Synopsis Concerns Martin Luther, whose personal struggle with God led, inevitably, to a battle with the Church that set in motion the Protestant Reformation. This private and public epic unfolds through a series of portraits of 16th-century Europe, showing the Catholic Church in all its wisdom, corruption and glory failing to embrace one of its most astonishing sons.
Dates: Opens 05 October 2001. Sep 29,Oct1,2,3,4,6m,6,17,18m,18,19,20m,20,22,23m,23,30,31,Nov 1m,1,7,8,9,10m,10,12,13,14m,14 Eve 19:15, Mats 14:00 Oct 5 at 19:00
It takes some nerve on director Peter Gill's part to place his leading man (Rufus Sewell) with his back to the audience for the opening five minutes. Only Sewell's tonsured wig is visible initially, but he grows forcefully into the part of 16th century radical Martin Luther.
John Osborne's 1961 drama is a marathon three-hour piece, and only the National's resources could have assembled a cast of this quality to do it justice. Alison Chitty's marbled, monastic sets echo with ascetism, whilst live music and deeply resonant ensemble singing lend the evening a meditative temper.
The thrust of Luther's stance decreed that faith could endure irrespective of religious orthodoxy, and that peddling guilt for profit corrupted the churches themselves. Such an attitude would doubtless have found favour with the anarchic Osborne, but by and large he leaves the script free of unrestrained angst.
Sewell lives and breathes the role for every second. Whether scrubbing floors with a zealous vigour, or in the grip of palsied torment, his performance keeps you riveted. Geoffrey Hutchings as the gruff, disappointed father leads the comic exchanges with a flourish. 'Too much wine? I could drink this monk's piss from here to Gabriel Hall!' he storms indignantly.
Equally striking is Richard Griffiths' role as the tainted Johann Tetzel. Explaining the church's sale of bonds to the living or dead to spare their damnation, he engages the audience like a stand-up genius. Almost pantomime in its gross campfoolery, it's a turn that won an ovation of its own, with Griffiths clearly enjoying himself hugely.
But it's the growth of Luther from convulsed striver to self-justified opposer that we're there to concentrate on. 'You always talk as if lightning were about to strike behind you,' he is advised. A soul in torment, seeking release, it isn't until he replaces monastic monotony with college contemplation that his mind begins to soar. A sagacious Timothy West becomes his confidant and adviser, although Luther's obsessions with ailments of the body and spirit prevail throughout.
Wisdom is fashioned into Osborne's script like ripples in the Christ carving that's hung aloft. The playwright loved a good rant, and the pulpit scenes end with the front rows taking cover from a hail of frothy phlegm. But the anger is well-directed, against notions of state and church control, whilst introducing enough doubts to balance the issue against Luther.
Sewell is awesome throughout. How does his voice stand up to it, you ask yourself? 'To go against one's conscience is neither safe nor honest,' pleads Luther, with Osborne's wrathful face swimming into view. If only some ire could have been spent on the audience, whose endless coughs and sneezes spread diseases all night long. A plague upon their houses - if there isn't one already.
Mystic, hypochondriac and doubter. Osborne and Sewell present us with all these options, whilst preserving the man who offered wholesome original blessing over wholly original sin.
Gareth Thompson's Review made very good reading but he clearly attended a different night. The audience was utterly silent most of the time, no coughs no noise, no standing ovation, nothing. Rufus Sewell's voice had well and truly gone and he might be advised to go and see Sher in Mahler's conversion. The music, singing and production were faultless, shame about the play. Timothy West alone, however, is worth a visit to this marathon play. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
14 Nov 01
Probably a little late to add a review as this is about to close, but I reckon it is a flawed played, well produced and well acted. Indeed there were moments when I felt that it was over and under written at the same time. Great long monologues about internal thought and no movement of drama along the sequence of events in Luther's life. There was serious drama interrupted by a pantomime scene when Richard Griffiths (Tetzel) sells indulgences in the market square and invites the audience to buy. Although I feel that Sewell voice was suffering the night I saw it, I felt that he and others gave fabulous performances. The problems I felt were in the writing rather than the production, which begs the question, why did the National stage it? - USER: Whatsonstage.com
13 Nov 01
Sewell's vocal equipment is not his strongest tool as an actor, which is about the only caveat that can be made against this production, where so much depends on intellectual argument. The rest of the cast ranges from fine to brilliant. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
12 Oct 01
Psychological portrait of why Luther became Luther. Does not feel very deep. Several scenes not enhancing the psychological understanding. Play is over three hours and moves along very slowly. As always the staging is very good. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.