Synopsis Mr Voysey is a wealthy, successful solicitor. When his son and heir Edward makes a shocking discovery, he confronts his father who tries to convince Edward to 'be a man' about the situation. This family saga is a stinging attack on Edwardian bourgeois society and the moral duplicity that lay behind the accumulation of its wealth. Running time 2 hours 55 mins (20 minute interval)
Peter Gill’s revival of Harley Granville Barker’s 1903 English classic The Voysey Inheritance opened at the National Theatre’s Lyttelton Theatre last night (Tuesday 25 April 2006).
Dominic West (pictured) and Julian Glover star in the play in which Edward’s highly principled world turns upside down when his father reveals that he’s been illegally speculating with clients’ money. The cast also features Nancy Carroll, John Nettleton, Andrew Wooddall and Lucy Briers. The production continues in the NT Lyttelton repertoire until 7 June 2006.
Critics agreed the darkly comic satire of Edwardian life has received a well-timed revival, and enjoyed Gill’s production which, in the main, they found livelier than the last time the play was at the National, in a production directed by former artistic director Richard Eyre in the NT Cottesloe in 1989.
** DON’T MISS our Whatsonstage.com Outing to The Voysey Inheritance - including a FREE drink at our exclusive post-show reception with the cast! – on Wednesday 31 May 2006 - click here for more details! **
Michael Coveney on Whatsonstage.com - “The greatness of the play lies in the way Granville Barker takes his theme into the tainted real lives of the beneficiaries - Edward’s brothers, his mother (a smiling bird-like creature in Doreen Mantle’s portrait of someone who knew about it all along and played “deaf”) and spinsterish sister (Lucy Briers)…. The stage is full of riveting performances”. He concluded: “One hundred years after its premiere at the Court, Granville Barker’s classic remains a play for today with high style and true vengeance.”
Rhoda Koenig in the Independent - “Peter Gill's splendidly crisp and well-cast production - far livelier than the 1989 Richard Eyre production in the Cottesloe - gets tremendous fun, both subtle and broad, out of the various Voyseys and their responses to the news that ‘pater’ kept them all happy through embezzlement. Andrew Woodall, as Edward's older brother Booth, is a hilarious model of empty pomposity…” However, she was disappointed with “Julian Glover as Voysey, who bellows his entire part, ignoring the juice to be squeezed out of its emotional blackmail and sexual rivalry.” And, according to Koenig, “the play as a whole is too long and leisurely, and the last scene undramatic”.
Michael Billington in the Guardian - “Gill's excellent production proves that the play is more than a topical assault on financial fraud: it is also a comprehensive attack on Edwardian England.” He believes the production “reminds us of the subversiveness of Granville Barker's well-upholstered play and the acting has the in-depth quality of the National at its best”. Contrary to Koenig, he declared Julian Glover “excellent” and said the overall effect was “in short, a first-rate evening”.
Benedict Nightingale in The Times - “Peter Gill’s superficially lavish, emotionally lucid revival at the National convinces me that Barker wrote nothing finer than The Voysey Inheritance… The play is often funny… an exposé of hypocrisy, pretence and the Maxwell-like display people mistake for financial solidity… But Barker goes far further, using characters to ask radical questions about the correlation of need and possession, the sources of wealth, the happiness money can and can’t bring, the subtle corruptions it causes. Gill cuts some of this, which is a pity but does mean that the play never gets too preachy.”
** DON’T MISS our Whatsonstage.com Outing to The Voysey Inheritance - including a FREE drink at our exclusive post-show reception with the cast! – on Wednesday 31 May 2006 - click here for more details! **
Last seen in Richard Eyre’s 1989 intimate “traverse” staging in the NT Cottesloe, Harley Granville Barker’s magnificent drama can be seen as a founding document of both the National and the Royal Court.
Peter Gill’s production in the NT Lyttelton has a Victorian sweep – there is indeed a street-cleaner on the margins – and a cunning attention to detail (and some annoying newsreel and musical snippets on tape between acts), as the Voysey family is exposed as living on the back of deep-seated fraud and corruption.
Edward (Dominic West) has discovered that his solicitor father (Julian Glover) has been systematically disposing of his clients’ bonds and trust funds in his own account. An opening clash of moral outrage and stubborn justification sets out the challenge: will Edward expose the fraud and declare the family bankrupt?
Switching between the office in Lincoln’s Inn and the family seat in Chislehurst – the handsome designs and costumes are by Alison Chitty – the drama unravels through Edward’s process of deliberation. The harder decision would be to maintain a reputation for honesty while manipulating the funds until all debts are paid.
