Synopsis Adam is a non-descript young student who works part-time in an art museum and a video store just to pay his way through college. That is, until he meets Evelyn, at which moment his life changes. Evelyn instils a new-found confidence in Adam, making him feel better about himself by changing his appearance, helping him lose weight, and giving him fashion advice. Soon Adam is attracting attention he has never had before. But how far is Adam willing to go to make his relationship with Evelyn work? And how much will he change his perception of himself from what he used to be to what he believes he wants to be?
Originally premiered by the Almeida in a shape-shifting space that the theatre was temporarily occupying in King’s Cross in May 2001, Neil LaBute’s The Shape of Things now returns to London and undergoes another change of shape, space and place to appear in the West End.
Of course, the mutability of people, places, art and relationships is one of the principal themes of LaBute’s play, and as it tests the subjectivity inherent in the transactions and perceptions of its characters to each of those things, the play itself has now become another item to line up for consideration of our ever-shifting reactions beside them.
As with David Mamet’s Oleanna, also recently revived in the West End and similarly testing the limits of our tolerance for an explicit manipulation of a situation, it’s impossible on a second viewing of this play to recreate the galvanising surprise of its overwhelming climax. But this new production not only prepares you for that revelation in markedly different ways (from a simpler design solution to different musical punctuation), but also the play’s minutely observed study of human nature (and nurture) also takes on a different complexion when you know where it's going to.
In the process, the possibly heretical thought briefly entered my mind that perhaps this was a play not just about phoney art but a piece of phoney art itself, that cheats the audience into buying into this journey just as potently as the story has its characters cheating themselves or each other about where they really stand with each other.
In other words, the joke may be on us as well as the characters. But who cares when the play is as gripping and potent and funny and ultimately shocking as this? You’ll notice that I’ve not yet turned to the plotting itself, an everyday story about a nerdy young man, Adam (Enzo Cilenti), who sheds his old skin (literally, in the case of a nose that he has refashioned and nails that he stops biting) and an older coat, not to mention his only friends Jenny (Sienna Guillory) and Phillip (James Murray), as his relationship with an art student Evelyn (Alicia Witt) transforms him not just physically but also emotionally.
But it’s not fair to say more than that for fear of giving it away. And though the four actors of Julian Webber’s production don’t have quite the febrile intensity of LaBute’s own original staging (whose performances were forever preserved in a subsequent film version), the play still exerts a morbid and gripping fascination, whether you’re seeing it for the first time or, just as impressively, seeing it again.
Very enjoyable story of an art postgrad and her relationship with a speccy nerd. As the affair progresses, he finds himself bending increasingly to her whims regarding his appearance, sprucing himself up to satisfy her. But she has an agenda of her own... It's very lively, well-paced, well-acted, nicely lit, and it has something to say that not everyone will agree with but will spark some debates and discussions. It's closing on 12 June, which is a shame as it deserves a longer run, but it's just not getting bums on seats. Take my advice and give it a go, if you haven't already. It won't rescue it, but it'll provide you with some top-notch entertainment. BACKDRIFTER - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.74.155.116)
02 Jun 04
This show was very cool, pretty funny and full of surprises. I didn't know too much about it and that's probably a good thing. A nasty ending, too, but fun. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (4.159.238.196)
29 May 04
An awesome night at the theatre! Funny and savage and moving, all in one. I didn't know this script and didn't see the twist coming. Everything worked--I really loved Alicia Witt as the artist/student. I think I might even agree with her philsophies! She made me mad at times as a character, but her acting made me understand the person underneath. Highly recommended! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (4.159.237.39)
23 May 04
Finally, a show with some blood & guts in the West End! Nice to see something that makes you think and feel in equal measures. Loved the staging, the actors (Alicia Witt, in particular, was a revelation in this quicksilver role), and the fluidity of the set. Loved the play when it was done before--loved seeing it all again, even when I knew what would happen. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (4.158.45.209)
22 May 04
Loved it, not a lot, but a little. I thought the performances were strong and the play, though short (a blessing) was tight and somewhat thought provoking. It could be a load of studenty nonsense I suppose but was well done. I like the set too, even though it as very derivative in the sense that When Harr.... and Sexual Perversity.... used ostensibly the same mechanism to move from scene to scene. It makes watching a play more like watching TV or a movie which, for a modern audience may be OK. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.244.178.194)
21 May 04
I had not seen this play before & so derived the full benefit of the denouement which is considerable. Beautifully crafted, tight writing, pacey & classy performances & the sexiest set I have seen. I will definitely see it again & relish the foreknowledge of what is to come. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (12.42.51.28)
19 May 04
The activity clearly visible in the wings throughout is a welcome diversion from what is on the stage. Can the director please explain
a) why people taping themselves on video have the monitor pointing away from themselves b) why in a scene depicting the end of an artist's launch party, the buffet table is pristine with none of the food or drink having been consumed c) why the actors don't have anything in their cups when they go to Starbucks
but they have practical food and drink in all other scenes d) why they didn't employ a director who could get some kind of emotionally engaged performances out of four apparently competent actors. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.152.238.67)
Opened 5 Jun 1913. The Mousetrap opened here on 25 Nov 52 (a palindromic date - 25/11/52) and later transferred to St Martin's (Mar74). 460 seats. Likely to be split in two under a major re-design by William Dudley. From 1996 for a couple of years this theatre housed the Royal Court Upstairs while their Sloane Square theatre was refurbished. After refurbishment it was re-opened as the New Ambassadors. An [ATG] member. Society of London Theatre member. Following acquirition by Sir Stephen Waley-Cohen in April 2007 the theatre name reverted to The Ambassadors
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.