Synopsis The play explores the extent to which an art dealer will go to get a sale, and the moral hurdles which she must overcome along the way. Simone is an art dealer who is trying to crack into a new, wealthier market. She is given the opportunity to sell a Brett Whitely painting, and has guaranteed the artist a minimum of 2 million Dollars for the sale. It is not worth that much, and her relationship and apartment are under threat if she fails to find a buyer. Simone conducts a private auction between three interested buyers, and has to pull strings along the way to get the bids rolling.
Up for Grabs may ostensibly be about high art but it sinks pretty low to prove it.
Aspiring art dealer Loren's score of a lifetime has turned into a nightmare. She's had to guarantee she'll sell her client's Jackson Pollock for an inflated £20 million and risks losing home and husband, let alone commission, if she doesn't. As a result, she's willing to do just about anything to pry open the chequebooks of three potential buyers - including having lesbian sex with one while watched by her husband, unable to participate after a botched penile enlargement operation, and enabling another, an overweight, homophobic businessman, to 'take it up the ass' with an enormous dildo.
Any plot synopsis, of course, is beside the point, because the draw for Up for Grabs' UK premiere has nothing to do with the play and everything to do with its casting. In her performance as Loren, Madonna (billed as Madonna Ritchie in the programme) - making her West End debut - must be given an A for effort. It's not an easy role, nor a small one. She's onstage the entire time, lurking about even when other characters take the limelight. She's not terrible either: she doesn't flub her lines too often or fall over and she looks fantastic.
But neither is Madonna much good. She can't project and at points, especially during the opening monologue, is almost inaudible. She also seems to mistake motion for emotion, buckling her knees and flailing her arms but rarely expressing much and certainly not the fear and desperation required of Loren. "It's terrifying," she says while crunching a mint, her face an unconvincing blank.
Luckily, there's some able support, most notably in the form of Daniel Pino as the coked-up but incapacitated dotcom millionaire and Sian Thomas as the prim English art consultant who lets her hair down. Jeremy Herbert's back-projected, sliding-room set looks ultra-modern, but it's cold and overly complicated (technical difficulties caused the cancellation of three previews and, on the night I attended, the set broke down, prompting an extra 20-minute interval). And Laurence Boswell's direction never seems to quite gel, dragging in some places and spluttering in others.
However, this - as well as the performers' apparent unease - may have less to do with Boswell's lack of skill than with the evening's biggest disappointment. The audience, or rather the contingent whose reactions bordered on the hysterical. Whooping and cheering throughout (and drowning out innumerable lines of dialogue), peering up her nose and blouse with opera glasses (even from the vantagepoint of the front of the stalls), snapping a stream of blinding flash photographs (despite bag checks on the way in), stampeding over one another to get closer at the curtain call and even bellowing Madonna's name during quiet scenes of crisis for her character. Ironically, by such behaviour, these die-hard fans show their idol extreme disrespect.
Small wonder the lady looks so grim when she takes her bow; I'm more embarrassed for her fans than for her.
Amazingly Madonna was not the worst thing about this production, the shear puerile futility of the writing upstaged her limited expressions and vocal attributes. However she did look great. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
12 Jul 02
I saw the show Friday, and was very impressed with it.Being one of Madonna's biggest fans, even I was suprised at how good her acting was, especially as she's on stage practically the whole time and plays such a difficult role.
The play was quite rude at times, but all in the comedy sense-therefore it wasn't rude just for the sake of it.I particularly liked the way in which Madonna involved the audience on scenes, and also I thought the stage effects were very clever and worked well.People have criticised Madonna in this play, but even my mother who came with me and isn't a Madonna fan said she was very impressed with the level of Madonna's acting.I thought beforehand I wouldn't be able to concentrate on the play with Madonna being infront of me, but I was able to with ease, although I must admit on the opening scene when that screen goes up and she's standing there, it is a surreal moment indeed!
