Synopsis When a college Professor agrees to meet a struggling student behind closed doors, their conversation yields only mutual misunderstanding...and an unexpected charge. As their antipathy turns ugly, it destroys lives, derails careers and ultimately leads to a cataclysmic event that no one could have expected. The play was presented at the Royal Court in 1993 with David Suchet and Lia Williams, and directed by Harold Pinter.
When it was first produced in the US exactly 12 years ago, and was subsequently seen at the Royal Court in a new production a year later, David Mamet’s Oleanna quickly became more than just a play. It was a cultural beacon – a talking point in itself, around which a fierce debate would rage.
Mamet has himself said it became “a succes de scandale, a handy French phase meaning everyone was so enraged by it that everyone had to see it”.
It remains one of the most combustible, combative plays of its decade, a taut, fraught and inflammatory work about the power and meaning of words, in an age of ‘political correctness’, and how their interpretation can become tools of manipulation, power and even violence, weapons to be vigorously wielded.
But aren’t we over it now? As performers like Ricky Gervais comically subvert the PC culture, haven’t we moved on? Not if a story in the Evening Standard on the same day that this West End revival of Oleanna opened is any indication. English National Opera has issued new guidelines to their employees on the subject of sexual discrimination at work, and the rules include the statement: “The use of affectionate names such as ‘darling’ will also constitute sexual harassment.”
Meanwhile, on stage around the corner from ENO at the Garrick, an everyday story of classroom politics, in which a young female student seeks to have an assignment that she failed re-marked, explodes into a blistering, volatile expose of the language of sexual politics that eventually has the student accusing him of rape.
She means the word in a sense that is both figurative (accusing him of exploiting his ‘paternal prerogative’ in class, adding, “and what is that but rape; I swear to God”) and then literal (applying the letter of the law to the way the professor tries to restrain her departure from the room after her report to the Tenure Committee threatens his promotion).
Two terrific American film actors, Julia Stiles and Aaron Eckhart, bring convincing, raging passion to the increasingly desperate journeys that this confrontation propels them along, and Lindsay Posner’s meticulous production - formally staged on Christopher Oram’s raised platform stripped bare of everything but a desk, a water cooler and a chair, with a skylight over it - maintains the darkening tension throughout.
Julia Styles was faultless in this intriguing play.
First act left me thinking what the hell is this all about, but act 2 and 3 had me gripped and I really hated Julia's character.. what an impact at the end as well.
- USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.35.141.121)
15 Jul 04
Good performances and an interesting story. It's not an easy ride, but it is worth effort. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (12.39.71.54)
01 Jul 04
It's one of these plays that makes you feel somehow tired and depressed after all, but it also gave me, an average teen-age girl, the side view of human, adult, ugliness and how we/they contradict or conflict wrongly/rightly.
Anyway, both actors were amazing! In the beginning, I quite didn't get the character of Carol but then the each process was built up by Julia Styles so well in each scene that I felt as if I knew what she had gone through between the scenes. Of course, the same thing goes to Aaron Eckhart's brilliant performance too.
Altough I enjoyed it, I very much don't want to think about this play again for next couple of months. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.158.233.19)
24 Jun 04
I went to see this play on Saturday night and overall I have to say it was great. My sister and I had half price tickets from the tkts booth and were in the second row - I agree that £35 for 90 mins is very steep. I knew a little about the play before I went but even so I found the first act very difficult to get into. Not because of the acting, but the script. There was an awful lot of unfinished sentences and talking over one another that it took a while to get a feel for what they were trying to say. It really did improve as it went on however and the final scene was incredible, if a little nerve-wracking for those sat too close to the stage - the front 3 rows all ducked in unison! I know that there is a tradition of putting down american film actors in the west end and admittedly we did go choose to see this particular play because of the two stars, but I do go to the theatre fairly regularly and I have to say they are both very talented individuals who are not in any way undeserving of appearing here. For all those who gave this a poor review after leaving in the interval I really do think you would have changed your mind had you stayed to the end. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.68.200.198)
14 Jun 04
The opening exchanges of staccato dialogue between these two irritatingly implausible characters is uncovincing and shortly becomes very irritating. Few sentances are finished - they hang stalled in the air awaiting the anticipated interruption. I've seen Mamet good but this is a stinker. Each character has been distorted out of plausible shape in trying to fit his plot scheme. I went back after the interval hoping things would improve but only good manners kept me from quitting this one before the end. (looking at the high proportion of young females in the audience I suspect there was an attraction other than the play here. Is that PC or what?) - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.184.237.34)
10 Jun 04
The play does'nt take you anywhere. I'm a woman and I found it hard to understand what made the character of the female student (played by Julia Styles), so angry. I don't think the fault is Julia's- she played her part rather well. I think the fault is Mamet's- he did'nt write the female character well.
The best thing- it is a short play.
- USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.219.73.92)
05 Jun 04
Stunning - packs a real punch. Only possible quibbles would be the inclusion of an interval, which kills the momentum dead, and Posner's direction, which leans towards making Carol an out-and-out bitch, rather than giving it ambiguity. Nevertheless, outstanding. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.152.159.26)
27 May 04
Bravo! As pointed a theatrical assault as it was a few years back...an excellent night out. Both actors are wonderful, especially Mr. Eckhart as a younger, sexier version of the character. He is perfect and heartbreaking as he tries to swim the riptide of political correctness. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (4.159.237.39)
23 May 04
I was thrilled that a play which is so thought provoking is being performed in the West End, rather than at a subsidised theatre. Eckhart and Stiles have absolutely cracked their roles - a super evening. And I rowed with my boyfriend for hours after. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.159.62.29)
12 May 04
Great to see this milestone play cast younger than usual and thereby give a boost to its characters' credibility. The performances slowly crank up the tension to breaking point so the climax is both horrifying and energising. You may find your reason and emotion pulling in opposite directions. It should give anyone with a brain plenty of scope for argument with friends or especially work/college colleagues. Just about the most 'relevant' play in London today. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.43.169.146)
Opened on 24 Apr 1889, funded by W.S. Gilbert. 675 seats. Bought from Andrew Lloyd Webber and now owned by Broadway producer Max Weitzenhoffer and Nica Burns.Society of London Theatre member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.