Synopsis You can sit there with your knit knit knitting but some of us have places to go, some of us are still ready to strip the light fandango before we shuffle off, so don't tell me what to do. There are just too many old people. As a government research body seeks to deal with the problems of a maturing population, a family addresses its own. Lyn’s memory starts to go, Alice takes a fall and even Robbie has to face the signs of ageing. Relations are put to the test across three generations. As are those who enter the increasingly sinister world of State Care. I don’t see how you can legislate for all old people this way. What’s the cut off?Tamsin Oglesby’s furious comedy confronts head-on our embarrassment and fear about old age. It exposes a society in which compassion vies with pragmatism and, by asking unequivocal questions, it comes up with some extraordinary answers. Oh they’d have a choice, yes. If they choose quality of life over cure. Quality of life has always been an option.
Timing is not always everything, but Tamsin Oglesby’s sharp as a tack new play could have been prescribed specifically to accompany Terry Pratchett’s headline-hogging plea for dignity in death by assisted suicide.
But instead of suggesting that old age alone is the cause of amnesia or Alzheimer’s, her play more interestingly broadens the scope of the argument to encompass the whole human condition.
Nobody’s perfect. Vacancy is as much a state of mind in the young as the old, and policy wonks are just as susceptible to tricks of perception as the batty old dear who thinks the hospital’s a hotel and that sex is like pantomime – “silly and rude, but at least it’s only once a year.”
Oglesby’s smart plays usually stem from one big idea: the vicissitudes of the beauty business, or the after effects of school bullying or, most recently, in The War Next Door, domestic violence as a paradigm of cultural conflict.
Here, the slippage of two old sisters - Judy Parfitt’s grizzled and combative Lyn and Marcia Warren’s younger and deliciously off-centre Alice - into the health system triggers a comedy of caring that revolves around the slightly obtuse idea that an elderly turtle in the Natural History Museum represents the perennial life force manifest in a new baby’s arrival.
The writing is funny and clever, the acting in Anna Mackmin’s production uniformly superb, but the dramatic texture’s a bit thin, and the play comes across as burningly topical but somehow too diagrammatic.
The old dears have an even older brother, Robbie, whom Gawn Grainger presents as a cantankerous old sod, head-butting fellow customers in the bar of the National Theatre (you know the type) and changing his girlfriends with the regularity of his increasingly youthful wardrobe.
And Paul Ritter’s manic policy official, Monroe, leads a research team (Paul Bazely and Tanya Franks) glued to their charts and computer screens devising pavement strategies and euthanasia directives as the population becomes top heavy with the over-sixties.
Lyn’s daughter (Amelia Bullmore) and Alice’s grandson (Thomas Jordan) are no less peculiar than the oldsters, while Michela Meazza’s robotic nurse proves that curing and caring is often more bizarre than natural disintegration.
As someone who is really old, like 51 and feeling every day of it at the moment, Tamsin Oglesby's play is a look at a potentially grim future. Given the average age of a NT matinee audience I dread to think what they made of it. The play is a clever satire which just about manages not to fall into the trap of stretching the bounds of plausibility too far and it's also very funny in places - the comparison of sex to pantomime is brilliant. In an excellent cast it's a neat trick to cast Judy Parfitt as the sister with Alzheimer's and the wonderfully dotty Marcia Warren as the (marginally) more clued up sister; she also gets most of the funniest lines. Occasionally the moralising is far from subtle but this is a rewarding contribution to the highly topical debate on caring for the elderly and having the right to die with dignity. As just one example, Joanna Lumley has proposed an army of adoptive grandparents - just as in the play - and the idea of separate speed lanes foe pedestrians is brilliant, but then again I'm about as impatient as Gawn Grainger's cantankerous Robbie. I'm surprised at how many negative reviews this has received, I found it mostly enjoyable and quite provocative. - David Baxter
20 Apr 10
The biggest problem about this play is that it doesn't sell itself honestly. If you go expecting a great night's entertainment and don't expect anything blindingly avant garde or full of poignant politics you certainly won't be disappointed. The acting is superb, the story unfolds cleverly and unexpectedly and it is great entertainment. Superb value - we loved it and so did the rest of the audience last Saturday when we went. - Mrs H
23 Feb 10
Well, not as high as 3 but not as low as 2 really! New plays have become a rarity at the National, so it's disappointing to report that their choice has again be found lacking. The play is set in the future when the old who have no family to care for them have to choose between becoming grandparents for teenage orphans or the subject of clinical and surgical trials. It's a satire / a black comedy / a tragicomedy which I'm afraid doesn't really work. It's a very good idea and a very topical subject. I'm not entirely sure why it doesn't work, but I think it's because it isn't enough of anything - enough of a satire to bite or enough of a black comedy to make you wince and laugh simultaneously. The main reason to see the show is a terrific performance by New Adventures dancer Michela Meazza as a robot nurse which is technically impeccable and an absolute hoot. There was a time when plays like Jerusalem and Enron were staged at the National; what's happened? - Gareth James
17 Feb 10
brilliant, vivid and sensitive juggling of the complex issues that surround dementia, executed through great innovative and imaginative writing and stagecraft, but consequently challenging for an audience to get to grips with if they are not able to cope with such difficult themes or approaches. people will love it or hate it! - gerald
10 Feb 10
Paul Ritter is fantastic as always and indeed the whole cast are good and the production and design etc are all pretty good but I thought the play was trivial, facile, unfocussed and uneven. And smug- are jokes about characters being at the National (while performing in a play at the National, do you see?!) really THAT clever or funny? - Benet Catty
06 Feb 10
poor play. not funny, and doesn't make sense. some interesting ideas and moments, but feels like a very early draft. - natalia
05 Feb 10
Simply dreadful - went with friends, one of whom would rather remove his nose hairs with a burning candle than leave a play at the interval - needless to say neither he nor I lasted 'til the second half. - James C
05 Feb 10
Play all over the shop, BUT you can't fault the talent of Michela Meazza as the robot! A stunning performance in a play that doesn't quite know what to focus on. - Steven Davidson
04 Feb 10
quite the worst play that i have seen at the National, Nation, only being a fraction better! Badly written and directed, but very well acted. A confusing production, it did not seem to know where it was going and consequently resulted in a mess. a very luke warm response the night i saw it. - tom berg
04 Feb 10
Judy Parfitt and Marcia Warren are the best things in this confused play that is nowhere 'savagely comic' as it claims to be. - addicted to theatre
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.