Synopsis Sequel to The Phantom of the Opera. Love Never Dies is set ten years after the conclusion of the original story. The Phantom has escaped to New York with Madame and Meg Giry and found success in Coney Island as a magician and entertainer. When he builds a new opera house, he persuades his old ingenue Christine Daae, now a huge star and married to her old flame Raoul, to sing for him once more...
Sierra Boggess & Ramin Karimloo in Love Never Dies
Date: 10 March 2010
Critics have now had their first glimpse of Love Never Dies, Andrew Lloyd Webber's much-heralded follow-up to The Phantom of the Opera, which premiered at the Adelphi Theatre last night (9 March 2010, previews from 22 February), following two weeks of previews that have seen unprecedented levels of Internet chatroom and blog discussion and speculation (See Also Today's 1st Night Photos).
The story is set in 1907, ten years after the conclusion of the original story. The Phantom has escaped to New York with Madame and Meg Giry and found success in the fairgrounds of Coney Island as a magician and entertainer. When he builds a new opera house, he persuades his old ingenue Christine Daae, now a huge star and married to her old flame Raoul, to sing for him once more...
Overnight reviews - on both sides of the Atlantic - run the gamut of opinion, with little consensus in sight. Depending on your choice of critic, Lloyd Webber's latest is either a work of “genius” or an “also-ran to the prequel”. The score certainly fared better than the lyrics and libretto, with more than one critic labelling it musically “one of the composer's most seductive” to date. However, the multi-authored book was heavily criticised by some for its lack of “narrative tension”, while Glenn Slater's lyrics were deemed “clunky” or “serviceable” at best. However, on the positive side, there were at least two five-star raves and no shortage of claims that Love Never Dies is Lloyd Webber's “finest show” since Phantom itself.
Michael Coveney on Whatsonstage.com (five stars) - “The first thing to say is: this is not just a sequel. The sensational score of Love Never Dies, jagged with yearning, throbbing with melancholy, purple with pain, is both a continuation and a development of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s The Phantom of the Opera music, not something manufactured to further exploit the most successful musical of all time. Phantom ‘phans’ and bloggers who have been bitterly pronouncing their rights in the original should instead be counting their lucky stars we have one genius at least in the British musical theatre who, virtually single-handed, is keeping the genre alive and creating new landmarks … Ramin Karimloo’s handsome young Phantom, half-masked in white still (yes, logically he should be older, but we can relax about this, folks, it’s a brand new musical, too) has re-visited his one-night tryst with Sierra Boggess’ ravishingly beautiful Christine 'Beneath a Moonless Sky' … Lloyd Webber has fashioned a deeply personal story once again of re-awakening his own talent.”
Charles Spencer in the Daily Telegraph (four stars) - “I must admit I attended Andrew Lloyd Webber’s long-awaited sequel to his world-conquering Phantom of the Opera with a degree of trepidation… What I have no doubt about whatever is that this is Lloyd Webber’s finest show since the original Phantom, with a score blessed with superbly haunting melodies and a yearning romanticism that sent shivers racing down my spine… Jack O'Brien’s production … seems entirely in tune with Lloyd Webber’s vision, conjuring a world of bright electric lights and dark shadows, dancing girls and grotesque freaks, unbuttoned hedonism and hearts that have turned septic with jealousy and hatred… It seems extraordinary that it should have taken four hands to write the not especially complex book, among them Lloyd Webber, Ben Elton, and Frederick Forsyth, while Glenn Slater’s lyrics strike me as serviceable rather than inspired. But the music is a constant pleasure.”
Paul Taylor in the Independent (five stars) - “The original musical agonised over the possibility of unconditional love in a relationship of beauty-and-the-beast opposites and mutual professional inspiration. Add a child to the equation and (depending on your view of this young character's artistic provenance) it all becomes more tortuously complex or emotionally bogus. What is in no doubt is the technical excellence of Jack O'Brien's seamlessly fluent, sumptuous (and sometimes subtle) production, or the splendour of the orchestra which pours forth Lloyd Webber's dark-hued, yearning melodies as if its life depended on them… In a sense, Lloyd Webber has become hoist by his own petard. Having over-petted the public, he is now being badly mauled by a section of it – the Phantom fanatics who feel that they own the original more than he does. On both counts (casting and the right to do what he likes with his own material), Lloyd Webber has, for once, the moral high ground here. Ramin Karimloo may not be a physically imposing enough presence as the Phantom, but his marvellously supple voice can run the gamut from a seductive guttural whisper to the full blare of frustrated passion.”
