Synopsis When Harry Met Sally spans a dozen years - the hilarious tale of two New Yorkers and the friendship that develops between them as they date (other people rather than one another!) and share the trials and tribulations of relationships.
Replacement casts are frequently viewed as the poor cousins of their role originators. Not so in the case of When Harry Met Sally.
At the Theatre Royal Haymarket, Molly Ringwald (famous from her 1980s teen flicks The Breakfast Club, Pretty in Pink and Sixteen Candles) and Michael Landes (apparently best known from American TV shows like Lois and Clark, though I have to admit I’d never heard of him before) have now taken over from Alyson Hannigan (Buffy the Vampire Slayer, American Pie) and Luke Perry (Beverly Hills 90210) in the stage versions of the screen roles immortalised by Meg Ryan and Billy Crystal.
While Landes and Ringwald may, in terms of current cachet, be smaller names than Perry and Hannigan, they make a much bigger impact. Individually, both West End newcomers seem at ease on stage, and they capture, with real assurance and comic sensitivity, their characters’ quirky vulnerabilities.
Collectively – and crucially – they also create genuine chemistry. By the end of their on-again, off-again relations, you are really rooting for this Harry and Sally (and what’s more even forgetting to compare them to their screen forebears). Britons Dexter Fletcher and Susannah Wise also succeed in staking their own claims and filling out the slighter characters of Harry and Sally’s best friends and newlyweds, Jack and Marie.
The concept remains flawed (what’s the point of putting this on stage in the first place?) and Loveday Ingram’s production, with Ultz’s annoyingly screen-shrunk stage design, remains creaky and cumbersome. However, this new cast allows you to forgive much much more. They give this sweetly romantic, if overly familiar, story its charm back in an evening that’s suddenly become highly entertaining.
- Terri Paddock
NOTE: The following review dates from February 2004 and this production’s original cast.
Last year Matthew Perry (the Friends star) came to the West End in a tale of Sexual Perversity in Chicago. Now Luke Perry (the Beverley Hills 90210 star) is here in a story of a 12-year courtship that’s finally consummated, a play that could have been called Sexual Consummation in Manhattan.
That gives away the ending, I know. But then, the ending’s not only already known to anyone who has seen the film When Harry Met Sally that it’s based upon, but is telegraphed right from the beginning for anyone who hasn’t.
Though there isn’t therefore much tension in the journey, there should be some texture and charm along the way. But, like Sexual Perversity, this piece’s dramatic template features a series of short, supposedly snappy, scenes that revolve around the gulf of expectation between men and women, whether as friends or eventually lovers, that mitigate against it.
It’s sitcom writing in which the development (and any major life changes) of the characters happens offstage during the passage-of-time scene changes. The determination of director Loveday Ingram and especially designer Ultz to frame the proceedings cinematically also makes one wonder why we’re watching it in a theatre at all.
We might just as well have stayed at home and watched the original film on video. But then, it occurred to me on the press night, we were already, in a sense, doing exactly that. Albeit in an inferior re-make that gently nudges its original time frame a little forward towards a more immediately contemporary setting; employs somewhat less stellar stars though nevertheless still recognisable faces (Perry’s Harry is joined by American Wedding and Buffy the Vampire Slayer star Alyson Hannigan’s Sally); and can even be seen in a ‘letterbox’ edition that truncates the action into neat, precisely edited cinematic frames that don’t allow you the choice of where to look but tell you exactly where to direct your gaze.
Designer Ultz has installed a false proscenium that’s half the height of the actual one, within which there’s a rectangular white box on which the different scenes – from Manhattan apartment and gym to office, restaurant and bedrooms – are variously set. It also has the annoying effect of invariably cutting off the actors at the knees.
Marcy Kahan’s stage adaptation of Nora Ephron’s original script, however, is exactly what’s promised on the menu. However, unlike the customer in the diner who, in a re-creation of the movie’s most famous scene, hears Sally ’s fake orgasm in the adjoining booth and declares to the waitress “I’ll have whatever she’s having!”, I’d rather eat elsewhere. (The fact that the customer is a man, not a woman as in the film, is the only switch to the scene onstage.)
This is the theatrical equivalent of fast-food. Only place your order here if you like to know exactly what you’ll be getting and have it delivered quick, slick and somewhat flavourless.
i saw it tonight and i liked it, but Willow has REALLY put on weight, like loads, and she looks kinda old now. i know buffy ran forever but i didnt think she was late 30s yet...
- USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.154.173.105)
22 Jul 04
An admission first; I've never seen the film. OK, so you know I'm a man now. And guess what? It was the mens' performances that really stood out. I had expected Molly Ringwald to be taking the plaudits for this, but came away remembering very strong performances from Michael Landes and Dexter Fletcher. Landes in particular shone, treating the audience as an integral part of the show and using their energy to lift a somewhat clichéd, but generally amusing script. Fletcher was a more than capable support and his timing excellent.
Contrary to some earliier reviewers, I don't think the need to have a set that squarely placed this in New York was required. Subtle lighting changes added to the depth of the performance, as I wasn't taken away wondering how they built this or that part of the set.
It's flawed; the origins of the script are firmly embedded in the romcom film genre and they show in the pace of the show - the second half especially. The performances are generally excellent (as I said) although my companions comment about Ringwald's 'whining' has a certain resonance still.
Go and enjoy it - it won't change your world, it won't change your life, but may make your soul feel a little more enriched at the end.
Additionally, we were lucky insofar that the slow sales in mid-summer meant, by ordering an Upper Circle seat, we got an upgrade to the Royal Circle. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (172.172.13.122)
18 Jul 04
michael landes was SO sexy and was really great...
molly ringwald was good too - she lacks a certain warmth and is a bit too self-indulgent but on the whole she was pretty good :-) i really enjoyed my evening - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.154.173.105)
17 Jul 04
The replacement cast make this show wonderful. Totally professional acting from everyone. Superb sets, costumes and music make a Theatre night to remember.
However, more should be said about the Actors in the Film sequences, used throughout the play, which 'move' the story along, gelling it together. Absolute professionals in each clip, definitely no replacements, which perhaps says it all!
May it run forever!! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.78.126.250)
23 Jun 04
awful, total miscast of American "Wannabe" actors. Only hardcore fans of them would enjoy something like this. And they writing good reviews. Why? It isn`t. Save your monay and go to a better play. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (218.39.19.73)
13 May 04
A very enjoyable evening. Great comic timing by all the actors and good sets and costumes.
Well worth going to see. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (12.39.71.54)
06 May 04
I was'nt sure what to make of this play, but in the end I am glad I went. With a story so well known and so many scenes, it was hard to imagine how it would be staged. The simple settings worked well. There was just enough to give the right impression without cluttering a very minimlaist stage. From the back of the stalls, the Black frame was not a problem, although I imagine it was hard going at the front and would have looked very odd coming only half way up the proscenium. I was a little disappointed in the lighting. with only very limited top lighting and zero backlighting, everything was lit from the front. This is not a huge problem, except that Luke Perry successfully found a large number of dark areas when wandering round the stage during the park scene. Worth the effort? I think so. Will it emulate The Graduate and have an extended run? Probably not. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (194.200.154.253)
14 Apr 04
I thought this play was fantastic. Luke Perry was surprisingly brilliant and I have to confess that I didn't hold much hope for his ability as a stage actor. Alyson Hannigan was adorable and managed to transfer her talent to a theatre production without flaw. Luke and Alison interact superbly on-stage and I highly recommend going to see this play. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.207.86.42)
27 Feb 04
Got a great cheer at the end of sell out performance last night with a massive queue for returns beforehand and sales according to the box office are very good.
The Play has its moments, the set is stupid though like a Tv screen only half the height of the theatre with a black ledge that kept rising for no good reason and making the front 5 rows very restricted, only thing that was the boring I found after a while were "How we Met" stories apart from the last unexpected one!!
But all in all I enjoyed it and the cast of 10 were excellent and that monotone voice is Alyson Hannigan and had made her a big hollywood film star ,very good and believable she is too as Sally IMHO!! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.69.37.108)
26 Feb 04
What an awful mess. A boring evening... complelty flat... unfunny, badly designed- just white walls and a few bits of furniture, not suggesting new york at all...and alyson hammond's monotone delivery of the lines. Luke perry was fine, but she was a big mistake. Like the whole show. What the point in staging it is im not sure. LOTS of people left in teh interval. ANOTHER dud in the west end...its becoming alarming now. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.69.37.108)
Opened 29 Dec 1720. Closed in 1737 (partly for attacking the government), re-opened 1747. The current theatre opened on 4th July 1821 and was designed by Nash. The last theatre in London to use candles (1837). 888 seats. Society of London Theatre member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.