Synopsis A melodramatic play, The Shaughraun, is a combination of a rollicking farce, a fish-out-of-water comedy and a gentle morality play. The dastardly Corey Kinchela, the forces of the crown and a liberal dose of nineteenth century Fenian politics contrive to keep the various lovers apart. But in the end love will triumph with more than a little help from Conn the Shaughraun and his faithful dog Tatters.
Irish melodrama meets Riverdance: there was never any danger that this was going to be a bland evening, but the bejasus shenanigins (it’s catching) going on at the Albery unnecessarily gilds the shamrock. John McColgan, more used to controlling flashing Irish feet, has directed his cast to go all out for excess. And they don’t hold back.
Dion Boucicault’s 1874 comedy celebrates the daring of Conn the cunning shaughraun (translated as vagabond) in a rollercoaster plot involving a wronged heir, a grasping landlord and two well-bred colleens just waiting to be suitably married off. The villain of the piece is wicked Corry Kinchela (a moustachioed Stephen Brennan), bent on dispatching the noble Robert Ffolliott (Stephen Darcy), whom he has had wrongly imprisoned, and carrying off his bride-to-be.
Conn, likably played by an energetic Don Wycherley, is feckless but loyal and good-hearted, apparently sacrificing himself to save his young master’s life. Into this community, where no one speaks without a rolling eye or an extravagant gesture, comes the handsome, stiff-upper-lipped redcoat Captain Molineux (Rory Keenan). He’s soon transfixed by Robert’s spirited sister Claire, in which role [Fiona O’Shaughnessy] deploys her nipped-in waist and husky voice to advantage.
Coming in from the Abbey in Dublin, where it has been a component of the theatre’s centenary celebrations, McColgan’s production has a warm, well-worked-in feeling. The cast clearly all kissed the blarney stone at precisely the same moment and scamper confidently over Francis O'Connor’s substantial circling, granite-like set. The problem is that it can all get a bit exhausting for the audience and it’s difficult to bother much about the tensions of the plot if everything’s good for a laugh.
And what happened to Boucicault’s subtle political comment on English colonialism? It’s been replaced by a simpler world of goodies and baddies, all mugging like mad. Kinchela and his ginger-suited side-kick must be hissed and booed and the brave hero cheered. In case we don’t think of it ourselves, a voice orders us to react appropriately before the play begins.
The 1988 National Theatre production of The Shaughraun was more satisfying because there was variety of mood and rhythm, more space for characterisation and a genuine desire for a happy outcome. Here there’s a circus atmosphere from the start with a conjurer making fire and directing the curtain to disappear and allow the action to begin. The play ends with Conn’s beloved dog - a stangely somnambulant mutt in this hyperactive company - being magicked into view in a gilded cage.
Melodrama originally, as the word implies, included music and that’s beautifully integrated here, from the inevitable drum rolls to the soulful keening over Conn. Needless to say, the jigs are pretty fine too. But the overall effect is, unfortunately, one of stage-Irish self-indulgence.
A good fun evening in theatre - a real feel good evening - something that anyone from eight to eighty should enjoy and leave the theatre smiling. It is not Shakespeare it is rip-roaring yarn played to the hilt by an excellent cast. If you normally take children to see musicals this may be an excellent alternative for a holiday treat. - 212.85.1.201)
13 Jun 05
My Dublin contacts told to not to miss this show when it came to London. So myself and a friend attended a preview performance and we were not disappointed! I'm neither a fan of melodrama nor panto (I tend to go for serious drama rather than comedies) but this Shaughraun really was entertaining. I haven't had such a good laugh for ages - the man in front of me was wiping tears of laughter away throughout the whole show. The overheard comments from the other punters on exiting the theatre were all hugely positive. I was therefore very surprised to read the subsequent reviews from the salaried critics! I did not see the much-lauded 1988 National version they referred to but I do not think there is such a thing as a definitive production of any play. I also saw an excellent (Druid Theatre) production in the early 1980s and I see no point in comparing the two. The one or two quibbles I had about this Abbey production are not worth detailing as they didn't spoil the overall pleasure I got from the show. I think Boucicault would have been pleased to know that this lively, well choreographed production in the Albery is genuinely entertaining audiences (if not the opening night critics) more than a century after its debut. I have no hesitation in recommending this production (with Don Wycherley so charmingly protraying the scallywag Shaughraun) to friends and family. - 195.137.80.100)
12 Jun 05
This show has been criticised by those far more expert than me as being more a pantomime than a melodrama. All I can say is that this is a show that is almost beyond review, I saw the original Abbey Theatre production and the show has retained its freshness even with virtually the same cast.The show played to an audience of young and old all of whom seemed to enjoy it.Yes, it is over the top, yes it is full of stereotypes but it is a long time since I had such an evening of pure pleasure in the theatre and that must be worth something
Richard Sandler - 81.76.29.197)
09 Jun 05
This is a good show, great set, with very good actors, with one major problem. I don't think melodrama can be played effectively tongue in cheek. It prevents the show from creating its own world and eventually turns everything into a one-note joke, which sadly becomes a bit boring. In effect, the actors are too knowing, constantly acknowledging to the audience that they are not taking it too seriously. Only Frank Grimes knows how it should be done. He manages to be wholly within the story, with a wonderful performance, while at the same time enjoying himself. But everything he does is within the style and the world of the show. The other actors, all extremely capable performers, should be encouraged to go for it, without the need for signals to the audience. Even the love story could be moving if it was played within the play, rather than as a comedy charade. It's a great shame because this production isn't far from getting it right - it just needs to believe in its own world of melodrama.
- 213.123.205.8)
08 Jun 05
A jolly Irish 19th Century comic melodrama given a cracking 21st Century production. Everything about this revival is true to the spirit of the play, but takes advantage of modern staging possibilities. The set and use of music allow it to race along, there are some wonderful comic performances and the cast's infectious enthusiasm sweeps you away. It's only a romp, but it's a lot of fun and it's very welcome in the West End. - 81.134.200.235)
08 Jun 05
A good example of Victorian melodrama, but its still melodrama. Not everybody's cup of tea-not mine! The Vagabond shone through this partially dull production, providing the entertainment for the evening. Although a bit long, there were some very funny moments with excellent timings but not every joke suited every soul and some were just too obvious to be funny, while some grew old quickly. If you like soaps or pantomimes then this is for you, otherwise the melodrama style may set your teeth on edge. - 217.40.187.105)
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.