Use the form below to search for tickets on your desired date. Dates from
Synopsis The Scottish Play - theatrical types consider saying its name to be unlucky! Thrust into power by his overwhelming desires and an over ambitious wife, Macbeth finds his only security is to murder and murder again. From "When shall we three meet again" to "is this a dagger I see before me" this is a powerful Shakespearean drama. Supported by the Macbeth Commissioning Circle.
Chichester Festival’s sell-out production of Macbeth, starring Patrick Stewart in the title role, transferred last night (26 September 2007, previews from 24 September) to the West End’s Gielgud Theatre, where it runs for ten weeks only to 1 December (See Also Today’s 1st Night Photos).
Macbeth marks the third Bard turn in the West End this year for Patrick Stewart. Just prior to Chichester this summer, where he also appeared in Twelfth Night, he was at the Novello Theatre from January through to March in the Royal Shakespeare Company transfers of Antony and Cleopatra and The Tempest (See News, 25 Aug 2006). The latter was directed by Headlong artistic director Rupert Goold, who has also directed Macbeth.
The production won almost universal raves – and plentiful five-star ratings – from overnight critics. It’s the “Macbeth of a lifetime”, trumpeted the Evening Standard’s Nicholas de Jongh. Those who had seen it in Chichester deemed the transfer “triumphant”, enjoying the highly “inventive” direction of Rupert Goold and the “brilliant” acting even more on second viewing. Patrick Stewart’s performance was hailed as, perhaps, the best of his career, with his Macbeth well matched by Kate Fleetwood’s Lady M. Amongst the supporting roles, Michael Feast, Martin Turner and Tim Treloar were frequently singled out for kudos, while Anthony Ward’s abattoir design and Adam Cork’s “deeply unsettling” also added greatly to the atmosphere for critics.
Michael Coveney on Whatsonstage.com (five stars) - “There are so many brilliant ideas in Rupert Goold’s production of Macbeth … that you wonder if the whole thing can hang together. It does, just about, because the jolting of the nightmare Eastern European tyranny of Macbeth up against the insistent contrast between Scotland and England in the second half of the play survives all the wrenches forced upon it by the concept. And the whole evening is so exciting … The Indian summer of Patrick Stewart’s stage career continues with his utterly convincing poet soldier whose uncanny facial resemblance to Lenin makes his great-coated bluster and cold-blooded perseverance all the more terrifying. His level of performance is matched by Kate Fleetwood’s square-jawed, slinky Lady Macbeth, a trophy wife who finds her social climbing ambitions running out of control … When Stewart delivers the ‘Tomorrow’ dirge to his wife’s corpse stretched out on a trolley, it really is like watching the end of an era in, say, Romania or former Yugoslavia. As a political thriller, this Macbeth combines all the elements of the corrupt tyranny envisaged by George Orwell and expressed again in the great recent movie The Lives of Others. Plus you get Shakespeare’s ineffable poetry!”
Michael Billington in the Guardian (five stars) – “Transferring a play is a tricky business. But in its move from the Minerva Chichester to the refurbished Gielgud, Rupert Goold's spellbinding Macbeth has lost none of its visceral excitement, political resonance or textual clarity … What captures the imagination is Goold's ability to contextualise … Directorial inventiveness is also matched by brilliant acting. Patrick Stewart's Macbeth starts as a reflective soldier who pauses before using the word ‘murder’, and develops into an insecure monster whose most chilling tactic is a dangerous levity. Stewart has done nothing finer, and he is superbly partnered by Kate Fleetwood's Lady M, whose capacity to imagine dashing out her child's brains is an index of a deeply disturbed mind. Michael Feast's Macduff, reacting to the reported death of his own children with a weighted silence, also invests the character with an agonising sense of guilt. Martin Turner's Banquo and Tim Treloar's Ross add to the atmosphere of feverish suspicion, and Adam Cork's music and sound design are imbued with gothic horror. A traditionally difficult play is magnificently realised.”
