Synopsis Iphigenia, daughter of Agamemnon, is sacrificed to the goddess Artemis, to persuade her to grant the Greek ships a favouring wind on their way to conquer Troy. Agamemnon has become an ambitious politician, wavering in his motives, and a moral, if not a physical coward. Menelaus is also doubtful character. Achilles, to be sure, has something of a hero about him, but it is heroism of a very human youth, not of an adult Homeric warrior. As to Iphigenia, her character has been transformed from an unwilling victim into a true saint. She does not appear in Homer but tradition depict Iphigenia as a gagged, unwilling victim, appealing with her eyes, even at the moment of her death, for pity. In this play, she gives her life (much as Joan of Arc did) in accordance with what she regards as the 'divine will' and the needs of her country.
Dates: Opens 22 June 2004. Jun 1214,15,16,17,18,19,21,23,24, Jul 1,2,3,5,6,16,17,19,20,26,27,28, Aug 5,6,7,9,10,20,21,23,24, Sep 3,4,6,7at 19:45. Jun 22 19:00. Jun 19,24, Jul 3,17,28, Aug 7,10,21, Sep 7, Mats 14:30
If you believe some of the papers, the world has gone Greek drama mad. That's surely overstating the case, given that in the current climate, most people would think that Euripides is a Greek midfielder.
But with versions of Antigone and Ion already being performed, and now this, Don Taylor's translation of Euripides' last masterpiece, there is a sense that there is a hunger for these works.
Of course, when you take a play whose entire plot revolves around a war against a middle-eastern country, waged (for spurious reasons) by a western power, one would have to be blind not to see the contemporary parallels.
But Taylor's version overstates the case. He takes every opportunity to drop in a Gulf War reference; it's a bit like being beaten over the head with the complete works of Michael Moore. Surely the audience could have been credited with a little more intelligence? The play was originally written to draw Athenians' attention to the state of their own contemporary war. I doubt if they needed the parallels spelled out so graphically.
Taylor thinks that audiences respond to everyday language, so the poetry is kept to a minimum. That's fine in theory, but lines such as "Calchas is threatening to go public" sounds horrible - this is Greek drama as written by spin doctors.
Hildegard Bechtler has devised an impressive set and there's some effective lighting from Chris Davey but Katie Mitchell's direction disappoints. There's rather heavy use of on-stage mikes (an 'in' effect this year), leading to some words being lost, and there are some unnecessary slo-mo movements.
The chorus is represented by seven women, who flap and fuss and provide a comic touch that seems oddly out of place. At the climax of the play, when Iphigenia prepares herself for sacrifice and is garlanded with flowers, she is serenaded by some of the chorus singing “All things bright and beautiful”, while the rest pour water from watering can over here. It provides a somewhat surreal touch to what should be a dramatic moment.
What does rescue the production is a touching performance by Hattie Morahan as the unfortunate Iphigenia, and an even better one by Kate Duchene as the wronged mother, Clytemnestra. She superbly conveys the hurt of a bereft mother and, at the same time, one sees glimpses of the rage that will drive her terrible revenge. Justin Salinger's camp Achilles is a real bonus, captures the egocentrism of this Greek superhero. But Ben Daniels' Agamemnon disappoints, not really capturing the anguish of a father who must sacrifice his daughter or the weakness of a commander in thrall to his troops.
Ultimately, this works because it's such a powerful story. The image of an innocent child being sacrificed by a father is a recurrent myth and never loses its ability to move, but this could have been much better.
Powerful, intense, and haunting. A must-see. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.154.221.230)
08 Aug 04
If there were a score of 10, I would award it. This is without a shadow of doubt one of the greatest productions that I have seen in over 40 years of going to the theatre. It manages superbly to convey the appalling tragedy of this piece by the most simple of effects. The production gets to the heart of the play in a way that is exceptionally rare. It is devastating. All the performers give their very best performances to date and Moarahan, Duchene and Daniels are beyond praise. Bechter's set is sensational. The whole evening is a masterpiece. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.177.231.164)
07 Aug 04
Quite, quite dreadful. (No scope on your site for a zero score,but one star is too many.) - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.254.128.6)
02 Aug 04
Utterly superb from lighting to set design. katie Mitchell's direction is truly world class, the chorus stunning, the main roles revelatory. This is exactly what subsidised theatre should be about, quality, quality, quality and then excellence as well.