One commentator has pointed out that the worm in the Voysey bud is “first cousin” to the worm in Enron’s. A sustained conspiracy to defraud clients and investors is both a mark of big business and of such recent operators as Robert Maxwell with his pension funds and Nick Leeson with his audacious rip-offs at Barings Bank.
The greatness of the play lies in the way Granville Barker takes this theme into the tainted real lives of the beneficiaries – Edward’s brothers, his mother (a smiling bird-like creature in Doreen Mantle’s portrait of someone who knew about it all along and played “deaf”) and spinsterish sister (Lucy Briers). And we hit pay dirt when a close family friend, played with spaniel-like devotion by John Nettleton, withdraws his securities and is ruined.
From Julian Glover’s imposing, non-apologetic family titan to Nancy Carroll’s beautifully elegant and determined fiancée, the stage is full of riveting performances. Voysey’s brothers are more than mere mouthpieces representing church, army and the artistic life (failed) in the work of tremulous Mark Tandy, the hilariously booming and bullying Andrew Woodall and the quivering, idealistic Martin Hutson.
Max Beerbohm hailed the third act revelation to the family after old Voysey’s funeral as “the high point of English ironic comedy” and Gill’s cast is frozen in shocked profile, an indelible image of English society rocking onto the back foot. One hundred years after its premiere at the Court, Granville Barker’s classic remains a play for today with high style and true vengeance.
Simply superb acting, a thoroughly engaging and topical play, marvellous costumes, an all round enjoyable and sumptuous production. People who don't like it should stick to Footlose. - 86.136.128.60)
22 May 06
This production proves yet again what an great writer Granville-Barker was. The production and the acting are superb. Dominic West as young Voysey gives the performance of his life - but with no show or fussiness. A lesson in great acting. - 80.177.231.164)
21 May 06
A production of immense subtlety, beautifully acted and designed. The producer had thought things out coherently, blending sound effects, lighting, costumes and sets into a a very satifying whole. And the play proved itself topical and relevant, not just an Edwardian museum piece. One of the most satisfying dramatic events to be found on the London stage for a long time. - 88.107.28.28)
20 May 06
Overall well worth seeing
Second half better than the first
But the pace seems too slow
And why the annoying scene changes - 213.86.133.215)
10 May 06
This revival proves that this is a much better play than I remember from previous productions. Its themes prove timeless and its dialogue much wittier. Everything about this production oozes quality. It would be hard to find a greater emsemble on any stage. The attention to detail of the staging is astonishing. The result is terrific. - 86.130.208.107)
10 May 06
Heavily indebted to Ibsen but a good meaty drama with strong characterisation and acting. - 84.64.142.126)
06 May 06
I've been wanting to see this classic for some time and was very disappointed by this dry production. I agree with a lot of what's been said below - good sets and some very good acting, although I was sorry to find Julian Glover didn't seem to settle into his role very well. I saw it a few previews in, just before press night, and the scene changes were still very long, although that didn't especially bother me.
It does pick up towards the end of the first half but, for me, it never quite delivered what it promised - and I feel that's down to the production rather than the play. - 194.80.238.40)
27 Apr 06
Saw it on Press Night. Good production, good acting - but I thought the play was a piece of dull, uninspiring theatre. The couple next to us did leave after the first half. The scene changes were slow - but I loved the sets. Although there was a very loud crash during one of the scene changes!! Recently seen The History Boys, Pillars of the Community, Once in a Lifetime and Measure for Measure and sadly although I reiterate that the cast and director were very good - this play did not match up to any of the other productions I've seen there. - 84.12.175.157)
26 Apr 06
I agree with the first review, but after a clunky first scene, it got better and the secondary characters came into their own. Unlike the similar-ish Pillars Of The Community it's not particularly thrilling, and the play didn't seem to know where it was going or how it wanted to end. I saw the second preview, so the slow scene changes will sort itself out. It's old-fashioned, but it passed the time. - 86.143.218.10)
20 Apr 06
I'm ashamed to admit it but I was tempted to leave at the interval... and I can't remember that ever happening at the National. Dusty, dull and dated, it was lifted by good performances by Dominic West, Andrew Woodall and Martin Hutson - and the promise of a livelier, intriguing second half. The previews have just started, so it's probably unfair to criticise it too much but the pace, the length (three hours) and disruptive, sluggish scene changes made it one of my least enjoyable nights in the Lyttelton. I'll be very interested to see what Mssrs. de Jongh, Spencer, Billington and Morley make of it... - 193.130.127.205)
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.