Charles Spencer in the Daily Telegraph - “What bloody man is that? It's a blood-splattered Patrick Stewart, that's who, giving a truly great performance in Rupert Goold's brilliantly inventive, heart-stoppingly scary production of Shakespeare's portrait of a serial killer … There is barely a longueur in Goold's three-hour production, which is almost indecently packed with inspired ideas. In Anthony Ward's superbly disconcerting design almost all the action is set in some hellish subterranean kitchen … The production, inspired by both the Stalinist terror and Orwell's 1984, shows how Macbeth builds a tyranny of fear in which surveillance, torture and random killings are routine. With its frequent use of video, Adam Cork's deeply unsettling electronic score, and constant jolting coups de theatre, the play owes a debt to both classic film noir and Quentin Tarantino … So charismatic is Stewart as an actor, that he can make the simple act of preparing a ham sandwich one of the scariest things you've ever seen. But his Macbeth is much more than some psycho killer from a B movie. Stewart recognises that the tragedy of Macbeth is that he always understood the consequences of killing and in the later scenes, in his beautifully delivered soliloquies, he shows a man who realises he has rendered his life meaningless by his actions … There is outstanding support right through the ranks … This is the greatest production of Macbeth I have ever seen.”
Nicholas de Jongh in the Evening Standard (five stars) – “Rupert Goold's Macbeth of a lifetime is almost permanently set in the vicinity of a kitchen sink and a refrigerator. It manages, though, freshly to convey the elemental sense of surprise, shock and supernatural horror that must have attended the tragedy's early 17th-century performances and has long since been lost. Transferred from Chichester's Minerva studio, where critics and audiences were enraptured, Goold's production maintains its mesmerising power on the Gielgud's larger, conventional, proscenium space. Patrick Stewart's Macbeth, the instigator of these atrocities, catches both the man's fanaticism and his vacillating anguish. I have not seen a production of the play which makes you so aware of the precarious balance of power that exists between the couple or the way in which domestic, metaphysical and murderous concerns jostle for attention … As if hypnotised by the hectoring voluptuousness and mocking vehemence of Kate Fleetwood's steely, self-sacrificial Lady Macbeth he embarks upon murder with reluctance. Both actors thrillingly register the fragility of their nerves as the bloody deed is done and they rinse trembling, bloody hands in the kitchen sink … This historic production enjoys a perfect thrill-factor.”
Benedict Nightingale in The Times (three stars) – “Questions must be asked of a revival that won uniform raves at Chichester during my summer break. Isn’t it desperately busy and sometimes distractingly fussy? It amazes me that Patrick Stewart and Kate Fleetwood give such fine performances when (for instance) one is required to uncork and pour wine for his guests during a major soliloquy and the other to dive and quake beneath a trolley just after Duncan’s murder. It’s all gloriously inventive … It’s also all very political … But Goold’s production is more notable for fitful brilliance than for consistency of approach or fidelity to the text’s demands. Yet maybe we should blame Shakespeare, not Goold, if we can’t fully understand why Fleetwood, at first as splendidly fearsome a Lady Macbeth as I’ve seen, ends up washing her hands with bleach beneath a tap spouting blood. The hints of vulnerability in between can’t explain so huge a transition. As for Stewart … it’s a remarkable performance: successively wry, watchful, grieving, angry, astonished, agonised, dangerous, exhausted, bitter, nihilistic. But the suggestion that he’s another Stalin is another example of over-clever direction. Stewart is a lot more interesting than that.”
There are so many brilliant ideas in Rupert Goold’s production of Macbeth – which has transferred triumphantly to the Gielgud for a ten-week season from the small Minerva in Chichester – that you wonder if the whole thing can hang together. It does, just about, because the jolting of the nightmare Eastern European tyranny of Macbeth up against the insistent contrast between Scotland and England in the second half of the play survives all the wrenches forced upon it by the concept. And the whole evening is so exciting.
The world of the play is an abattoir, kitchen, hospital and prison all in one, with the witches supervising episodes of murderous hospitality in nurses’ uniforms. The “temple-haunting martlet” that Duncan (Paul Shelley) so enjoys is under the chopper and on the menu. The place is fitted out in Anthony Ward’s design with white tiles and an ominous, cranking lift that delivers victims to their fate in a sinister hell hole.
The Indian summer of Patrick Stewart’s stage career continues with his utterly convincing poet soldier whose uncanny facial resemblance to Lenin makes his great-coated bluster and cold-blooded perseverance all the more terrifying. His level of performance is matched by Kate Fleetwood’s square-jawed, slinky Lady Macbeth, a trophy wife who finds her social climbing ambitions running out of control.
