Synopsis Classic family drama from the author of An Inspector Calls. It is 1919 and Mrs Conway, an easy going widow, and her daughters are enjoying a life filled with entertaining, laughter and young men. All have high spirits and high hopes for the future. But eighteen years later the optimistic aftermath of the first world war has faded and things have progressed not necessarily according to their rose tinted predictions. One of J B Priestley's finest plays, 'Time and the Conways' questions the concept of time, destiny and predestination. Production sponsors are N M Rothchild and Son. 25th Anniversary Season
Dates: Opens 10 December 2001. Mon-Fri 19:30, Sat 20:00, Except Mon Dec 10 at 19:00, Wed/Sat Mats 16:00. Christmas Week Mats Wed 26 and Thurs Dec 27 at 14:30. No performance Mon Dec 24
The Royal Exchange first staged this JB Priestley family drama in 1973, which marked the play's first major revival since its 1937 premiere. That was, in fact, the first time Priestley released the rights and the author himself attended rehearsals. Now, almost 30 years later, the director of that highly acclaimed revival, Braham Murray, is directing this new production as part of the Royal Exchange's 25th anniversary celebrations.
The story of Time and the Conways begins in autumn 1919, with the family gathering for daughter Kay's 21st birthday. The six Conway children, confident in their youth and social position, look forward to a rosy future. In the aftermath of the Great War and its resulting tribulations, the world at large is looking to the future too, craving release and a return to a more carefree existence. Flashforward to autumn 1937 and another Conway conference, this time on Kay's 40th birthday. Instead of being an occasion for celebration, this time we find the family touched by tragedy and circumstance, with another war looming.
As in so many of his works, Priestley toys here with the nature of time, raising some intriguing questions. Is destiny mapped out or, with premonition, can a person re-determine their future? And can the text itself really be believed - have these changes in fortune really occurred to the Conways or are they only a glimpse of what could happen? It's interesting to remember that, while the play was written in 1937, it accurately predicted the outbreak of the Second World War.
Sadly, although such explorations are always thought-provoking, Time and the Conways brings little else to contemporary audiences and, as a result, feels very past its prime. The characters themselves are walking time capsules. They're far too jolly for one thing - did people really say "golly" and "gosh" so much? - which makes it difficult for the actors to avoid coming across as overblown and faintly ridiculous.
Still, Murray has assembled a talented company who give it their all. In the role of Mrs Conway, Gabrielle Drake ages poignantly (although for the elderly matron, she does seem to have found overmuch inspiration in Julie Walters' Mrs Overall). And there are strong performances from Sarah Kirkman as Kay, the family's budding author; a very funny Naomi Frederick as 'baby' Carol; and Jessica Lloyd as idealistic Madge, who becomes a bitter school marm once her hopes are dashed.
Johanna Bryant, who designed the 1973 production, re-creates a wonderfully homey period living space for the Conways, and this is enhanced by some exquisite costumes and Robert Bryan's clever lighting.
Overall, the Exchange's re-run of Time and the Conways is a memorable production, high on atmosphere and effort, if somewhat outdated and overacted.
Hallo...I did not worry about the period language or manners...it is a period piece after all. But what concerned me a bit was that the shock third act, when Priestley's trick is revealed, cannot have any impact in this particular theatre, as we have all sat through the scene change. I can imagine the impact as the curtain rises/or the lights come up on the third act and it not what we were expecting. To get a similar effect, if I had been directing this I might have played the whole play, with no interval at all, and the time periods are literal jump cuts, as Ayckbourn has done since. Of course this would not allow for any change of the nice period furniture that the exchange gets obsessed with, but there would be nothing wrong with a more abstract approach, with the same furniture doing for the different periods. I think this would give the play a more dramatic impact. Any thoughts.....
yes a shame about Mrs Overall, but I quite liked Ms Drake otherwise. she certainly has a sparkle. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
09 Jan 02
Val Bennion's crit is spot on. The play certainly feels its age and has a 'Five Go Mad in Dorset' air about it. A whole row of people gasped at Mrs Conway's likeness to Mrs Overall (aka Julie Walters). I also felt that her eldest son was largely modelled on Captain Flasheart (aka Rick Mayall) from the Blackadder series. That said, the production values were typically high and, after a pedestrian first act, there was plenty of drama and humour to enjoy. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
St Ann's Square Manchester Greater Manchester M2 7DH
Telephone
0161 833 9833
Station
Description
Closed by Manchester bombing 1996. Reopened Dec 1998 with a new 120 seat studio space added. Seats 750. Founding sponsor of The Studio - Selfridges and Co.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.