephen Tompkinson for many years, but never seen him act live. I wasn`t disappointed. He was fantastic, very funny & had great timing.
Micheal Richards was great & with his sidekick Paul Rider they made the play.
Thelma Barlow & Marcia Warren worked extremely well together. Also Rupert Vansittart gave a convincing performance.
However I found that Hattie Morahan over-acted especially in the first act.
So glad I went & My Nan who came with me (on 8th March) as her Birthday present was full of praise for the actors. Nan of course remembers the film with Cary Grant. At first she found it hard to except Stephen in his part, but came away suitably impressed with his portrayal.
Both Nan & I are considering going again.
From Erica Branson - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.225.186.207)
16 Mar 03
Poor Thelma Barlow. You can take the actress out of Corrie, but you can't take the Corrie accent out of the actress. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (141.228.156.225)
06 Mar 03
Whoever wrote: Who really CARES if some of the accents were a little less than American? I seem to recall Dick Van Dyke's "Cockney" accent in Mary Poppins as being somewhat less than accurate!
Are you insane?
You cannot hold up Dick Van Dyke's appalling performance in Mary Poppins as an example of something GOOD.
I despair. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (141.228.156.225)
06 Mar 03
Yes it is long. Yes the accents wobble violently (both Barlow and Tompkinson see-saw between Manchester and mid-Atlantic). And yes, it is more slapstick than it needs to be. But is is a hoot and it got genuine laughs, mostly when Barlow/Warren or Richards/Rider are involved. Not a 5, but not far short of the mark either - a worthy revival. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (193.128.173.20)
05 Mar 03
I had forgotten this play was set in Brooklyn, and none of the actors' accents helped remind me.
Too many Brits believe there is only one "American Accent" and in this play it rarely survives past the interval.
Surprised to see so many WoS members defending this sort of sloppiness. Of course accent/authenticity of character is important - that's what acting is about. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.50.13)
Opened 22 May 1905, originally the Waldorf, became the Strand in 1909 and the Whitney in 1911, back to the Strand in 1915. On 8 Oct 1940 the theatre was hit during a bombing raid - the show went on! There had been an earlier Strand Theatre where the Aldwych tube station now is that opened in 1832. 1061 seats. Member of the Society of London Theatre. On 25 March 2003 Delfont Mackintosh Theatres Limited, which had owned the freehold of the theatre since 1991, took over the management of the Strand from the Louis I Michaels Ltd Group of Companies when their lease expired. Delfont Mackintosh is now planning a 1.5 million refurbishment programme to restore the theatre to its former glory. May 2005 opened as Novello Theatre.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.