Use the form below to search for tickets on your desired date. Dates from
Synopsis For the past 32 years Honor has been married to George. A prominent journalist, George is to feature in a book on the Movers and Shakers but when the beguiling young Claudia arrives to pen his profile, he's unsettled to have his own interview techniques - and a few other tricks - turned on him. When George leaves Honor for Claudia, their lives - including that of the couple's insecure twentysomething daughter - are thrown into turmoil.
The new production of Australian playwright Joanna Murray-Smith’s Honour that has opened at Wyndham’s, just three years after it originally received its British premiere in an entirely different staging and cast at the National, is now the third one I’ve seen, since I also saw its Broadway premiere in 1998 (in a different production again). And while comparisons are invidious, it’s also amazing how insidiously the play has been undermined by a staging that is altogether less eloquent and resonant, but also to do with just how fundamentally miscast three of its four actors are now, too.
The last time around, in the intimate surrounds of the Cottesloe -- where the audience were arranged on two sides, like eavesdroppers to its portrait of domestic upheaval and emotion that follows when a middle-aged husband suddenly walks out of a 32-year marriage after he falls for a 28-year-old woman who has come to interview him -- I was overwhelmed by this forensically observed triangle of a betrayer, the betrayed and the catalyst for it.
But while on that occasion it was acted with the raw, shocking immediacy of wrenching feeling and pain by a cast that included Eileen Atkins as the wounded wife, Corin Redgrave as the husband sending his life into freefall, and Catherine McCormack as the predatory younger woman, here there’s not only the distancing of the pros arch to contend with but also a fatal lack of authenticity to the performances, too.
Diana Rigg may be attempting to go the full distance by daring to appear less than her glamorous usual self with a shock of white-ish hair drawn in a middle-aged bob. But though she is still unparalleled at the bitter, acid put downs that her character lashes out with, she simply doesn’t do vulnerability, and fails to expose the raw nerve endings that are called for as the character comes to grips with the new reality she’s being confronted with.
As the straying husband, Martin Jarvis is too light to be convincing as a man prepared to put his life through the wringer and simply no match for Rigg’s life force; but then Natascha McElhone’s awkward temptress isn’t much of a competition for it, either. Though you can see the physical attraction, McElhone acts with such tentative, halting reactions that it’s difficult to believe that her character would have such power over any man. The play duly threatens to become phoney and unconvincing, instead of wise and wrenching.
The only performance that seems to resonate with an inner life below the surface that everyone else is playing here is recent RADA graduate Georgina Rich as the couple’s student daughter (played at the National by Anna Maxwell Martin). While a realistic book-lined study holds centrestage for most of the action to take place upon, the banks of empty chairs that expressionistically surround it epitomise director David Grindley’s muddled approach to the play: he seemingly wants it to have it both ways, as true-to-life drama and metaphor, too.
I found this play enjoyable to watch but ultimately emotionally thin. It never seemed real to me. I felt Martin Jarvis was too lightweight and Diana Rigg never seemed hurt enough from the break-up of her marriage. We talked a lot about the content of the play after the show so it got us thinking but somehow the dramatic heartbreak that should have been there was missing. Does anyone want a chair? Goodness know what we were supposed to make of that. - 88.104.234.170)
26 Mar 06
Not sure of the play. Nothing new there. But, Diana Rigg and Georgina Rich were excellent. Unfortunately, Martin Jarvis and Natascha McElhone just didn't wash with me.
The crtics had a field day with 'Honour' and all said exactly the same thing - where's the originality? These people are paid for God's sake! But, as Dame Diana once said '(critics) seem to be have been seconded from the sport's section'.
A lot of them said that Dame Diana's performance is understated and not angry enough even I can see that her character's anger was expressed through her daughter!
As for the empty chairs - no idea what they were meant to be but I liked them.
Seen it 3 times so far and the play does grow on you. I go to see Dame Diana. It's worth the price of the ticket just for her! - 84.68.86.128)
07 Mar 06
Joanna Murray-Smith's literate, absorbing script is really a chamber piece meditiation on love, sex, marriage, fidelity, and so looks rather over-stretched on the Wyndhams stage. Nevertheless, there is still alot to enjoy in David Grindley's slick, if chilly production: Diana Rigg's dignity and stillness are haunting, even though I'd've preferred a little more anguish, Martin Jarvis convincingly conveys the cheating husband's guilt and confusion despite awkward physicality, Natascha McElhone's ambitious beauty impressively moves from arrogance to devastation, and Georgina Rich is a genuine find as the distraught daughter. My main problem with the script is that the characters frequently sound as though they're in a play rather than living real life. There is some wonderful acidic humour also, but ultimately the piece isn't as satisfying or substantial as, say, Stoppard's "The Real Thing" or even Peter Nichols' "Passion Play", both of which deal with similar themes. - 195.82.123.181)
06 Mar 06
I can't fully agree with Mark Shenton. Sure, Georgina Rich was emotionally committed. From Row K, I could see the tears glistening on her cheeks. Unfortunately, for most of the play, she acted with her eyes closed. Or maybe she was just looking down at the stage. She may win for truthfulness, but is disqualified on an easily-correctible technicality (the rest of the cast did splendid technically. But failed to convince emotionally.) - 206.28.76.1)
20 Feb 06
The critics which I have read all made (unfavouable) comparisons with the 2003 production with Eileen Atkins and Corin Redgrave.
Having not seen that production I came to this 'fresh'.
A man (Martin Jarvis) married to his wife (Diana Rigg) for 30 years, goes through a late mid-life realtionship crisis with a writer (Natasha McElhone)who is little older than his daughter (Georgina Rich). This story is told in a series of short scenes and could well reflect an 'every day' type scenario.
Some superb cutting remarks on life by Matin and especially by Diana add pointed humour.
I found this an enjoyable evening (good all round performances.) although I also was puzzled by a large part of the stage resembling a warehouse of kitchen chairs, the purpose of which totally eludes me.
If you are a fan of Diana Rigg (and like me fondly remember the Emma Peel days of The Avengers) then go and see this play and witness the divine Diana giving a great interpretation of the wife losing her husband to a young pretender.
Incidentally, can anyone tell me what has happened to theatre audience etiquette? It seems that every theatre perfomance I attend is disturbed by a few who must rustle sweet bags or have whispered conversations. Can they not wait until the end of a scene? I can only conclude that they think that they are at home in front of the television. - 195.93.21.70)
19 Feb 06
Excellent performances and a beautifully written script that poses many questions for married men who are or thinking of cheating on their wives.
My only query was the stage design. Perhaps, the designer can explain to me the significance of all those chairs? - 195.93.21.70)
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.