Duncan’s murder is a blood-boltered off-stage ritual, the murder of Banquo (Martin Turner) an espionage-style scuffle on a packed commuter train (“night’s black agents to their preys do rouse” indeed) and the passage of time, as the reign of terror bites into the national psyche, conveyed brilliantly by the projected film of fascist rallies and the ominous, encroaching thrum of Adam Cork’s music and sound score.
Lady Macduff (Suzanne Burden) and her children are promoted to an earlier point in the narrative so their destruction is all the more poignant. Scott Handy’s Malcolm and Michael Feast’s Macduff – both roles fleshed out beyond their usual shadowiness – are listening to an Ivor Novello song recital (“My dearest dear”) before the spell winds up to shatter the last shred of civilisation.
When Stewart delivers the “Tomorrow” dirge to his wife’s corpse stretched out on a trolley, it really is like watching the end of an era in, say, Romania or former Yugoslavia. As a political thriller, this Macbeth combines all the elements of the corrupt tyranny envisaged by George Orwell and expressed again in the great recent movie The Lives of Others. Plus you get Shakespeare’s ineffable poetry!
- Michael Coveney
NOTE: The following THREE-STAR review dates from May 2007 and this production’s original run in Chichester.
There have been many stagings of Macbeth? that have drawn parallels between 20th-century tyrannies and Macbeth’s very own reign of terror, but there have been very few as explicit as Rupert Goold’s reading of him as Stalin.
Longer Macbeths are also rare: this one has an almost operatic sweep as Goold takes Shakespeare’s second shortest play and stretches the evening to more than three hours. This is a drama often played without an interval, a staging that always seems appropriate to me as it allows us to get caught up with Macbeth’s giddying fall from military golden boy to “hell-hound” without contemplating too quickly the internal contradictions in Shakespeare’s play.
But by opening out, Goold allows the full horror of the Macbeth tyranny to sink in. There are occasions where it goes over the top: the arrival of Banquo’s ghost is heralded by The Shining-like streaks of blood emerging from a lift and the killing of Macduff’s family is rather too much Grand Guignol.
Unusually, the interval comes within the banquet scene rather than after it; even more unusually, part of it is played twice (with Banquo and without). It’s hard to understand the point of this: does Goold think that the Chichester audience won’t understand what’s going on unless it’s spelled out? There are other discrepancies: Ross seems to lead a charmed life; one minute he’s being tortured, the next he’s seen at the point of a gun and then he fetches up in England apparently at liberty. That doesn’t exactly suggest a state where “each day a new gash is added to the wound”.
Patrick Stewart’s Macbeth is ample compensation though. His superbly-spoken Scot is a portrayal of an opportunistic soldier who has seized his chance and finds tyranny sits well on his shoulders. The supernatural element is slightly underplayed, suggesting a despot who needs little prompting. Kate Fleetwood’s icily sexy Lady Macbeth is a willing conspirator without being the motivational force that some productions suggest.
The murder of Banquo (Martin Turner) is particularly impressive. He’s cut down fleeing on a bus, rather than taken after a day’s hunting – it’s a powerful assassination and one that makes dramatic sense. There’s a very strong Macduff from Michael Feast and a smooth-talking Malcolm from Scott Handy (although I found the resemblance to David Cameron rather disconcerting).
From the strident electronic music to the harsh lighting; from the video backdrop to the underground setting, part morgue, part torture chamber, punctuated by the ghostly clanging of the lift, this is a determinedly modern Macbeth, one that reminds us, once again, of the power of this play.
Although I have some reservations about Rupert Goold's direction (the withches and Seyton in particular) there is no doubt that the Stalinist setting is a triumph. Macbeth is a political thriller and this production mirrors the internecine struggles between Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky with the addition of moments of horror and a scary sound design by Adam Cork. Unfortunately Patrick Stewart was still struggling with a throat infection so his performance seemed to be holding something back, but there was excellent support, particularly from Michael Feast, Martin Turner and Tim Treloar. However, unlike the RSC some of the smaller roles were very poorly acted. Kate Fleetwood's Lady Macbeth was sexually charged and full of dangerous ambition - she strangely reminded me of the wife of a former PM. Goold's Macbeth is undeniably exciting and visceral but not quite the definitive version some have felt it to be. - David Baxter
29 Nov 07
A mixed night. Patrick Stewart gave an assured performance, but I don't think he always plummed the full depths of Macbeth's inner turmoil. Kate Fleetwood was great with the verse, but there was definite pretending rather than feeling going on at times. Basically, you could tell that the cast had been doing the play for some time. I don't know what he was like earlier in the run, but Michael Guest was an embarrasment as Macduff. He reminded me of the ham actors in that episode of "Blackadder The Third". The directing was very good on the whole, paticularly eveything around the Witches' scenes. I did think Banquo's murder was overly gimmicky and laid on the Stalinist context with a trowel. I'm glad I saw it, but I do think some of the critics have got a bit over excited. Just because they didn't have to sit through yet another awful "Macbeth", doesn't mean it was definitive. - Nick
20 Nov 07
I am really glad I managed to see this because for me as a Director, it had some beautiful staging ideas and themes which I genuinelly appreciated. My favourite being the scene change from Banquo's death to the banquet - inspired! Lights fabulous, sound a bit too OTT, I didn't like the "Witch Rap" totally unnecessary and the dialogue was lost. Likewise the opening - great idea, but dialogue lost. I feel that lots of the verse and therefore the meaning was lost, a friend said that most people know the story, I disagree, it is the director and casts job to tell a story, not to presume anything.
