Synopsis Spanning a period of 15 years, this moving, brilliantly written piece traces the intricate relationship of two neighbouring couples. Jane and David are successful, happy professionals while Sheila and Colin are angry, insecure and isolated. Benefactors explores the interplay between politics and architecture, those who help and those who are helped, those who create and those who destroy. Michael Frayn's highly acclaimed play was premiered in 1984 at London's Vaudeville Theatre and won the Olivier Award for Best Play that year. It later played on Broadway with an American case including Glenn Close and received a Tony Award.
Is there a more chameleon-like writer than Michael Frayn? Or, to put it another less flattering way, a more inconsistent one? Can it be that the same man who wrote the scorchingly funny Noises Off also wrote the psychologically penetrating Copenhagen? And can it be the same man who wrote either of those who also wrote the earnestly didactic Benefactors?
This 1984 play - whose original West End cast included Brenda Blethyn and whose subsequent Broadway company featured (in a different role) Glenn Close - puts the social policy of modern architecture and housing under the spotlight. It follows an architect, David, as his plans to build a new south London housing estate go ever skyward, but are doomed to remain earthbound.
This professional crisis is played out against the background of the shifting personal relationships of two couples to each other and themselves: David and his wife Jane; and their ex-University pal and now neighbour Colin and his mousily defeated wife Sheila. In observing these fractured, sometime fractious, friendships, Frayn's play is at its liveliest, and gets commensurately edgy, constantly shifting performances from its new company.
But the issue-driven part of the drama has survived less successfully. While talk of skyscrapers being a hazard to low-flying aircraft get an uneasy laugh in this post-11 September time - and a reference to a pair of towers being like two giant tombstones is even more unfortunate - the questions that underline it, about the sorts of communities people want to live in, have not dated. If anything, they have become more pressing, as the housing stock has diminished in London to a crisis level that means key workers can no longer afford to live here. Against that context, however, the play now emerges as idealistic rather than realistic, and preachy rather than pointed.
Nevertheless, in Jeremy Sams' coolly precise production, there's a quartet of beautifully observed performances that raise the stakes as high as they can go from Aden Gillett and Sylvestra Le Touzel as David and his wife Jane, and from Neil Pearson as Colin, who turns into a campaigning enemy against David's skyscraper plans, and Emma Chambers as his wife Sheila who goes to work for David.
While Sams previously directed Frayn's Noises Off at the National, this one looks, in Robert Jones' design, like it's actually set there, amongst the grey breeze block concrete of its South Bank walls. The piece culminates in a visual coup de theatre that articulates in a second what the play has been attempting all night.
Great cast, Good performances. Average script - USER: Whatsonstage.com
31 Jul 02
Great play with marvelous performances. I'm recommending it to all my friends. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
19 Jul 02
I had read some pretty bad reviews about this play, however I thoroughly enjoyed it. I was impressed by all the performances, particularly Neil Pearson who is a favourite of mine! I disagree with the critics who said it is dated, and will certainly be recommending it to other people... - USER: Whatsonstage.com
17 Jul 02
I really loved this play. Not only did it have meaning, it also had subtle humor. The acting was great. Every actor performed well. Anyone wanting an enjoyable evening of sophisticated comedy should see Benefactors. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
14 Jul 02
I thought the piece was a penetrating analysis of parallels between personal and professional creationa and destruction. The debate about how humans relate to one another - through personal and professional issues - remains as relevant as ever. I was confused by the costumes - it was not clear that the characters were meant to be in the late 1960s or mid-1980s. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
12 Jul 02
Really poor play and was nearly empty and not surprised how they think people will be daft enough £35 for this very short boring play is beyond me.
I paid £15 and felt robbed! - USER: Whatsonstage.com
10 Jul 02
This is a great show with excellent dialogue and very strong performances. It is as relevant today as it was when it was written.
What's more, I went with a group organised by Whatsonstage.com and the cast came to join us for drinks afterwards.
I really loved the play. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
04 Jul 02
I thought it was fab, really enjoyable evening. emma chambers and aiden gillett were the best and i got to meet them both at the drinks afterwards - I went on the wos outing last night. great! - USER: Whatsonstage.com
04 Jul 02
Nice cast on paper but shame about the play. So dated. Why revive this? - USER: Whatsonstage.com
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.