Synopsis This evocative and glittering musical, set in the 1920's, follows the story of an outrageously glamorous and fashionable couple - The Scott Fitzgeralds. He's a successful young author and she's the stylish young wife who, together, become the envy of all with their high spending and high-flying lifestyle. They created their own world of enchantment. Scott christened the period The Jazz Age, and Zelda lived it. Yet the darker tale that lay behind the dazzling facade just begged to be told. British singer/songwriter Roger Cook (I d Like To Teach The World To Sing/Talking In Your Sleep) felt this was definitely the case and linking up with an old friend and fellow songwriter, Les Reed (It's Not Unusual/Delilah), along with bookwriter Kit Hesketh Harvey (The Vicar Of Dibley) they set about creating a musical out of the fabled couple who epitomised the triumph and the tragedy of the decade. Beautiful and Damned is a spectacular 'all new' musical, based on the tragic story of Zelda and F. Scott Fitzgerald, opening in London's West End in April 2004 following its critically acclaimed debut at Guilford's Yvonne Arnaud Theatre in 2003.
It's difficult to resist calling Beautiful and Damned more damned than beautiful, but then this is a musical that never meets a cliché it doesn't like and rushes headlong to embrace, so I'm in good company. And as much as I would like to be able to welcome a new, British-originated musical on Shaftesbury Avenue that features an original score instead of recycling a pop jukebox, it's stretching it a bit to call the soupy, pastiche songs of Les Reed and Roger Cook original.
It's odd that a musical largely set in the 'Jazz Age' of the 20s that its leading characters didn't just epitomize but also christened as such should boast a score that sounds like it's come from the muzak age. Reed and Cook are variously responsible for such easy-listening standards as “It's Not Unusual”, “There's a Kind of Hush”, “Delilah” and “I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing”, so they might be able to tease out the occasional insinuating melody, but none of their work here is sufficient to anchor, let alone drive, a plot-led drama.
But the show becomes even more unstuck in it's overloaded telling. As it hitches a ride on the troubled relationship of the great American novelist F Scott Fitzgerald (Michael Praed) and his wife Zelda (Helen Anker), Kit Hesketh Harvey's book attempts to compress a complex tale into two-and-a-half hours of stage traffic. But there's so much to tell that it's like rush hour up there, and the result is by turns sentimental, arch, earnest and even tasteless.
Musicals can usefully use songs to telescope emotion, but no sooner have Scott and Zelda met than they're in love, all in the space of a single song, before Harvey's book propels them towards conflict (her reluctant parents), resolution (his rising career and their marriage), and on to yet more conflict (their respective affairs, his drinking, her thwarted artistic ambitions etc).
It's enough to drive a person crazy, and indeed, Zelda did end her days in a mental asylum. Oddly, Harvey's book has the show begin where it ends with Zelda in that asylum, which is either expecting the audience to know their story coming in - in which case, why tell it? - or else to confuse them entirely if they don't.
But then Craig Revel Horwood's production, too, is prone to big gestures - and bigger production numbers - than sense and sensitivity. With choreography that is more frenetic than fabulous, it seeks to make a splash (literally so in an Act One finale that contains a gushing water fountain), but when a character claims: "The trouble with the depression is that it's so depressing,", it also nails the trouble with this musical.
Seen this show twice and whilst it was always going to be 'damned' it emerges with far more credibity than expected and makes for a far more enjoyable evening than the critics would lead you to believe possible! and a very strong ensemble and commitment from the cast - and no I'm in may connected to this show, I just went along prepared to entertained and surprised! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.6.181.61)
09 Aug 04
Seen this show twice and whilst it was always going to be 'damned' it emerges with far more credibity than expected and makes for a far more enjoyable evening th - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.6.181.61)
09 Aug 04
Interesting and entertaining, but with something major gone wrong somewhere. But good to see as someone who enjoys theatre. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.67.76)
03 Aug 04
From Mrs San Pietro, Vancouver BC, Canada
We liked this. Beautiful costumes and set and a very good performance from Helen Anker, a terrific dancer. A brave new musical. Liked it. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.137.34.25)
03 Aug 04
Loved it! Don't miss it. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.168.169)
08 Jul 04
For a story that is set in the jazz age, the jazz was sadly lacking. The songs were cheesy and with truely embarrassing lyrics. I would cringe when the lights dimmed and another character stepped into the spotlight for a pointless solo. The dance numbers tried to make up for poor material with over-the-top choreography, but were just in pure bad taste at some points (the cocaine chopping scene!?!). Helen Ankar is an upcoming talent, wonderful dancing and a charismatic persona. After sitting through the first act, my partner and I gritted out teeth (it was raining outside) and sat through the second, where things did improve marginally. Having said this, I must have seen this show on tourist night, since the entire American tour group who seemed to constitute the rest of the audience seemed to love it. I came away wondering what F.Scott Fitzgerald and Zelda herself, unconventional and rebelious individuals of their time, would have made of this trite and dismal rendition of their lives. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.43.92.149)
08 Jul 04
I saw this last night, wondering how it would be after seeing the fairly dismal previews in Guildford last year. However, the rewriting has made all the difference and even with the tube strike, there was a very good house. The performances were vibrant, particularly from Helen Anker, the set, lighting, costumes and dancing were great. The music was pleasant and tuneful, if not memorable, and the audience cheered at the end. A thoroughly good evening. It is such a pity this show is closing. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.48.17.154)
30 Jun 04
I was one of the 'sheep', initially put off seeing the show by the dreadful review in the Express. However, when I heard that the critic in question had given a fantastic review for a new show he hadn't even seen! (Barbara Cook's Broadway) I decided to go and see 'Beautiful and Damned' and make up my own mind. I am so glad I did! I think the show is wonderful, the actors are superb and the music is fantastic! I have read that people think the songs are not memorable but, having now seen the show again, I have at least four of the beautiful melodies buzzing around my head! I think we are so used to seeing remakes, where we know the songs, it's very refreshing to have a new score. I heartily agree with John Sullivan's fantastic review of "Beautiful and Damned" (he is the creator of "Only Fools and Horses"). The audience I saw on both occasions LOVED the show! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.168.165)
22 Jun 04
I brought a group of theatre afficienados from the States for a behind-the-scenes theatre tour, during which they saw 9 West End shows of their choice. Everyone in the group who chose to see "Beautiful and the Damned," without exception, loved it. They were all affected by the very sad story of a woman who was horribly, mentally abused by her father and husband. We could find fault with the sets and perhaps some of the voices (though some were excellent), but it is a rarity to see a strong story and strong performances in a musical. It is certainly not a feel-good musical, but it's a musical we will remember far longer than others with finger snapping music and a fluffy book. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (68.174.149.235)
18 Jun 04
BEAUTIFUL & KAK!! What a bloody awful show! Instantly forgettable songs, wooden acting, poor sound quality, people actually pay £45 to see this rubbish? £20 was bad enough on a special offer! For goodness sake, close this show and let the embarrassed cast move on to better things. All 3 of us left during the interval. Definitely one to avoid! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.67.66)
Opened 17 Dec 1888. 959 seats. [Bought from Andrew Lloyd Webber and now owned by Broadway producer Max Weitzenhoffer and Nica Burns. Society of London Theatre member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.