I would say that the production was bigger than the actors on stage, except Lady Macbeth and Macduff who were equal to it. The majority of the cast were quite simply out done by the Rupert Goold and his Design Teams ideas. Worth seeing, but with a stronger cast, and a better Macbeth this could have been amazing. - Alassin Sane
15 Nov 07
ps - that was supposed to be 2 stars.
pps - I wouldnt mind betting that some of the 5 stars below are from the production company. DONT BELIEVE THE HYPE! - bb
02 Nov 07
Well I'm glad its not just me that was underwhelmed. I was really looking forward to this and had paid over £50(!!!) for the ticket on the strength of almost universally astonishing reviews. I was really disappointed. The idea of the Soviet setting is great but really generalised in its execution. Lots of flouncy actoriness and shoulder slapping jollity when these are supposed to be war hardened, Soviet soldiers who are paranoid about who might be next for the chop or who is being spied on. Look at Putin - THAT is scary and you wouldnt catch him mincing around. And whoever the goose-stepping soldier was would have been shot for that shabby effort - where was that famous well drilled straight back and straight leg. No sense of power, fear or status from Duncan who, within this setting would have to have been something of a tyrant himself even if loved by his men. He looked a bit like a young Stalin which could have been really interesting but he wouldnt stop shuffling around and patting people. When all the soldiers come into the kitchen none of the staff bat an eyelid - where is the status system?Really generalised uniforms and 'combats' (as in Trevor Nunn's equally over-hyped Hamlet) which might be because of Chichester's Limited budget but it just looks lazy. Also everyone comes on with really clean boots!? Why? They've just been on the battlefield. At one point Macbeth asks for his armour and is given a modern flak jacket so when exactly are we in Soviet Russia? The Macduff children are all dressed like they are at the school down the road from me! The 'soldiers' dont look as if they know how to hold a gun - one of them uses his middle finger for the trigger which he obviously thinks looks quirky a la Tarantino. And guns on stage - bangs from the overused sound system look silly - why not use ones that go off? In the battle at the end an unarmed soldier thinks he has captured Macbeth only to be shot by him. But why, in the middle of a battle, didnt he have a gun?? Lots of little niggly things but they all grate when a period or setting has been established and then it is constantly broken. And the final knife/pistol duel was so stupid. Why wouldnt Macbeth just have shot him straight away even if as we find out he has no bullets left. Then when they finally do fight with knives it looks flabby, choreographed and totally unscarey. Look at the fight with a knife in the film Saving Private Ryan - utterly terrifying which ends up as a messy battle of stregth wrestling match. This looks like the Royal Ballet were brought in for help!
I suppose these could all be seen as minor points if there was an amazing central performance but there isnt. Patrick Stewart is just not up to it - you dont believe him. And by the end his voice was going and I couldnt hear everything and I was half way back in the stalls. I would say this could have just been a bad night but I saw him in 'The Tempest' and the same thing happened. And there are funny noises going on that I think are supposed to be something emotional. God only knows what but they just come out as funny. He resorts to playing for cheap laughs with little camp moments that the diehard trekkies laugh nervously at. Macduff kept running out of breath too.
But Kate Fleetwood was FANTASTIC. Amazing voice, genuinely terrifying and really moving when she starts cracking. You somehow ended up really feeling for her. This production should be called 'Lady Macbeth'. Scott Handy was also excellent as Malcolm. You could understand everything he was saying as clear as a bell and when he was given the task of playing the whole of his final speech to a silly severed head he pulled off the horror of it brilliantly.