Michael Billington in the Guardian (three stars) - “There is much to enjoy in Andrew Lloyd Webber's new musical. The score is one of the composer's most seductive. Bob Crowley's design and Jack O'Brien's direction have a beautiful kaleidoscopic fluidity. And the performances are good. The problems lie within the book, chiefly credited to Lloyd Webber himself and Ben Elton, which lacks the weight to support the imaginative superstructure… What the show lacks, in a nutshell, is narrative tension. For Christine, having discovered her employer's true identity, the big question is 'to sing or not to sing?'. The result is a foregone conclusion... At his very best – as in Joseph, Jeeves, The Phantom of the Opera and Sunset Boulevard – Lloyd Webber's melodic inventiveness matches the material; here you have a welter of great tunes in search of a strong story … Ramin Karimloo's Phantom may not have the tragic quality of Michael Crawford's prototype but that is hardly his fault: the character is now more a mildly disabled Kane (of the Wellesian variety) than a social pariah. Sierra Boggess also displays a strong, vibrant soprano as Christine.”
Benedict Nightingale in The Times (two stars) - “Oh, how time and a dismally implausible plot have altered him and his life… The blogosphere has been teeming with views of Lloyd Webber’s long-awaited Phantom II … The title song has pretty clunky lyrics, insisting as it variously does that love is all, endures, never fails, remains, drives you to despair 'yet forces you to feel more joy than you can bear'; but it undeniably soars… But then this Phantom is not the phantom we knew. The 'poisoned gargoyle who burns in hell' has clearly taken an anger management course in New York. True, he fills his eyrie with oddities, like the skeleton who pushes a cocktail trolley, but he’s very much the considerate gentleman, eager impresario and, soon, doting father... So where’s the tension in Ben Elton and Lloyd Webber’s book?… Where’s the menace, the horror, the psychological darkness? For that I recommend a trip to Her Majesty’s, not the Adelphi.”
Ben Brantley in the New York Times - "Of course, bad advance word on the Internet has sometimes proved false. (Ever hear of Avatar?) And I would be delighted to tell you that’s what happened here, especially since Love Never Dies is scheduled for Broadway this fall. But how can I, when at every opportunity Mr. Lloyd Webber’s latest sets itself up to be knocked down? ... For starters, the title, with its promise of immortality, was just asking for trouble. And its breathless solemnity pervades the show’s every aspect. This production keeps such a straight face, it’s as if the slightest smile might crack it ... If this show could speed up and loosen up it might be (marginally) more amusing. As it is, only a couple of sequences are campy enough to elicit 'whoa, nelly' smiles ... Relax, I’m not going to tell you who dies (while gasping out a reprise of the title song). Why bother, when from beginning to end, Love Never Dies is its very own spoiler."
Quentin Letts in the Daily Mail - “Love Never Dies … is as slow to motor as a lawnmower at spring’s first cut... Finally, the singing and the ingenious staging combine to show the Lloyd Webber orchestration to its full glory, but, boy, it takes an age… The first scene is memorable only for an expensive backdrop of the Coney Island shore, with exaggerated perspective and projections of a horse dancing through smoke. There is repeated use of this technique: moving images thrown on to a gauze screen at the front of the stage. It may be clever but it has little to do with dramatic art and cannot compensate for the lack of solid storytelling… Sierra Boggess, as Christine, is the production’s great joy - its show saver. She has a soprano of porcelain precision and her scene 4 duet with ten-year-old Gustave (excellent Harry Child), brushed by harp, is the first of three quick songs which rescue the evening… So: a hit? Not quite. It is too much an also-ran to the prequel, and its opening is too stodgy. But if it is a miss, it is - like Christine - a noble miss, noble because Lloyd Webber’s increasingly operatic music tries to lift us to a higher plane.”
