Synopsis Adapted for the stage by Joan Didion from her best-selling memoir of the same name, chronicles the aftermath of her husband's sudden death. 'Grief turns out to be a place none of us know until we reach it. We know that someone close to us could die. We might expect to feel shock. We do not expect this shock to be obliterative, dislocating to both body and mind. We might expect to be prostrate, inconsolable, crazy with loss. We do not expect to be literally crazy cool customers who believe that their husband is about to return and need his shoes.' Running time 90 minutes with no interval.
Joan Didion’s The Year of Magical Thinking received its UK premiere last night (30 April, previews from 25 April 2008) at the National Theatre, where it runs in rep in the NT Lyttelton until 15 July ahead of a national and international tour. The American novelist’s first play is based on her autobiographical book of the same name about bereavement, and stars Vanessa Redgrave (pictured), who originated the role on Broadway last year.
The play tells of Didion’s struggles to come to terms with the death of John Gregory Dunne, her husband of 39 years, who died in 2003. This was followed just two years later by the death of their daughter from acute pancreatitis. The stage adaptation of The Year of Magical Thinking premiered in March 2007 at Broadway’s Booth Theatre, where it ran for five months and earned Redgrave a Best Actress nomination at last year’s Tony Awards (See News, 15 May 2007).
Described by director David Hare as “an indispensable handbook to bereavement”, the play examines the pain and disillusionment caused by the sudden loss of a loved one. As Joan’s daughter fights for her life, she clings onto the hope that by saving her, she can bring her husband back, keeping his shoes in poignant readiness. The production is designed by Bob Crowley.
The reaction of first night critics was generally strong, Redgrave in particular emerging with similar plaudits to those she received in New York. And although some found the play “oddly unaffecting” considering its difficult subject matter, most were keen to highlight the quality of the “unforgettable” acting – with Whatsonstage.com's Michael Coveney stating that its leading lady has “never been finer”.
Michael Coveney on Whatsonstage.com (four stars) – “As in New York last year, Redgrave’s performance is one of immoveable emotional power, devoid of sentimentality or cuteness, with not a shred of self-pity in the tale of a woman coping with the death of her husband and creative partner … Redgrave shines like a lighthouse, her beam steady and irradiated, her voice a steady rumble of wryly inflected reminiscence… Designer Bob Crowley’s neutral grey seascapes fall to ground with a deft musicality, while Jean Kalman’s lighting and Paul Arditti’s subtle soundtrack create a nimbus of transfiguration around the actress. For the essential truth and greatness of this performance lies in its expression of what we all know. There is life after death, not in a heaven and hell sense, but in the way we celebrate our loved ones even more intensely after they’ve gone.”
Michael Billington in the Guardian (three stars) – “Some shows are impervious to criticism. And only the stoniest heart could not respond in some measure to Joan Didion's play, based on her memoir, about the death of her husband and their daughter. But, for all the brilliance of Vanessa Redgrave's performance and the sensitivity of David Hare's production, I was less emotionally pulverised than I had expected. I put this down to the venue. Having played the 767-seat Booth Theatre in New York, Didion's work is now at the Lyttelton, which is an inhospitable space for a one-woman show. The play depends upon an intimate bond between actor and audience hard to achieve in this rigidly geometrical theatre … Redgrave brings to all this her own unique emotional transparency. She inhabits the very soul of the character, and lets you see Didion's honesty, guilt, irony, and capacity for self-examination … But, although the evening is undeniably impressive, it rarely for me became a fully shared emotional experience.”
Nicholas de Jongh in the Evening Standard (three stars) – “Nowadays we are addicted to true-life confessions, in which people describe their anguished responses to the deaths of those closest to them. So there may well be fascinated audiences for Joan Didion’s The Year of Magical Thinking. They will, though, be in for a painful surprise. For this extraordinary theatrical experience proves quite different from traditional grief-fests … Sadly the beautiful, poetic playscript, with its dramatic paragraphing, is better appreciated on the page than in David Hare’s static, listless production. The Year of Magical Thinking, which requires an intimate studio space not the Lyttelton’s vastness, makes vivid and pathetic the struggle between Didion’s desperate fantasising and her attachment to reason and order. Yet Redgrave’s dry, monotonic, emotionally withdrawn performance does not convey any such conflict. This unpredictable but often wonderful actress rises too late to luminous, wide-eyed grief and crucially fails to embody Didion’s rapt, magical thinking.”
Paul Taylor in the Independent – “A double loss at the heart of the family would hit anyone hard, but David Hare is right to suggest that Joan Didion, the celebrated American writer, was quintessentially the wrong kind of person to suffer two sudden bereavements … Dressed in a simple white shirt and grey trousers, Redgrave sits on a wooden chair with her hair pulled back in a ponytail from a face that is open and beautiful in its expressive transparency. If the goal were crude physical impersonation, Redgrave would be odd casting, given that she's as tall and imposing as Didion is diminutive and bird-like. You could argue, though, that there's an awkward mismatch between the temperamental bent of the performer and the nature of the piece … Whether over-signalling the mischievous hope aroused by this authority-hoodwinking strategy or letting out a stricken wail at its ineffectiveness, Redgrave's Didion is too easily decipherable … Bob Crowley's beautiful design consists of semi-abstract backdrops that fall to the floor as Didion sheds her illusions, but I found the play an oddly unaffecting experience.”