See it brfore is disappears. Three Sisters was a triumph as well. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.252.192.10)
21 Jul 04
When I made my season booking for the NT, Iphegenia didn’t appeal. Maybe it’s the title. Iphegenia at Aulis. Maybe you don’t want to see plays which you’re not sure how to pronounce. But Katie Mitchell’s Three Sisters was surely the overlooked gem amid last year’s National treasures. Forget Jerry, forget Travelex, the smouldering, exquisite Chekhov was the thing that really lasted. So why wasn’t I first in line for her Iphegenia? Maybe I wasn’t up for an oblique Greek. Oedipus, fine, but Iphegewho? Anyway, I was wrong. Deeply. It is extraordinary. As good as anything I’ve ever seen at the NT. It would be gripping stuff played straight, but Mitchell transplants it to what seems like an abandoned 1930s community hall or stately home. Why she does this isn’t thematically cogent, but that doesn’t actually matter. Her manoeuvre is just in making an abstract, godly drama entirely human. Her real coup is in transforming the traditional masked female chorus into a septet of dithery, jingoist housewives who come to gawk at the Greek celebrities and wave their flags. It ought not to work, but it’s a staggeringly effective idea. I was bewitched by their awkwardness, their manners, their obsequiousness. I would award them right now collectively whatever trophies the combined chorus of Jerry Springer reaped last year. And they perfectly reflect the play’s central concern about what roles women are forced to play in the wars of men. The incredulous faces they make when compelled to account the unfolding events say it all. But their obligation pales alongside that of the two lead females; the young Iphegenia who must be sacrificed to facilitate a male assault, and her mother Clytemnestra who must surrender her. Likewise I hope hope hope awards are lobbed at Hattie Morahan and Kate Duchene in their respective roles. They exude devastation. Morahan is strickening as she nobly accepts her fate; Duchene’s slow fracture from aristocratic veneer to heated vulnerability to unconsoled numbness is perfectly graded and very very moving. As a man I’m perhaps no judge of this, but I’m sure that both these performances and the manner in which Mitchell has interpreted the roles speak deeply of female pride and strength and resilience. It is the best play I’ve ever seen about women. But the men deserve their dues too. If the production feels, because of its 20th century setting, like a prequel to Mourning Becomes Electra which played in the same theatre last year and featured some of the same characters, it far surpasses that show in its male cast. Ben Daniels, Dominic Rowan and Justin Salinger are all tortured, complex and riveting. The design is detailed and evocative too. The scene when the wedding entourage arrives is just exquisite. A couple of slow-mo sequences aside (which seem to have no more resonance than the feeling that someone accidentally sat on the remote control), this really is as good as world class theatre gets. I can’t recommend it highly enough. Whatever Katie Mitchell directs next, I’ll be there without hesitation. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (194.81.216.130)
20 Jul 04
I loved it, haven't always enjoyed Ms Mitchell's productions, but thought this fine work. I particularly enjoyed the Pina Bausch type chorus of Chalcian women. The aupplause wasn't polite the night I saw it, the audience were rapt. Seems a love it or hate it production? Best thing I've seen for ages - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.43.178.100)
12 Jul 04
horrible misinterpretation of a beautiful and tragic play. it is supposed to tear the audience apart (as Aggamemnon's decision is supposed to tear him apart). pretentious and misguided rubbish. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (169.132.18.1)
12 Jul 04
What a bunch of verbose reviews..... A fresh approach to an ancient tale makes for a rewarding evening. True craftsmanship - the performances, the design and the staging - deliver this. But it was a bit uninvolving.......... - USER: Whatsonstage.com (172.140.112.77)
12 Jul 04
Katie Mitchell took a big step to taking an ancient Greek tragedy and setting it in the 1930s. Although this was a daring move to make it wasn’t a very affective one. Using 1930s ball room dancing to break the tension of the tragic story adds much needed humour to the performance. The story of the play is that Agamemnon (played by Ben Daniels) is the leader of the entire Greek army has to make the decision weather or not to sacrifice his daughter Iphigenia (played by Hattie Morahan) for the Gods, in order to grant him the much needed wind to sail his fleet to troy. Where he will launch an attack. For someone who doesn’t know a lot about Greek mythology, you would get very confused. Its hard to keep up with the play especially the some what hyper active 7 lady chorus. Hattie Morahan gave a powerful performance as Iphigenia. I found myself very attached with the character towards the end, on the edge of my seat, not only trying to keep up with story but also hoping that she would be ok. Another strong performance was given by Katie Duchene who plays her on scene mother. Her screams of “noooo” as rain very effectively falls on her in pathetic fallicy is a scene that I’ll defenatly remember. On the other hand Ben Daniels didn’t show his full potential. His back or face repeatedly turning away from the audience took away from the intensity of his performance. The setting of the play was impressive. The shaby run down setting set the scene, mood, and atmosphere perfectly for the play.
Personally I loved the drama effects used in the play. Slow motion is used very well, but I wasn’t shore what the effect was used for ?
Over all, an interesting viewing, worth seeing just for the intensity and few strong performances. But if Greek tragedy jumbled with 1930s fashion isn’t your thing… Stay clear.
Ozlem Baykaner - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.43.16.169)
07 Jul 04
Iphigenia at Aulis, is a Greek tragedy full of love and betrayal. It is a play which dipicts the myth of an army general who has been told to sacrifice his daughter to the Gods, in order to conjure a wind for his fleet to sail to Troy, in order to win back his brother's wife; Helen.
Katie Mitchel's production, set in the 1930s, incorporates comic relief in form of a dithery chorus. While this amusment worked and perhaps enhanced the production as a whole in some places, in other places it diverted the attention from the powerfull lines being delivered, and directed it towards the clutter of a dropped handbag or the agitations of a chorus member. This meant parts of the dialogue was lost, which proved essential in knowing what was happening.
Despite these criticisms, it proved an enjoyable experiences as i felt the actors' performance and emotions conveyed the story even when the lines and perhaps the delivery did not.
Agamemnon, the general (Ben Daniels, Finn Cutting it) portrayed the anguish of his dillema effectively. While the perfomances by his wife Clytemnestra (Kate Duchene, Ms Hardbrom The worst witch) and their daughter Iphigenia (Hattie Morahan) provided the majority of the emotion for the play. Their interaction brough me to tears towards the climatic end.
My advice would be not to make this a first theatre trip, but make it a must see for those interested in Greek mythology. Overall an intersting and effective angle to a classic, that perhaps allows the play to be accessed by many others than it would if Mitchel followed a conventional route.
By Alana Daly - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.34.14)
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.