One final thing - why oh why oh why do the witch/nurses have to rap Hubble bubble ...is to appeal to the yoof of today? I was unaware of the postwar Soviet rap culture as I beleive were the others falling of their seats with laughter.
So why has this show got such raves? I think there are 3 possibilites: 1 - Critics are trying to fight against the unstoppable tide of musicals in the West End by over compensating. Duping people into pay £50 a ticket when it is not worth it will not help.
2 - Critics are being bribed. This is big business, people.
3 - I am in the minority.
I think it might be 2.
rant over.
- bb
02 Nov 07
I must say that I don't understand what all the fuss is about, as I certainly didn't find this "the Macbeth of a lifetime" as one critic apparently labelled it. It was good, but certainly not that good, and I was far from impressed with Patrick Stewart's performance, which I would describe as adequate, but hardly more, too much technique and too little inhabiting the character, almost like watching some sort of acting-by-numbers. Deeply disappointing and uninspiring, and his performance brings down the grade for this production in my opinion.
By far, the standout performance of this production was that of Kate Fleetwood as Lady Macbeth, oh my goodness! I saw her during the RSC's Complete Works year as Hermione in The Winter's Tale, and as Thaisa in Pericles, and she was good in both, but those are both, well, bland characters I guess you could call them, and given a meatier part as Lady Macbeth she really proves herself. It was an amazingly nuanced and multi-layered performance, way, WAY beyond what Stewart delivered, even though she's about half his age and has much less experienced of performing the Bard. I hope that she gets the accolades that she so richly deserves when this heads over to New York.
[POSSIBLE SPOILERS]
The production is a clever one, and it's a matter of personal taste if you like certain things I suppose, but I'm sick of seeing productions where Lady Macduff's part has been padded out (probably in order to attract a bigger name to play the part) beyond what's in the play, in this case even reallocating other characters' lines to her. To have her instead of Lennox - plus the Macduffs' three children - turn up at Macbeth's castle with Macduff when Duncan has been murdered, and then again when Macduff is on his way to Fife instead of to Macbeth's coronation makes little sense. If his family are such suave travellers, why would he suddenly leave them behind when he heads off to England? The WOS ratings system only allows for whole stars, but I'd rate this at about 3.5 stars.
- //Jenny
23 Oct 07
Quite simply one of the best interpretations of Shakespeare I've ever seen. There isn't a weak link in the casting; this is no star vehicle for Patrick Stewart. The modern setting works brilliantly. I cannot praise it more highly. How thriling to see 'Full House' signs and hear an audience cheer a Shakespeare play on an October Monday on Shaftsbury Avenue! - Gareth James
16 Oct 07
This is an exceptional production.
Unusual staging and design which works incredibly well. The three witches in their dour, starched nurses outfits are evil personified. And I love the wicthes rap!
The acting is to be commended. Chris Nolan as Seyton stood out along with the central performances from Patrick Stewart and in particular Kate Fleetwood who gave the performances of their lives.
Dark, harsh, evil and compelling must see theatre! - Paul Wallis
12 Oct 07
Astonishingly good theatre. An exceptionally talented cast, stunning design and imagery, a fresh but nonetheless valid take on many key moments in the play... simply perfect. I never thought that a play so familiar to me would hold me in such thrall for 3 hours. I was exhausted by the final curtain. Go. Now. - KJC
09 Oct 07
Worst production I have ever seen.Dull,poorly acted.Patrick Stewart gives the worst performance I have seen from him.Utterly disappointed. - Richard Gill
Originally opened 27Dec 1906 as The Hicks Theatre. Formerly The Globe, renamed in 1994 in part in tribute to Sam Wanamaker, so that his dream of a new Shakespeare Globe would be the only Globe in London. 983 seats. Society of London Theatre member. In 1999 Delfont Mackintosh Theatres Limited acquired the freehold of the Queen s and the Gielgud Theatres from Christ s Hospital, Horsham. The lease of the Gielgud Theatre will revert back from Really Useful Theatres to Delfont Mackintosh Theatres in March 2006 after which there are plans to refurbish both venues and to build a 500-seat theatre, The Sondheim, above the Queen s. This will be the first new theatre in Shaftesbury Avenue since 1931.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.