Benedict Nightingale in The Times (four stars) – “At times last night it seemed almost indecent to review David Hare’s production of this haunting one-woman bio, just as it did when Antony Sher performed his solo play about Primo Levi at Auschwitz. How could one critically anatomise the shadow that passed over the actor’s face when he spoke of not being alive enough to kill himself? Similarly, how can one analyse Vanessa Redgrave when her long grey face creases and her voice breaks as she recalls assuring her daughter that she’ll look after her and all will be well? True, one wouldn’t hesitate to observe and praise a suffering Hecuba; but, unlike Didion or Levi, Hecuba was fictional. Nevertheless, no actress can be more emotionally true. So Redgrave proves as a series of backcloths fall to reveal an increasingly foggy seascape and, finally, to leave her isolated against a black curtain … Myself, I’ll long remember Redgrave’s wail of ‘I need him back, I need him’ as she recalls how he cherished their girl. Joan Didion uttered it, but it’s everyone’s cry.”
- by Theo Bosanquet
** DON’T MISS our Whatsonstage.com Outing to THE YEAR OF MAGICAL THINKING on 19 May 2008 – including a FREE drink & our EXCLUSIVE Q&A with both DAVID HARE & (just confirmed) VANESSA REDGRAVE!!!! - click here for more info! **
“You sit down to dinner and life as you know it changes.” So says Joan Didion, played with a rapt and enraptured beauty by Vanessa Redgrave, in The Year of Magical Thinking, Didion’s elegant memoir described by her director, David Hare, as an indispensable handbook to bereavement.
As in New York last year, Redgrave’s performance is one of immoveable emotional power, devoid of sentimentality or cuteness, with not a shred of self-pity in the tale of a woman coping with the death of her husband and creative partner, the writer John Gregory Dunne, followed eighteen months later by the death of their daughter, Quintana, from acute pancreatitis and sceptic shock. Redgrave shines like a light-house, her beam steady and irradiated, her voice a steady rumble of wryly inflected reminiscence.
The book was published before Quintana’s death, although the history of her medical mishaps and hospitalisation is very much part of it. The play makes something more lucid, and more tragic, of Didion’s experience and narrative, and Hare’s production serves it brilliantly. Redgrave wears a simple tunic-style white blouse and oatmeal slacks. She sits on a chair. She allows her hair to tumble free of its clasp only once.
Unlike the crass scenic concrete curtain in Martin Crimp’s The City at the Royal Court, designer Bob Crowley’s neutral grey seascapes fall to ground with a deft musicality, while Jean Kalman’s lighting and Paul Arditti’s subtle soundtrack create a nimbus of transfiguration around the actress.
For the essential truth and greatness of this performance lies in its expression of what we all know. There is life after death, not in a heaven and hell sense, but in the way we celebrate our loved ones even more intensely after they’ve gone.
Didion’s partnership with Dunne thrived in a classic comfort zone of a great New York lifestyle and a house on the beach in Malibu. That style is reflected in the way she writes. Sir Gawain forecast his own death, just as Dunne did, so the couple go to Paris and stare at the stars from the pool on the roof of the Bristol Hotel. Thirty-two days later, he died.
Redgrave has never been finer than she is in this role; the quality of remembrance is as much about a loved one as it is finally about herself. And no-one who sees Redgrave will ever forget her.
If an actress has ever transcended her material, Vanessa Redgrave does it here. Throughout the one hour forty minutes of the play, my constant thought was "She deserves much better than this." Redgrave is a uniquely gifted actor whose performance makes one gasp at her memory, her stamina, her enduring beauty, her presence and her faultless delivery (in a perfectly sustained American accent), but I longed for the words she was speaking to actually move me far more than they did. Joan Didion was an unknown name to me, but I can understand why the original book was such a hit in the States: it has that no-holds-barred, let-it-all-out kind of confessional openness which seems to be a characteristic of the American psyche, but which merely causes slight embarrassment here. But, as an acting tour de force from a great lady, it is unbeatable. - sc
22 Oct 08
Saw this for the third time and finally worked out how the book was 'magicked' into her hand. Still the best....OK rds, you've got a point. - joesmith
01 Sep 08
I have to admit that my review is mostly based on seeing it from the third row in New York and being firstly mesmerised by the great Vanessa Redgrave's direct performance and even more direct blue eyes which seemed to stare directly at me, all the more embarrasing because every time I woke up she still seemed to be staring at me.
And that's the problem: if you are (a) a woman (b) have been bereaved or deserted and (c) read some Joan Didion you will probably, like 60% of the New York audience, adore this piece to the point of tears. If you have been, like the other 40% dragged along to see the most controversial and statueseque doyenne of the Great British Theatre, a national monument around whom people should be taken in boats like the Statue of Liberty, you may be less impressed ... for whilst this is a theatrical tour-de-force of memory and engagement and for an actress in her fit and vigorous seventies at that ... the material itself is stultifyingly dull.
