Use the form below to search for tickets on your desired date. Dates from
Synopsis A 21st century 'remixed' version. Inspired by Puccini's La Boheme Larson's original musical updated the plot to early 1990's New York where a community of East End squatters battled to fulfil their aspirations against the reality of rent demands and AIDS. Baker's version has been pruned down to a running time of just over two hours, with some Americanisms excised and references to HIV therapies updated.
Just over ten years ago, Jonathan Larson’s Rent stormed Broadway as the best new rock musical since Hair and it’s still running there. An updated version of Puccini’s La boheme, and set in the East Village in New York around Christmas time, it captured perfectly the feverish excitement of artistic endeavour in a time of the AIDS plague.
Whereas Hair expressed its youthful enthusiasm and disaffection as a howl of protest against the war in Vietnam, Rent stays closer to home, moaning about the cost of living in a property boom and trying to make it in the Big Apple; but the musicals are essentially similar in spirit, and both have really remarkable scores, as well as dual heroes – Rent’s Roger (Luke Evans) is a Kurt Cobain-style songwriter, Mark (Oliver Thornton) a wired and eager wannabe filmmaker – in a tribal community.
The emblematic artist in the Rent in-crowd is Mimi Marquez, a junkie stripper whose tiny hand may be frozen when the snow begins to fall but whose act is hot when she lights her candle for Roger. The original New York production had a sensational Mimi in Daphne Rubin-Vega and Krysten Cummings was pretty good in London premiere, too.
There are many disappointments in this “remixed” version of the show, and the first is the underpowered Mimi of Siobhan Donaghy, who has seriously misunderstood the role. Mimi is supposed to die at the end, not in the first scene. The founding member of the Sugababes indie group sings and moves pleasantly enough, but there’s no real depth to her voice, and no tigress in her tank top.
“There’s only now, there’s only here, give in to love, or live in fear,” goes the line in the final, rousing anthem. The poignancy of Rent stemmed from the tragedy of its author’s unexpected death, of an aortic aneurism, on the night before the first Off-Broadway preview in January 1996, ten days before his 36th birthday.
William Baker’s production eradicates the realism of the urban setting in favour of antiseptic white MTV chic. Baker and his musical supervisor Steve Anderson are “the celebrated creative team behind Kylie” – pop star Kylie Minogue, that is, who graced the first night with her glittering tiny presence – and, with designer Mark Bailey, they create a Perspex and neon-lit limbo that feels like a hospital ward. So the fatalism of the piece is not conveyed in any of the performances, but on a moving newsreel on the back wall litanising famous AIDS victims such as Ian Charleson, Rock Hudson, Kenny Everett and so predictably on.
Leon Lopez is the stricken black hobo and Jay Webb his divine young drag queen Angel. But they are cheap negatives of their characters and everyone’s upstaged anyway by Denise van Outen as the hilarious lesbian performance artist Maureen, who comes on like a storm in black leathers and transparent leotard. She’s nothing to do with the show, but jolly good value.
Ironically, given the production attitude, you come away thinking that Larson’s talent has been not so much “remixed” as “detoxed”.
I went to see Rent Remixed on the 29th Jan. It was awful!!!! I love Rent and I was so disappointed, the actors where all wrong for the parts, the vocals where weak and what was with the arrangements?! The worst part was Jesse Wallace in Take me or Leave me, what was she thinking? Very poor and in a complete different key to the poor girl singing joannes part. Angel was played completely wrong aswell, he is supposed to be loved by the end but I was so glad he was gone! Very disappointed, where was all the grunge?? And did anyone notice how weird Benny was when he sang? What was with all the shaking and moving? - Katie
05 Feb 08
Saw the show on 23rd January and thought it was great. Yes I am a Rent fan anyway, and could see why it wouldn't appeal to a wide audience from a ticket sales perspective but I can't understand why it's had the slating reviews it's had. Jessie Wallace was absolutly amazing and was surpsied at the quality of her singing voice. Selfishly I hope this tours, unfortunately the ticket sales won't be great but it would be a great shame for it to close. First Class show - Rob
24 Jan 08
I loved this! I am gutted its closing on Feb 2nd but I have to say its the best stage show i have seen for years (and I have seen a few!) I loved it so much when I went last November that I have been back now 7 times! ;o)
I did not know the story before I went but now I know the songs word perfect. I loved the chemistry of the actors and the I really belived you could tell they were enjoying themselves, this reflected in this believable, stunning performances. I was so moved, esp in the final song between Roger and Mimi which literally rended me speachless through tears.
