Synopsis Poor Tom Kerwood. All he wants to do is adopt a baby. So how does he end up with two illegal immigrants and a dead body? Blame his two brothers, Dick and Harry whose idea for helping Tom end up with Tom's marriage on the rocks, a death threat from the Russian mafia, a visit from the local police plus a first wife he never had - then it starts to get complicated!
The death of farce is frequently pronounced. But if the genre is dead, nobody told Ray Cooney - or, in any case, he obstinately refused to believe it. During his 50-odd year career, Cooney has churned out hits such as Funny Money, Wife Begins at Forty, Out of Order and, of course, 1983’s oft-produced Run for Your Wife as well as its sequel Caught in the Net. Now Cooney is back in the West End for the 23rd time (though the first time since Caught in the Net in 2001) with his latest, Tom, Dick and Harry, which he’s co-written with his Los Angeles-based screenwriter son Michael.
The play has had a somewhat troubled production history. Originally seen in Windsor in 2003 with a cast that included Bradley Walsh and Joe Pasquale, its expected transfer announcement didn’t materialise until last autumn. Its planned March 2005 opening was then kyboshed by Pasquale’s success on reality television’s I’m a Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here; the King of the Jungle apparently deciding there were better ways to capitalise on his newly elevated status.
At Tom Kerwood’s home in south London, he and his wife Linda are nervously preparing for a visit from the adoption agency official who can greenlight their application. With less than an hour to go before she arrives, though, Tom’s layabout brothers, Dick and Harry, prove far more adept at hindering than helping. Dick has brought back 400,000 cigarettes, several crates of brandy and two illegal immigrants from Calais, while Harry has an even more unsavoury delivery from the hospital morgue where he works as an assistant.
And that’s just for starters. As with all good farces, the plot thickens to tar-like consistency with dollops of lies and counter-lies as the protagonist battles to maintain order and hide mounting secrets and complications. In this instance, a Russian mafioso, a first wife named Adriatica, a dead mother-in-law, a bard-inspired TV programme, a wheelbarrow and an easily duped policeman also figure – not to mention the requisite five, frequently slammed doors leading off Douglas Heap’s spacious front room set.
Though a few groan-worthy jokes could be happily buried with the body parts, Cooney’s construction remains faultless, the many disparate strands cleverly tangled and then untangled within two hours. The main problems are not so much with the play as with the production.
The McGann brothers - Joe, Stephen and Mark – as the trio of the title are all likeable enough (and you can hardly question their fraternity!), but you can’t help but feel that their parts were crafted with others in mind. Certainly so with Mark, perhaps the most gifted comically, whose bumbling Harry seems to have swallowed Joe Pasquale’s squeaky voicebox. At this stage, the McGanns also don’t seem particularly at ease with the fast-paced demands of farce – as a result, too many potential belly-laugh moments elicit only chuckles or wry smiles due to lack of speed. This may well improve as the run settles.
Fast or slow, yes, it all feels dated and old-fashioned. And, for those who don’t like farces on principle, Tom, Dick and Harry is not the one to change their minds. For those who do, there’s plenty here to amuse, including some very funny set pieces, though the production itself rarely reaches the heights – or depths – of helpless abandon you may like it to.
Top marks to the cast of this play for their sterling efforts to disguise it as anything other than mediocre. I desperately wanted to believe in Tom, Dick and Harry's characters (and the rest of them) but alas the stilted dialogue and out-of-this planet plot (less escapism than ridiculous) rendered that impossible. The calibre of the actors involved convinced me to see this play despite having read some of the most damning reviews ever, but I was depressingly disappointed. How apt that such convoluted plot lines could neatly conclude with a lazy coincidence that saved the day. I only hope the exposure will help the valiantly performing McGanns to other, much better scripts in the future. - 217.33.209.253)
20 Sep 05
If you want serious theatre then don't go to see this show. However, if you want farce, fun, puns, slapstick, some frenetic dialogue, laughter and genuine, old-fashined, entertainment then this is the one for you. I saw it at the matinee on 20 August. It was well rehearsed, the dialogue and movements were slick and they really seemed to enjoy themselves as much as the audience did. If you visit the theatre for entertainment that lifts and cheers then this is a play for you. - 80.88.213.146)
01 Sep 05
I went on 27/8 and really enjoyed the show. I thought the McGanns were excellent, particularly Joe. The whole cast were very good. The audience responded well, with enthusiastic applause at the end (so it wasn't just me). - 195.93.21.102)
29 Aug 05
We saw this at last Saturdays's preview and we thoroughly enjoyed it. - 213.122.133.221)
26 Aug 05
Found it very contrived, very tedious and totally unfunny. Comedy as Cooney once knew it no longer has a place in the West End and sadly the rows of empty seats during previews will sadly grow now the reviews are out - avoid. - 62.6.181.62)
25 Aug 05
This is the first "traditional British farce" I've seen (I don't count masterpieces like Noises Off & What The Butler Saw as they deliberately subvert the genre) and it will certainly be the last. I found this corny, offensive, desperately unfunny and wretchedly acted. Most of the people around me just sat gazing at the stage vacantly rather than laughing, Can't say I blamed them. Hated it. - 195.82.123.181)
24 Aug 05
Press night (23/8) performance was poor. One got the feeling they still needed a week's rehearsal to properly grade the action; the fever pitch acting by "Tom" from the start of the first act allowed very little room for any crescendo. His wife (Louise Jameson)appeared uncomfortable on stage and similarly shouted her way throughout the whole play.
Mrs Potter was unconvincing as an adoption-agency matron, with too many "false start" movements.
Although a farce, which did thankfully pick up a bit in the send act, the script contained a number of incredibly corny lines more appropriate in a family pantomime.
The male illegal alien puts on a good show as a drunk but is let down by his grandaughter who appears too worldly by half and is too made up considering she spent three days travelling rough. Her costume is also rather overdone (romanian milk maid).
The brothers, "Bradford and Bingley" (another panto prop) tend to over-act. Their franetic movements on stage make it appear too small.
A shame detail like the weight of the bin bag was not corrected; unconvincingly "heavy". Also set too brightly lit.
Overall mildly entertaining. - 80.250.130.141)
Opened 10 Sep 1892 as the Trafalgar Square Theatre,name changed in 1895. Major refurbishment 79/80. Taken over by the Royal Court during their two year refurbishment starting in 1996, called the Royal Court downstairs. 650 seats. Society of London Theatre member. An [ATG] member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.