The Royal Family could never be accused of gimmicky star casting in the sense of employing Hollywood hitters, soap characters or pop singers, but nonetheless, by British theatregoing standards, casting doesn't get much starrier than this. Peter Bowles, Harriet Walter, Julia McKenzie, Toby Stephens and, of course, Dame Judi Dench - ooh la la.
This esteemed assemblage plays a clan of renowned New York stage actors (based on the Barrymore American acting dynasty) during the theatre heyday of the 1920s. Dench is matriarch Fanny Cavendish, an old trouper combatting an unnamed illness with dreams of a dramatic comeback. Her offspring are Stephens' Anthony, fleeing disillusioned from the silent screens of a fledgling Hollywood, and Walter's Julie, the box office belle of Broadway. Bowles is Dench's brother Herbert Dean and McKenzie his wife Kitty, both also actors, making valiant and amusing efforts to present themselves as younger and more talented than they are.
Added to this bunch are granddaughter Gwen (played breezily by newcomer Emily Blunt), producer-manager Oscar Wolfe (a stoic but wily Philip Voss), and non-acting love interests Perry and Gilbert (Robert Petkoff and Peter Blythe respectively).
Taken altogether then, there's no shortage of promise in this revival of Edna Ferber and George S Kaufman's 1927 comedy. And yet, somehow, it doesn't quite work. Director Peter Hall manages to whip up a sense of busyness with ringing phones, noisy doors, scurrying servants, pounding up and down stairs and lots of everyone talking at once, each character egotistically vying to be the centre of attention. But this general hubbub can't disguise the fact that not enough of consequence happens up on the Theatre Royal stage (kitted out with Anthony Ward's wonderful art deco, curving staircase-framed apartment set).
The production's to-die-for casting also presents a bit of a problem. A few fleeting chances aside, the parts and the play simply aren't big or meaty enough for such talent. Stephens makes the most impact, gambolling about with sword and cigarette holder, like an overblown Errol Flynn, and Walter is a sympathetic Julie, more family rock than prima donna. And then there's Dame Judi, presiding over all with grandeur and some oh-so-haughtily deadpan put-downs. Dench also delivers the most stirring moment of the scene - describing with awed reverence the feeling of pre-curtain up excitement - but it's too brief and not insightful enough.
It also falls to Dench to utter, with no little irony, the funniest line of the night - "May god strike me dead if I ever appear in an all-star revival", proclaims her Fanny. Things on this occasion may not call for such drastic measures, but there's no denying this real-life all-star revival falls far short of expectations.
I must admit that I was driven to see The Royal Family simply by the fact that the marvellous Dame Judi Dench headed the cast and I was not dissapointed in that respect, Dame Judi was magnificnet, her sarcastic put-downs never failed to cause laughter and the part when she describes pre-performance nerves is rather touching and gives a glimer of insight into a character which is unfortunately, like all the others, rather 2dimensional in structure. The supurb cast do their best with what they have but what they have in the form of script, plot and storyline is remarkably flimsy. I did leave questioning why such top class performers agreed to star in such a tired empty story, however Judi Dench's performance does make up for it, just about. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
19 Dec 01
I have to admit that it was the cast that tempted me into seeing this show rather than the plot or reviews.
Overall I quite enjoyed it. Act I was a bit slow but Acts II and III were much better and at times it was gloriously over the top and had a very touching ending.
Judi Dench was good especially in the scene where she pretended to faint to stop her grand daughter giving up acting. She also had some great one liners. Harriet Walter was superb as the belle of broadway who tried to bring a bit of calmness to the family. Peter Bowles was very funny times. Unfortunately Julia McKenzie was sinfully underused and I am surprised she took such a small part. The evening was made worthwhile by Toby Stephens as the Hollywood star - he was a joy to watch and lit up the stage every time he appeared as a sort of Errol Flynn kind of character.
I doubt the show would have lasted, or even opened, without such a star cast and the whole piece is very much character driven rather than plot driven and such a fine array of talent made the whole thing worthwhile. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
10 Dec 01
The problem is the creaky, old play in which not much happens. In Act I everyone screams a lot, but there's very little plot development. Things didn't get going until Act II, which was much better. Loved the cast, especially Peter Bowles, Toby Stephens
and Harriet Walker. I'm an ardent Dame
Judi fan but have seen her so much better in other performances. Another
favourite, Julia McKenzie, really didn't have much to do. Would have loved this cast in another play about a real royal family called Crown Matrimonial, which I saw at the same theatre back in the 70's. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
04 Dec 01
Yes, I have to admit that the some American accents leave a lot to be desired but I cannot see how you could see this play and not be blown over by Dame Judi's stage presence; I have never been so drawn to an actress on stage. I can understand how the play could have gone (it needed the cast and director) but to say that it was a huge disappointment is beyond my sixteen year-old brain to comprehend. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
12 Nov 01
This is a very nice play with great acting!! Peter Bowles was brilliantly funny, Toby Stephens great. Judi Dench needed a bit of time to get going, but ones she did she was really good. The great set and costumes also made this a wonderful experiance. Only thing they could have done without is the American accent. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
12 Nov 01
For many years now, Judi Dench has been a national institution rather than an actress. It doesn't seem to matter whether or not the role suits her - the magic of her name puts bums on seats and ensures largely uncritical reviews. I haven't seen "The Royal Family" but I sympathise with those who have and were dissapointed; many years ago I saw Dame Judi as Mother Courage and thought she was hopelessly miscast (I can't remember anything about her performance, but I've never forgotten that of Zoe Wanamaker as her daughter Katrin). - USER: Whatsonstage.com
08 Nov 01
seldom have I agreed with theatre critics but have to this time - acting superb, costumes and set brilliant but what on earth was the director thinking to have this band of English actors slipping in and out of an annoying American/mid atlantic accent. I enjoyed the vening for the effort put in by the actors, not the play itself. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
05 Nov 01
I had one of the best theathrical experiences I've had for a long time!(An aesthetic comment, however!) Why did Toby Stevens (Anthony) wear black briefs under white trousers? Anyway, briefs in the 1920's would represent an anachronysm,
- USER: Whatsonstage.com
04 Nov 01
A total disappointment and waste of a top class cast. The problem mostly rests with the play which is creaky to say the least. That doesn't mean that plays of this era and ilk are bound to fail. I could imagine plays like "The Man Who Came to Dinner" or "You can't take it with you" still being hugely funny but this one, despite the great cast, is just a big yawn. I think Peter Hall deserves all the blame. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
04 Nov 01
One of the most disappointing evenings I've ever spent in the theatre. Nice to look at, but not carefully directed and the actors did not convey a sense of joy in doing the show. In the end, I felt this was a cynical, "let's make some money" move on the part of many of the people involved. Such a staggering waste of talent! - USER: Whatsonstage.com
Opened 29 Dec 1720. Closed in 1737 (partly for attacking the government), re-opened 1747. The current theatre opened on 4th July 1821 and was designed by Nash. The last theatre in London to use candles (1837). 888 seats. Society of London Theatre member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.