An enjoyable, funny, and above all, fantastic experience which should be praised rather than criticised simply because the lead actress has had one or two film flops in the past-which actress hasn't? - USER: Whatsonstage.com
30 Jun 02
Like everybody else, I bought my ticket for the thrill of seeing Maddy live and that's what I got. I also got a few genuine laughs and some excellent acting from the rest of the cast. What's to whinge about ? We know that Maddy ain't the greatest actress in the world but she's the Most Famous Woman There Is so who cares ? It was a great evening. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
24 Jun 02
The play is pretentious nonsense. Madonna cannot act and, if she wants to act, she should go to drama school. Bouncers should not have been allowed in the theatre. An utter waste of an evening. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
23 Jun 02
The night I saw the play must have been full of theatrical fans rather than Madonna fans because there was no hysterical cheering when she appeared. On the whole the content of the play was slightly disappointing, the supporting cast were very strong indeed - especially the wonderful Sian Thomas. The set was very good but felt very cold (unlike the auditorium!) but then there was no love among the characters so I suppose the set fitted the play and emotions. What can I say about Madonna - adequate. Very brave of her she certainly doesn't need to do the play - it is obviously a challenge to her and she copes remarkably well being on stage virtually the whole time. OK she won't win an Olivier Award but I dare anyone not to take a sharp intake of breath when the screen lifts and there large as life is one of the World's true superstars! Of course we cheered at the end and felt very priviliged to be in her presence for 2 hours! Thanks Madonna! - USER: Whatsonstage.com
17 Jun 02
Saw it last night. For me Madonna was quite bad. The play was ok, but I was there, like everyone, to see her. She just can't act and should stick to the music business. Exposing herself like that in a medium she's not familiar with is not going to do her any good. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
06 Jun 02
I was actually pleasantly surprised at how entertaining the whole thing was. Having read many of the comments about Madonna's performance, I can only assume she has improved over time as I found her acting very good. Somewhat outclassed by the other actors perhaps, but far from embarrassing. Certainly, there was no problem with her voice projection and diction - I was able to hear every word from my seat in the Dress Circle. I was sorry that the role of 'Loren' didn't give Madonna more to get her teeth into. From the synopsis of the plot, I had imagined her character to be a manipulative bitch, whereas in fact, she was honest to a fault, simply carried along by the scheming of the rival bidders, not manipulating them at all. It was good to see that the audience reation was enthusiastic without being hysterical. Perhaps all the die-hard Madonna fans had tickets for earlier performances in the run. A standing ovation was nevertheless inevitable, but I felt that it was deserved by everyone involved for providing a very entertaining show. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
06 Jun 02
This is a once in a life time experience. Damn the play, Madonna shines! Boswell's Production is first rate. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
04 Jun 02
The play itself is cliche-ridden with no particular savour. The set and lighting however are ingenious. Madonna looks great on stage but it is her gifted cast that save the show. Her adoring fan won't be disappointed nevertheless to catch glimpses of her for two hours. Don't expect to get her autographs afterwards as she leaves the building right after the curtain call! - USER: Whatsonstage.com
21 May 02
Just got back from seeing Madonna in "Up for Grabs". The play is only okay - it is a comedy that is not that funny with elements of drama that are not that dramatic. The two elements don't blend together in this play - they curdle into an unsightly mess.
I must admit that it was a complete thrill to see Madonna from so close up - row D of the Stalls - like Nicole Kidman she is one of those women I could stare at for hours..
Madonna made a great choice of the play since she can basically be Madonna for two hours - it is very much an extension of her stage persona - she gets to swear, kiss a woman and wave a huge Dildo at a man - that type of thing.. After a shaky first speach she turned in a reasonable performance (was it wise to get the audience riled up again after they had just settled down with comments about being a "materialistic girl" in the opening scene !!).
Basically Madonna plays a woman who has to secure 20 million dolloars for a Jackson Pollack painting - or she will owe the deficit between the price gained and the figure promised. The plot involes her dissolving marriage and playing off several wealthy clients against each other - occasionally having to perform certain acts to gain bids...
The supporting cast are more accomplished actors that Madonna but in the end I guess she holds her own. I would like to see her on stage again but I wouldn't fancy giving the play another viewing since it shouted average from the get go - the playwright lucked out in finding a superstar to open it in the west end so that it sold out (and the money existed for a stunning design of video screens showing the action from the stage mounted cameras and moving platforms). If it wasn't for Madonna it would be destined for TKTS in a week and if they opted for an open run it would be closing in a couple of months in my opinion. It has derivate elements with part of the plot straight from "The lost Language of Cranes" - USER: Whatsonstage.com
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.