Henry Hitchings in the Evening Standard (two stars) - “This companion to The Phantom of the Opera ... seems a strange venture, radically at odds with the spirit of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s earlier cult musical... The chief problem is the book... It lacks psychological plausibility. Worse, it lacks heart... There is also scarcely a moment of humour... Lloyd Webber’s score contains some compensating moments of mellifluous lushness, as well as grandiose flourishes and lashings of sentimentality... In the vocally demanding role of the Phantom, Ramin Karimloo wants a certain charisma. His burnished high baritone stretches impressively, yet physically he’s underwhelming. Meanwhile, as Christine, Sierra Boggess gets to display her silvery soprano voice, but her acting proves limited... The design, conceived by Bob Crowley, is a thing of lustrous opulence... As a spectacle, Love Never Dies impresses... Yet while Lloyd Webber’s music is at times lavishly operatic, the tone is uneven. There are no more than a couple of songs that promise to live in the memory, the duets don’t soar, and the ending is insipid. Admirers of Phantom are likely to be disappointed, and there’s not enough here to entice a new generation of fans.”
Officially reopened after chops and changes anonymously implemented by Bill Kenwright, Love Never Dies is very much a sequel to the original Phantom of the Opera, audiences expected to understand the love triangle of the original with little prompting - now seen ten years on.
As the Phantom, Ramin Karimloo's launch number, "'Til I Hear You Sing", haunts the first act, mainly as it comes from nowhere and disappears just as quickly, the remainder of Act One stuttering forwards without another notable tune for a lengthy spell. The musical plods forwards expectantly waiting for the touch paper to be lit; unfortunately, it never is - characters enter and exit, for apparently little reason, too often to deliver lines from a lightweight book.
The entire production is a visual feast, with New York's Coney Island created beautifully with a mixture of huge sets, mystifying angled backdrops and stunning projection. However, the animated storytelling stretched between the proscenium never quite makes up for the lack of narrative or emotion delivered on stage.
Despite the tinkering, things still don't quite mesh, but it is worth noting that the second act is far stronger than the first. It also provides a vehicle for impressive performances - the slowly revolving Sierra Boggess delivering the tremendous operatic aria and title tune, demonstrating that the ingredients of a formidable piece of musical theatre are in there somewhere.
Karimloo also impresses, delivering across the score's forays into rockier territory and the more standard Phantom numbers and Summer Strallen delivers Meg's vaudeville numbers with aplomb.
The real issue with Love Never Dies is that it lacks the emotional depth and driving narrative of its predecessor. A strong cast and a handful of memorable tunes don't make up for a piece that still feels flawed.
- Andrew Girvan
Please Note: This FIVE-STAR review is from the production's original opening night on 10 March 2010 at the Adelphi Theatre.
The first thing to say is: this is not just a sequel. The sensational score of Love Never Dies, jagged with yearning, throbbing with melancholy, purple with pain, is both a continuation and a development of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s The Phantom of the Opera music, not something manufactured to further exploit the most successful musical of all time.
Phantom “phans” and bloggers who have been bitterly pronouncing their rights in the original should instead be counting their lucky stars we have one genius at least in the British musical theatre who, virtually single-handed, is keeping the genre alive and creating new landmarks.
For Love Never Dies is a romantic melodrama in a darker place even than the murky candlelit sewers under the Paris Opera. Ten years on, the Phantom has fled to Coney Island where his lavish art deco eyrie in the sky surveys the Sodom by the sea beneath, the sinister fairground literally conjured in Bob Crowley’s amazing design of whirling projections, gymnasts, a silver carriage, skeletons, freaks, bathing beauties and waltzers.
The still unnamed Phantom is atop this poisoned pleasure pile and has invited Christine Daae, now retired, to come and sing once more. His own music of the night has faded without her, and she returns with the now dissolute viscount Raoul (Joseph Millson), wrecked by gambling and drink, and a ten-year-old boy, Gustave; hovering in the wings, like Bette Davis playing Mrs Danvers, is Liz Robertson’s vengeful Mrs Giry, who helped the Phantom escape, hoping to establish her daughter Meg (gorgeous Summer Strallen) in his favour.
The key element is the child, who reveals the Phantom’s legacy as his own natural gift. His pure natal song “Beautiful”, initially distorted by the Phantom’s Dickensian trio of “helpers” (led by Niamh Perry, my preferred Nancy in the television contest), melds with his father’s – that’s the main revelation – pounding rock response “The Beauty Underneath”.
