Use the form below to search for tickets on your desired date. Dates from
Synopsis Jumpers skips along at breakneck pace, as reason hovers on the edge of chaos and rules are twisted in a tale of political ambition and jumping through hoops. Can God be proved to exist? Is it possible for radical politicians to seize power without succumbing to its plumb excesses? Can anything be justified if applied logic seems to show it to be for the best? And why does an acrobat-cum-politico lie dead on the carpet?
Dates: Opens 19 June 2003. Aug 15,16,18,26,27,28, Sep 8,9, Oct 10,11,13,14,15,16,20,21,22,23,24,25,27,28,29,30,31 Nov 1,3,4,5,6,7 at 19:45. Aug 16,28, Sep 9, Oct 11,15,22,25,29, Nov 1,4,6, Mats 14:30
If Jerry Springer - The Opera that recently transferred from the National to the West End drags the commercial theatre kicking and screaming into the language of the gutter, a revival of Tom Stoppard's philosophical vaudeville Jumpers leaps to a more elevated place as it makes a similar journey across the river. In the process, it raises the game and tone entirely of Shaftesbury Avenue and its environs.
Like Jerry Springer, this isn't necessarily for everyone, but for those who crave an audacious and intricate play of verbal as well as physical gymnastics, it's just the ticket.
Seeing David Leveaux's production for a second time - with only one major cast change that has Nicky Henson replacing Jonathan Hyde as the university vice-chancellor with more than a passing interest in his philosophy professor's wife - one marvels anew at the dexterity of both the writing and the performances.
While Simon Russell Beale is born to play the forever doubting but brilliant George, Essie Davis absolutely stuns, whether singing songs on a crescent moon or nakedly fetching on her bed.
NOTE: The following review dates from June 2003 and this production's original run at the NT Lyttelton. For current casting information, see the show listings.
Even as Nicholas Hytner's new regime at the Royal National Theatre is blazing vivid trails for new work, it's intriguing to notice that two out of the first six shows that have now opened actually re-visit past National Theatre hits, originally produced a year apart in the early 70s.
First there was the legendary 1971 production of The Front Page, which has just returned in the re-worked shape of a stage adaptation of the film His Girl Friday that also derived from that classic 1920s Broadway comedy. Now we have Tom Stoppard's Jumpers that originally premiered at the National in 1972, when it also still based at the Old Vic, before being revived in 1976 as one of the first productions in the then new theatre on the South Bank.
The play was an instant contemporary classic, though it has only had one commercial London revival since, when its original director Peter Wood returned to it for a West End production at the Aldwych in 1985, starring the late Paul Eddington and Felicity Kendal. So its reappraisal is long overdue, especially one seen through the new directorial eyes of David Leveaux and offered as a vehicle for the gifted Simon Russell Beale to make another of his distinctive marks with.
He plays George Moore, a professor of moral philosophy who, in the midst of trying to write a lecture, has to contend with interruptions from a woman on the verge of a nervous breakdown (his wife Dottie, a former musical comedy actress), the presence of a corpse in the cupboard (McFee, one of the university's gymnast philosophy team), all the while searching for a missing hare, Thumper.
The dazzling, sometimes dizzying, intellectual comedy that emerges is a play of both verbal and physical gymnastics, with Stoppard harnessing what have now become his familiar comical delight in wordplay and debate to a farcical plot from which a flurry of unruly ideas and arguments erupt. The audacity of the concept - with a team of ten tumblers turning the play into a circus, while Dotty's routines turn it into a musical at other times - is amazing, but also frequently perplexing.
What exactly does all of this mean? It's probably best not to ask, but simply to allow the playful agility of the writing sweep over you. And Leveaux's production - though somewhat clunkily designed by Vicki Mortimer to move on a revolve from George's study to Dotty's bedroom - just about keeps up with it, even if you don't always.
Russell Beale is, as ever, compulsively watchable as he tangles himself in ever-more convoluted theories; but it's Australian actress Essie Davis who steals the show as his troubled wife, in variously undressed splendour and more uncertain musical pitch.