- Louise W
22 Jan 08
I knew I shouldn't have gone, but I couldn't resist. I loved Rent the first time round; it was passionate, edgy and had real heart - I went three times and have played the score continuously since. Musical theatre is very different to pop staging and I'm afraid the creative team here have turned it into a heartless and joyless pop concert. It's a shame, because there is clearly talent on the stage.....but they are directed to shout rather than sing and overact bigtime. There's no subtlety and no passion and a great score sounds simply dreadful. It is isn't a remix, it's a massacre. Save up for the airfare and head for NYC where the original is rightly still playing. - Gareth James
17 Jan 08
I'm not sure what everyone's on about here and I agree with Dave Woolrich in saying that I wouldn't have booked, based on these reviews, but thankfully, I got 2 tickets for a birthday present and went last night and it was FAB! I've got something to compare it to though - I've seen the original on Broadway, so it has an unfair advantage - but I've still given this production 4 stars. The casting was brilliant, the stage presence of all of the cast, including the ensemble, is electric and it just flowed so well. Even the stark white stage, which hits you square between the eyes when you walk in, really works very well. Even my partner followed the story, which after reading these reviews, I was worried he wouldn't, but he had absolutely no trouble understanding what was going on, so I'm not sure how people are getting lost, it's not exactly a very confusing storyline. I think everyone just needs to be watching all the goings-on on stage right from the word go so that nothing is missed, because everything that goes on, whether it be centre stage or up above the scrolling taglines, has some significance to the story. The only negative thing I have to mention is that in the second half, it seemed as if the wires had got crossed with the Tops Of The Pops studios and the first few songs are sung with a perpetual disco rock tune going in the background, which is very distracting, but thankfully, it only occurs for the 1st 20 minutes of the second half and then the soundtrack is back to normal again. DVO is absolutely fantastic as Maureen, in a very different interpretation of the character for those of you who have seen the Broadway production, but still very, very good. The audience interraction gave a refreshing comedic interlude just after interval. Every person on that stage is a star, absolutely highly recommended! - Lindsay
21 Nov 07
I'm not sure what everyone's on about here and I agree with Dave Woolrich in saying that I wouldn't have booked, based on these reviews, but thankfully, I got 2 tickets for a birthday present and went last night and it was FAB! I've got something to compare it to though - I've seen the original on Broadway, so it has an unfair advantage - but I've still given this production 4 stars. The casting was brilliant, the stage presence of all of the cast, including the ensemble, is electric and it just flowed so well. Even the stark white stage, which hits you square between the eyes when you walk in, really works very well. Even my partner followed the story, which after reading these reviews, I was worried he wouldn't, but he had absolutely no trouble understanding what was going on, so I'm not sure how people are getting lost, it's not exactly a very confusing storyline. I think everyone just needs to be watching all the goings-on on stage right from the word go so that nothing is missed, because everything that goes on, whether it be centre stage or up above the scrolling taglines, has some significance to the story. The only negative thing I have to mention is that in the second half, it seemed as if the wires had got crossed with the Tops Of The Pops studios and the first few songs are sung with a perpetual disco rock tune going in the background, which is very distracting, but thankfully, it only occurs for the 1st 20 minutes of the second half and then the soundtrack is back to normal again. DVO is absolutely fantastic as Maureen, in a very different interpretation of the character for those of you who have seen the Broadway production, but still very, very good. The audience interraction gave a refreshing comedic interlude just after interval. Every person on that stage is a star, absolutely highly recommended! - Lindsay
21 Nov 07
I really don't know why people are so negative. I saw the show for the second time on Wednesday evening and I really enjoyed it. I have been to see it before and I honestly think that the understudies did a superb job, I really do think the cast were amazing. I just think people will automatically hate this show because it's REMIXED and they won't open their minds.. U need to see past that?!? I did..
Wednesday night was great, Craig was an excellent Angel, he had feelings, moves and humour, Jamie as Benny was really great too, he has a gorgeous voice. Ruth actually brought an emotion to Mimi's character (which I didn't feel or see the last time I saw the show) and I really connected to her, and CJ as Maureen, I actually think she's better than Denise but again that is my opinion and I don't expect people to agree with me but she was very very suited to the role.