Ramin Karimloo’s handsome young Phantom, half-masked in white still (yes, logically he should be older, but we can relax about this, folks, it’s a brand new musical, too) has re-visited his one-night tryst with Sierra Boggess’ ravishingly beautiful Christine “Beneath a Moonless Sky”.
She goes on to sing the big operatic title song, pulverizing the hopes of Mme Giry and Meg and forcing the climax of confrontation expressed first in the brilliantly written quartet for the protagonists (“Devil Take the Hindmost”) and then resolved at the end of the mist-laden pier, with a plaintive child, an outbreak of madness and a fatal gunshot.
With director Jack O'Brien, lyricist Glenn Slater and co-librettist Ben Elton, Lloyd Webber has fashioned a deeply personal story once again of re-awakening his own talent, which in the Phantom’s case is an expression of sexual love, and meditating on the transmission of that talent from one generation to the next (from his own father, perhaps and onwards… to whom?). Expert musical supervision by Simon Lee, orchestrations by the ever crucial David Cullen, and lighting to die for by Paule Constable all contribute to this outstanding and heart-stopping occasion.
ABSOLUTELY PHENOMENAL. most definately worth going to see and anyone who says otherwise obviously can not recoqnise talent and enjoy to listen to those who can do what they cant. the songs were all sung flawlessly and it is an extrememly gripping plot we thoroughly enjoyed it.. it had more than a few of our group sobbing their eyes out - Emily
28 Jul 11
I AM UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHY ANYONE WOULD THINK THAT LOVE NEVER DIES IS NOT GOOD. IVE SEEN IT WHEN IT FIRST CAME OUT AND AFTER THE REVAMP. BOTH EXCELLENT. AS FOR NO REAL STOREY...ARE YOU MAD... IT IS AS GOOD IF NOT BETTER THAN PHANTOM OF THE OPERA. THE STOREY IS EXCELLENT, THE MUSIC SPINE TINGELING, THE SINGERS SUPERB. RAMIN WHO PLAYS THE PHANTOM, I HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED IN MY LIFE A VOICE SO MOVING AND BEAUTIFUL. FOR ALL OUT THERE WHO HAVE NOT RAVED ABOUT THIS SHOW, LISTEN TO THE MUSIC AGAIN, LISTEN TO THE WORDS,THERE IS A CLEAR STRONG STOREY LINE, WITH LOTS OF EXCELLENT SONGS NOT JUST ONE OR TWO. I LOVE LOVE LOVE THIS SHOW AND WOULD RECOMMEND EVERYONE TO SEE IT.ALW YOU HAVE DONE IT AGAIN. A MASTERPIECE. - ARLENE EDGE
19 Jun 11
OK, any ALW musical is going to be far better than any other musical in town, but there's only 2 good songs, a lack of original music, weak story, and all abit boring. ALW should have worked with some new fresh young talent to produce a new show - Andrew
25 Feb 11
I saw this show 5th feb without having seen it before the revamp, I thought it was a great show with some really fantastic music! Most of the negative reviews are totally unjustified!!! This show is not the flop critics would have you believe, Andrew lloyd webber has done it again!! 5 stars! - Brist75
05 Feb 11
Back in April when I first saw Love Never Dies I was not in the right frame of mind to fully appreciate a musical but that only partly explains my 2-star rating. News that the show had been revamped by Bill Kenwright, amongst others, and a substantial discount persuaded me to give the show another chance. The most obvious change has been to open the show with the Phantom and his one big song, but the story now seems to have greater clarity and there are more echoes of melodies from the original show. What hasn't changed is the leaden pace of the first half, particularly the set-piece reunion of the Phantom and Christine which fully justifies the famous subriquet of Paint Never Dries. There is still a sense of relief from the audience when we finally reach the beautiful title song, even if it is 20 years old. Sadly the ending remains essentially unaltered which has upset so many Phantom fans and I think is a major mistake on Lloyd Webber's part. Being a Lloyd Webber show of course one of the principals was off - Sierra Boggess again. I usually appreaciate musicals more on a second viewing and Love Never Dies is no exception. It's not a bad show, just not the great one that so many had hoped for from Lloyd Webber. It's interesting to note how many of his shows since Phantom have been drastically improved following a revamp or re-imagining which must cast some doubt on his original vision or wilingness to listen to criticism. Perhaps, like Sunset Boulevard and Aspects of Love we will have to wait ten years or so for a version of Love Never Dies which is fit to stand alongsdie the original Phantom. - David Baxter
06 Jan 11
'Persuaded myself to see the enhanced version of LBW's PND tonight. The opening scene is no longer reminiscent of Titanic (Stevie’s review 17.7.2010), and the audience is attributed with a little more intelligence. There are less video instructions, (‘three months later’), a bad habit in UK shows perhaps lifted from a trend in the USA? A FOH staff member commented that there were noticeably less patrons leaving the theatre in tears since re-versioning; surprising since the ending was improved and more powerful; albeit editing a few seconds could hasten the pace to conclusion and final curtain. At least Meg no longer has to sit there twiddling her thumbs whilst her mate fades way.
