Synopsis Chicago provides a hotbed of opportunity for Danny and his friend Bernie, two red-blooded males playing the mating and dating game. Bars, libraries, beaches, they'll go anyway that the women are, the very places frequented by smarts girls like Joan and Deborah. Driven by impulses both primitive and subtle they grapple with themselves and each other in their desire to establish relationships or real fulfilment. The underscores a familiar dance, but the raw nerves and wry smiles provide plenty of belly-laughs as things fall apart. This play contains language that may cause offence.
Schadenfreude-fuelled stargazers will be disappointed by Sexual Perversity in Chicago: neither Friends funnyman Matthew Perry nor Briton-in-Hollywood actress Minnie Driver embarrass themselves in their West End debuts. That said, fans are unlikely to leave satisfied either. Although their two names take top billing, they're not the stars of the show. That distinction falls to Perry and Driver's less well-known co-stars, Kelly Reilly and, most especially, Hank Azaria.
This 1974 play first made the name of author David Mamet, who has since had huge success on stage and screen with the likes of American Buffalo, Speed-the-Plow, House of Games, Oleanna and the Pulitzer Prize-winning Glengarry Glen Ross. Written when Mamet was just 27, Sexual Perversity bears the hallmarks of his later work: rapid-fire - and often filthy - dialogue, misogynistic posturing and moral vacuousness.
The beaches, bars and bedrooms of Chicago provide the setting for the 30-odd, mating-and-dating scenes in the lives of four singles seeking emotional as well as sexual sustenance. When Dan (Perry) and Deborah (Reilly) tentatively embark on a live-in romance, they're undermined by their cynical, unattached friends, Bernie (Azaria) and Joan (Driver).
In under-drawn roles, Driver and Reilly (both British) sport faultless accents, while Reilly also exudes natural stage charm. Admittedly benefiting from the juiciest script fillets, Azaria is nonetheless sensational as bitter braggart Bernie, hilariously recounting outlandish tall tales of sexual prowess to mask, as his characters might say in modern American parlance, some serious childhood 'issues'.
It's somewhat hazy why Bernie should hold such sway over Dan, but what's crystal clear is that Perry - whose efforts to banish 'Chandler Bing' mannerisms are admirable even if the resulting deep-voiced bravado doesn't sit altogether naturally - raises his performance whenever he shares the stage with Azaria. The play's opening and closing shots, featuring the men in predatory mode, are by far the most memorable.
Perhaps because of screen reputations of his cast, director Lindsay Posner seems intent on highlighting the cinematic qualities of Mamet's writing - Jeremy Herbert's slick design (reminiscent of his Up for Grabs contributions) using sliding panels that zoom in from all sides to frame each scene like a camera's eye.
Unfortunately, rather than creating a film-like fluidity, these necessitate seemingly endless transitional pauses that, despite blasts of disco music and grainy projections of 1970s street scenes, make the play drag - no small feat considering it's only 80 minutes without an interval.
The most questionable production decision, however, has got to be the choice of staging Sexual Perversity in this manner in the first place. When performed elsewhere, it's usually conjoined with one of Mamet's other one-act plays (as in Sheffield's 2001 pairing of it with The Shawl). As it is, while certainly entertaining, this singular revival does not feel like a full evening - either in theatrical or value-for-money, star-spotting terms.
I thought the play was great, though I can see why some people would not like it, but not to the extent some people seem to dislike it. More for a younger audience I would say. Hank Azaria was brilliant as Bernie and Matthew Perry great as Danny. The scene changes were swift, flowed smoothly and the music fitting. A great night out. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.67.76)
01 Aug 03
Not as bad as previous critics have claimed but definitely Mamet light. Azaria and Reilly carry the show. This is Perry's first real "attempt" at theater so he can be excused but what is Driver doing in this production?
If you want to see real Mamet, try Edmund at the National. Branagh is brilliant. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (205.188.209.140)
18 Jul 03
Perry's performance is so bad that it was impossible to enjoy this performance. While the other performances were stronger, they were not enough to draw attention from the awefullness that is Perry, who is clearly a TV star, and not an actor. While Driver is not the strongest of stage actors to come from Hollywood in recent years, she at least copes, rather than stars. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.107.228.118)
17 Jul 03
Yes, seeing Matthew Perry from Friends on stage is fantastic, its just a shame that the production isn't!! The scenes change too quickly, and as a result I never felt the play fufilled the potential of its all star cast.
Stick to playing Mr Bing !! Your wasted in this production! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.17.114.58)
14 Jul 03
very funny play all the cast were grezat espaily matthew perry - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.194.18)
10 Jul 03
You can really see that they work hard on this, they haven't let it slip at all. As soon as the lights went down or the big shutters closed you could see them all running, ripping off clothes prematurely.. which although spoilt the magic of the 'wow' factor, was interesting to see.
Minnie Driver is the weakest link here, but this is for the way she's directed, plus her character isn't that great either. Hank Azaria is great, very funny and got quite a 'gasp' when he was topless. Matthew Perry speaks very on one level, kinda shouting to get himself heard.. he doesn't vary it at all - again, perhaps this is direction. Kelly Reilly is fantastic. This show is good but it is clunky. The scenes are irritably short sometimes but the longer ones are worth the wait.
- USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.35.56.7)
04 Jul 03
I know that it is a current trend for Hollywood stars to take to the London stage but at the expense of artistic integrity? I can honestly say that this is the first time I have nearly walked out of a west end production (had there been an interval I would have done). This play may have been shocking and new in the 1970's but is now just jaded and plain vulgar. Not even Matt Perry in yellow Speedo's could lift it, go back to Friends please it's a lot funnier with more attention to timing and dramatic detail. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.49.218.122)
01 Jul 03
Utter obscene Rubbish ,the acting is abysmal,the theatre dirty and disgusting and the view from the balcony is not worth 1p.
Minnie Driver wants to go back to Drama School and impossible to hear.
Hank Azaria is a wooden as hell and Perry god a lucky man to have made so much money with so little talent.
Kelly Reilly the only talent on show still fails with mamets dire script,to write such filth the man is sick!!
Dont waste your money and annnoys me so much that is rubbish is sold out and great shows are closing,the media have a lot to answer for.!! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (152.163.253.102)
29 Jun 03
I enjoyed this play thoroughly and though that all the cast played the characters they had to the fullest. The lack of interval did not bother me, it may seem unusual to some, but myself taking part in local theatre in my area, and having recently been in a play also with no interval, sometimes in the way a play flows, an interval would just not work. I go to the theatre to yes enjoy myself, but also to respect the fact that, even though they are professionals, they are still working up there and doing a job that I know is not an easy one and for that I give then my full attention and respect. It is a great chance to see these well known actors on stage, but to knock them down because they are well known, well that is just about as unfair as you can get. I enjoyed this play and it was a good night out. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.198.74)
15 Jun 03
Abysmal. The play failed to engage me and I was utterly bored well before the end. I felt the acting was ok, given the material, but the script was simply awful. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.123.195.235)
Opened 15 Oct 1881, designed by Thomas Verity and originally gas lit. 780 seats. An Ambassadors theatre since 2000 and renamed The Harold Pinter Theatre in September 2011 in recognition of the wide range of Pinter's plays that the theatre has hosted.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.