- Heidi
11 Nov 07
I have read with interest the other reviews on this site and almost didn't book because the reviews were so poor. However I'm glad I did and make no appologies for giving this 5 stars as I was entertained and moved. I booked through See-Tickets and was unable to have a reserved seat as I always like to choose from the seating plan. I ended up in row D in the stalls on the general reservation policy which was fine but I almost felt I was on stage with the cast as it was so close! The performance I viewed was on Tuesday 6th November 2007 evening. I ususally pay a lot more than £35.00 for a ticket so no complaints at all. Initially on entering the theatre I was very disappointed that DVO was not performing however, that's life. Having seen the DVD and owned the original broadway cast CD played over and over I was very much looking forward to this re-vamped show. I am no theatre critic but I comment on what I see and experience. I see a lot of West End shows frequently because it's a passion of mine. I loved the minimalistic and modern stage - like Blood Brothers 50 years later! The three understudies, I thought were excellent. Fair enough, the actor playing Mimi wasn't too powerful but isn't that the character she plays? From where I was sitting there was plenty of emotion in her performance. All the others were just great and put everything into their roles. Each one had a superb voice with what must be a very challenging score. I notice that one person commented on the fact that they could not follow the story. But, again, isn't that the case for most theatre productions, particularly musicals. Before booking I always make a point of either buying the original cast recording or DVD or both, otherwise you are listening to a load of unfamiliar songs which doesn't help in following the story. I have to admit to really liking the re-mix. As an avid Madonna fan the inclusion of "Holiday" in "New Year" was inspired (please WOS people-don't throw eggs at me!!) I was also moved by the underlying message of the story. In my profession I often come into contact with people with HIV and the section where Angel is dying in bed accompanied by the strong bass and leather clad demons, sends out a healthy message about the contraction of HIV - hopefully advising the audience to take care. I also found sections very moving, especially with names of people who passed away previously on the LED screen. I also really enjoyed the re-mix, OK it's different from the original and I really hope the cast do a CD soon. Individually they ALL have such talent. I really hope to see this again soon and would recommend it to friends or anyone visiting this site. - dave woolrich
10 Nov 07
It was truly terrible, dodgy acccents, bad casting, bring back the grunge, it fits in with the story and the updated version totally loses the atmosphere. I was there the night of the 3 understudies, Maureen was great, Mimi and Angel were absolutely terrible. Mark with his ridiculous accent was laughable. Roger was fantastic. Why on earth was 'Living in America' remixed - it DIDN'T work. The worst night of theatre I have ever experienced. This production should not be playing in the West End - it is nowhere near up to standard. - Karen
10 Nov 07
I went to see Rent on the night of the 3 understudies and from what I hear it couldn't have made the production worse. I have never seen the original and it started to infuriate me that it was assumed you'd seen it. I had to rely on my friend to explain what was MEANT to be happening to piece together the storyline... otherwise I would have had no idea that Mimi and Roger were together! One minute they're flirting over a candle and the next they're both singing an angst-ridden song about their love and secrets.
Back to the understudies - Mimi was pretty but as I've already said pretty pointless. Maureen did her best but it would have been interesting to see how differently DVO played it. Angel I did like and his relationship with Collins was the one thing that kept me going. On the subject of Collins it did seem a bit odd that he was meant to be a teacher, as someone else has described he looks like a hobo!
The english/american accent saga did confuse me because many people sang in american but then spoke in english with a touch of american thrown in for good measure. All except for Mark who just stuck out like a sore thumb and I found it hard to believe that Maureen would EVER get with him.
On the whole the only thing that truly impressed me about my evening was how eager and willing to answer questions the cast were in the WOS Q&A session afterwards. It was a joy to listen to them and their enthusiasm and I felt sorry for them knowing they're probably going to be unemployed soon. - Clare
Opened 10 Sep 1892 as the Trafalgar Square Theatre,name changed in 1895. Major refurbishment 79/80. Taken over by the Royal Court during their two year refurbishment starting in 1996, called the Royal Court downstairs. 650 seats. Society of London Theatre member. An [ATG] member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.