Inevitably the show has become a production by committee; the latest being Kenwright putting his four penneth in. I didn’t know they were such chums, perhaps he’s agreed to underwrite some of the sure-to-be losses should LBW venture into Broadway. It’s not that this show doesn’t deserve to succeed in NY but the yanks will have already watched its roller-coaster development and are primed on how to shoot it down. Our special relationship with the USA is all but dead and welcoming anything Brit’ is only if on their terms – a big chunk of the profits. So LBW, if you really must risk Broadway make sure 51% of the show is owned by Americansus.
My best wishes to a talented and hard working team at the Adelphi, simply A1. Loved it once again, tissues required.
- Stevie
06 Jan 11
This was a terrible show before the 'revamps'. Now it is, without doubt, the worst piece of crap in the history of Musical theatre.
Bill Kenwright has 're-done' the show after the sacking of anyone who knew what they were doing. Yes Kenwright the producer coming in to 'direct' the show. WHAT!!!!
The revamp is this. The Phantoms 'song' and the hilarious kylie minogue gold thing scene is now the opening of the show (including christine with arms by her side moving as if to say 'i-am-a-robot'). This means that all the exposition is removed, so if you don't know phantom at all you're screwed. The formally quite good opening has become the worst staging in a musical to date, which includes awful new lyrics to the overture.
ALW has thrown in far more musical references to phantom (in a very hurried and clunky way) any reference to the phantom and Christine phucking on her wedding night taken out, and a reworking of 'bathing beauty'. However if you've seen the show before it was precisely 'bathing beauty' and the opening that didn't need any work. It was the terribly dull long LOOOOOOONG duets in act one that needed the fat cutting out, and the terribly expensive but pointless automatons in the 'beautiful' sequence (which still has the awful monkey skeleton hybrid playing rock piano) to name but two of HUNDREDS.
It's terrible. There is no story, plot or anything resembling dramatic writing or dramaturgy, rather it is just a steam of words between people on a stage that don't really seem to know what it's all about either. The best solution to this would be to stop it and take it away and start all over again.
- Cassox
22 Dec 10
Well I am new to this and sorry not sure what has been done but it is still a mess.
Paper thin story and two great numbers, one done in Act One/Scene One which leaves us where to go??
Looked great (sets and lighting 5 star)but then again we have seen enough shows where you come out singing the set.
Keeping in mind one of the songs has already been used in another ALW show I say it's now time to put this away for good. - james tate
22 Dec 10
Poor show, Andrew, really disappointed. I'm told that the version of the show I saw recently had new changes put in - if this is supposed to be an improvement on what opened early this year, then I dread to think what the show was like beforehand. I just don't get it. What the hell has happened to all the characters? Why are they all so strange? Where did this insane storyline come from? Strangely enough the music is very disappointing as well. And the lyrics are atrocious, possibly the worst yet for a Lloyd Webber. Where's Tim Rice when you need him? - Kevin
06 Dec 10
Amazing amazing amazing. Ramin and Sierra are awesome. - B thomson
Originally the Sans Pareil built by a merchant called Scott to display the talents of his daughter. Opened on 27 Nov 1806 with Miss Scott's Entertainment. Became the Adelphi in 1819. The original theatre was demolished in 1858 and replaced with a bigger one which, with many alterations, remains. Restored to its 1930s form. 1500 seats. Society of London Theatre member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.