I posted before, on 29 July, so maybe I should not be posting again. I'm sad that people have averaged three stars for this play, because it is so marvelous. It's not a play that most people would give five stars to if they just walked in off the street without any preparation. It's tremendously rewarding if one has read about it beforehand. Beale's character "George" is irresistible, and his delivery of George's complicated lines stunned me (happily), even though I had read the play. I'll cross the Atlantic in December to see this play five more times; that's how much I enjoyed it. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (67.31.35.106)
12 Sep 03
Very disappointing. If you are going I suggest you read the play first. I wish I had as I found it very difficult to keep up with the speed of the dialogue. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (194.216.55.200)
28 Aug 03
I was quite disappointed, it made me feel pretty stupid as I find it very hard to follow some of the verbose philosphical ambles, Russell Beale was fat sweaty and intelligent as usual and Essie Davies disappointing compares to herturn in Streetcar named desire. Hard work not in a good way either - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.35.62.168)
27 Aug 03
Great play, great performances, mediocre production. This play is extremely odd and obscure but hilariously funny and touching at the same time, only Stoppard could pull that off. Yes the play is intellectual but it is not hard to understand at all, in fact after reading some reviews I was prepared to not understand half of it and actually I understood all of it. The performances are very high quality. Russel Beale is fantas tic as the profeser and again shows himself to be one of our best actors today. He is an extremely intelligent actor who has alot of charisma and skill and a wonderful voice. Jonathon Hyde and Nicholas Woodsen are also extremely good, Woodsen is completely at home playing the farcical comic character and Hyde is the best actor I have seen on stage and screen that can pull off a suave aristocrat. Essie Davies is not so good, I found her performance weak and irratating and she does not engage with the character. Leveauxs production although skilled in gmmickary, is not very satisfing. He does not use the Lyttelton space well only using the dront and it went at quite a slow pace. I can understand why Hytner wanted to bring in this early Stoppard classic, but I have seen four of the new regimes productions and they are all good but this is the weakest. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.225.204.205)
03 Aug 03
Before I went to London to see Jumpers, I read the script and also commentary about the play. I knew that the preparation would make a huge difference in my enjoyment. I can't even begin to say how much I enjoyed this play, but I recommend reading it and reading about it first. Simon Russell Beale certainly is one of your national treasures. He is just wonderful, amazing, in this play. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (67.31.35.73)
29 Jul 03
When I first saw this play 20-odd years ago, I thought it was a load of self-indulgent tosh. I have enjoyed every other Stoppard play I have seen, almost everyone else seems to disagree with my view of Jumpers; so I decided to use the WOS offer as an opportunity to give it another go. I still think it's a load of self-indulgent tosh which even my hero Simon Russell Beale can't rescue. Given the magnificence of the rest of Mr Hytners first three months, I will forgive him his decision to revive this! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.211.109.5)
18 Jul 03
It's a wonderful production of one of Stoppard's funniest plays. And having seen the great Michael Hordern and Diana Rigg in the original production, the real revelation for me in the NT revival is how much heart it had. As in his recent revival of "The Real Thing," David Leveaux discovers that what underlies Stoppard's characters' bravado jokiness is an aching sense of loneliness and need. Brilliantly brought off in this production, spectacularly staged. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (132.162.40.214)
15 Jul 03
I went to see JUMPERS on Saturday, July 13th, at the 2:30pm performance. I was so looking forward to it, mainly because it was starring the brilliant Simon Russell Beale. Unfortuantely I found the play a massive disappointment. The play is full of words but said nothing to me. I grew very tired, very quickly, of the way Simon Russell Beale's character spoke his monologues so quickly, so quickly in fact that my brain could only just register the words let alone try to discern what their meaning was. I found it disconcerting that many in the audience were hooting with laughter at almost everything he said. I consider myself a reasonably intelligent man, but I must admit I had great trouble following his endless monologues. It left me feeling like I just wasn't clever enough to understand it all. This isn't how I like to feel at the theatre.
I did enjoy Nicholas Woodeson as the Police Inspector - at last a character who wasn't desperately trying to show us how clever he was. He was great to watch, especially his facial expressions. The other actor who I was impressed with was John Rogan as Crouch, who although he was barely in the play, created a big impression and was a joy to watch perform. The play ended very abruptly, which I found annoying. I had assumed the play would have reached a more satisfying conclusion. It just ended and I went home very disappointed. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (158.152.89.186)
13 Jul 03
Agree with much said here, especially the complaints! It seems audiences will forgive a lot if they have a few laughs, and here the laughs are well signposted and nudged even if they are only surface glitter on a very dull play. Mr Stoppard likes us to know that he knows more about everything than we do, but I wish he would spend more time illuminating his themes and less time decorating them with trivia. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.43.172.252)
04 Jul 03
hadn't seen this play before so I didn't know what to expect. It was a great night out though.
Stoppard's wordplay can be rather dazzling but he certainly writes excellent jokes - the 'cry for help' gag is one of the funniest I've heard all year. What struck me most was how Orton-like the play was; it seems the sort of thing that Joe would have written - if he'd had an Oxbridge education. That's not meant as a putdown by the way, I think that one of the weaknesses of the play is that Stoppard's instincts are to show off, whereas Orton's are to be funny.
But you certainly don't have to be a philosophy don to enjoy this play - sit back and luxuriate in the quality of Simon Russell Beale's perfomance: he really is one of our national treasures.
Jonathan Hyde was also excellent. I felt that Essie Davis was too weak for the part of Dottie - she was good in the musical numbers but seemed a bit lost as the mayhem erupted around her.
Still, a great revival. Perhaps it will be Travesties and Arcadia next.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.