Didion's life was rowed on a raft of total self-indulgence between her swanky apartment where the orchids matched the fabric on the love-seat in a triumph of anal retention that would out-squeeze Martha Stewart, and her beach house in Malibu. Her partner "the writer John Gregory Dunne" was all but unknown - unless you count "collaborating on the screenplay for 'A Star is Born' ", and therefore pretty much uninteresting to the wider world audiences. Didion's work itself is something of an acquired taste, being randomised and self-consciously intellectual - and there are many who would see Year of Magical Thinking more as a piece of therapy than literature.
Also throughout YOMT I got the sense that the lunatically-named daughter Quintana Roo Dunne was a mere child at the time of her illness and early demise. She was 39.
www.blowstar.blogspot.com - JohnnyFox
14 Aug 08
I have to admit that my review is mostly based on seeing it from the third row in New York and being firstly mesmerised by the great Vanessa Redgrave's direct performance and even more direct blue eyes which seemed to stare directly at me, all the more embarrasing because every time I woke up she still seemed to be staring at me.
And that's the problem: if you are (a) a woman (b) have been bereaved or deserted and (c) read some Joan Didion you will probably, like 60% of the New York audience, adore this piece to the point of tears. If you have been, like the other 40% dragged along to see the most controversial and statueseque doyenne of the Great British Theatre, a national monument around whom people should be taken in boats like the Statue of Liberty, you may be less impressed ... for whilst this is a theatrical tour-de-force of memory and engagement and for an actress in her fit and vigorous seventies at that ... the material itself is stultifyingly dull.
Didion's life was rowed on a raft of total self-indulgence between her swanky apartment where the orchids matched the fabric on the love-seat in a triumph of anal retention that would out-squeeze Martha Stewart, and her beach house in Malibu. Her partner "the writer John Gregory Dunne" was all but unknown - unless you count "collaborating on the screenplay for 'A Star is Born' ", and therefore pretty much uninteresting to the wider world audiences. Didion's work itself is something of an acquired taste, being randomised and self-consciously intellectual - and there are many who would see Year of Magical Thinking more as a piece of therapy than literature.
Also throughout YOMT I got the sense that the lunatically-named daughter Quintana Roo Dunne was a mere child at the time of her illness and early demise. She was 39.
www.blowstar.blogspot.com - JohnnyFox
14 Aug 08
Perhaps joesmith, but my money is on Penelope Wilton for greatest English speaking actress. However, I saw Ms Redgrave do this in NYC and she was ...extraordinary!
- rds
05 Aug 08
The world's greatest English speaking actress shows what she can do. Also a stunning production from David Hare, the incredibly subtle soundscape and lighting and beautiful stage pictures are unforgettable.Six stars at least! - joesmith
23 May 08
bum, I've pressed the wrong button again -- meant to give it five stars. - LDE
20 May 08
We saw this last Friday, and were also lucky enough to be part of the WOS outing on Monday. It's hard to imagine that this taxing part could be played better by anyone; Vanessa Redgrave's performance was a veritable tour de force. Quite apart from the sheer physical and mental demands of learning what is effectively a one-and-a-half hour monologue, how does one person keep up the intensity without losing the attention of the audience? Well I don't know how she did it, but she did, and I for one am grateful. The opening words,"it will happen to you. The details will be different, but it will happen to you. That's what I'm here to tell you" to me sum up the play. What we are 'treated' to is a narrative of one woman's experience of bereavement. While we can console ourselves with the thought that, we hope, not many of us will have to live through the death of a child, we are all going to suffer bereavement, and we are all going to have to cope with it. Didion offers no platitudes, no 'comfort'. She just tells it like it is, narrating how 'magical thinking' ('what if?') guided her through the first year and enabled her to cope. Her emotional journey from 'cool customer' to grieving widow and mother dealing with the death of her only child is beautifully, and unsentimentally, depicted by Redgrave. The direction is minimalist, and the majority of the 'action' takes place in a wooden chair, the only furniture on the stage. This had the effect of focusing the attention entirely on the words, ditto the backdrops. It was in the quiet, still moments that my attention was most gripped; only a performer of Redgrave's calibre has the skill and confidence to play the silences as forcefully as she does the text. A wonderful evening, full marks to Redgrave and director David Hare. I'm glad I've seen it twice; I suspect a third visit is looming, as soon as the extended dates are announced. - LDE
20 May 08
The National suffers from it's audience being mostly from a certain older age group - and one it's fighting to change - that audience was spoken to directly by this play/subject and had us all in total awe. What we witnessed last night from Vanessa Redgrave is a reminder just how GREAT she is - yes the "play" is okay - but the delivery and inclusion with her audience is total. I've never experienced such sustained applause from a straight play audience - no cheers - just prolonged standing appreciatation of her greatness, and anyone wanting to see just how great should get in there - NOW! - Cliff Grundy
08 May 08
I agree that the performance is better than the play. Redgrave shows yet again what a great actress she is and what we have lost in not seeing her more often on the stage. But the play (although obviously heartfelt) seems curiously unmoving. - fred
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.