Use the form below to search for tickets on your desired date. Dates from
Synopsis The Lover was initially written by Pinter as a television play and was broadcast in 1963 but was quickly moved to the stage in September of the same year in a production directed by the author. A commuter heads to the city from Windsor every morning and heads home every night. However, the illusion of respectability is shattered when his wife calmly tells him about the wild lover she entertains in the afternoons. One of Pinter's most direct exercises, the play is a darkly comic tale of the necessity and danger of fantasy. Double bill with The Collection
The last time these two short early plays of Harold Pinter were seen in London, they were presented on a triple bill at the Donmar Warehouse with a third item, A Kind of Alaska, which placed the brutal comedy and blatant sexiness of The Lover and The Collection into sharper relief.
On their own, the two plays, even in this fine production by Jamie Lloyd, betray their origins as television pieces. In The Lover, the time jumps in the narrative of a married couple spicing up their relationship with erotic “let’s pretend” are not really effective as a theatrical device, while The Collection does not gain from its rapid switch of locations behind a proscenium arch.
Still, Lloyd’s direction smoothes over the bumps with considerable finesse and never misses a beat in its musical delivery of the texts. And in Gina McKee, Pinter has an ideal performer in her qualities of physical slinkiness and teasing, enigmatic thoughtfulness. In each play, she conveys an almost miraculous ability to stand aside from herself in another role: in The Lover, as a different kind of wife, in The Collection as a different kind of person.
The Lover is about role-playing, The Collection about versions of the truth driven by the need to know too much. The second play has a deeper charge and mystery about it: in trying to ascertain what might have happened in a Leeds hotel room on trip to a fashion show, the characters reveal their emotional frailties and strengths.
None more so than Timothy West as Harry, whose possessiveness pushes him further into the life of his younger flat-mate Bill (Charlie Cox) than is good for his sanity. There is a brisk edginess about West that eliminates any sense of impropriety even as he itemises Bill’s “slum sense of humour” in the great speech about his partner’s unreliability.
The explanation seems to satisfy James (Richard Coyle) whose own line of enquiry throws up details of room numbers and pyjama styles that suggest he is either making them up or taking them on trust from his wife in another conversation completely. The beauty of the writing is that you never feel let down by its evasion or ambiguity; the style is absolutely concrete, the switches between fantasy and conviction utterly persuasive.
Soutra Gilmour’s design and Jon Clark’s lighting create the right sort of slightly unreal atmosphere for both plays which, for all their shortcomings as theatre pieces, still proclaim the originality and slyness of a master dramatist at the start of his career.
God oh God!! Let me say I am a big fan of Harold Pinter, I am firm in the belief that he is possibly the greatest living playwright. This production of his brilliant short plays was slow, labourius and definately not worth the price of the ticket. Richard Coyle seemed uncomfortable and had a very dodgy posh accent. Maybe I saw an off night but I saw no chemistry in the Lover and the Collection, which isnt a long play, seemed like it lasted two hours. Dull. - James
10 Apr 08
Great performances from Richard Coyle and Tim West, otherwise..... - Joesmith
07 Feb 08
Have to say I agree with KJC. I love Pinters work but its the writing that takes the audience on a strange and often very funny journey. RDS believes that Coyles "staccato Pinteresque sound" is the proper way to interpret the text.
I found it excluded any chance of us hearing a conversation between the characters and therefore left me cold. It’s a shame as the rest of the cast were playing it straight rather than Coyles attempt to artificially create an atmosphere. In the end Pinter writes plays he wants people to see and enjoy not revere as some mysterious artwork.
- LCA
30 Jan 08
I think KJC misses the point I loved the monotony of Richard Coyle's delivery, that stacato, Pinteresque sound. I have already said something about these plays under "The Collection" listing so I'll keep this brief. Pinter is as surreal with words as Dali was with paints. Where Dali twisted reality through oils on canvass Pinter does it with sounds on stage - he's far more satisfying seen than read. One either loves or hates him. He makes us, the audience, work at it and that's where some find it hard to cope. Having to think when all we want to do is sit back and be entertained! Well, fair enough, but sometimes it is wonderfull to make that effort, even if we're none the wiser at the end, the journey can be a very enjoyable one. - rds
29 Jan 08
I made a New Year resolution to see no more Pinter. 21 days later, someone offered me a free ticket, so I broke it. I wish I hadn't. - GarGar
24 Jan 08
Neither of these plays represent Pinter's best works, or anything near it. Both were originally written specifically as television screenplays, which later transferred to stage, and this is evident from the number of brief scenes, some with little or no dialogue, and the episodic nature of the narrative (originally accomodating commercial breaks.)
That said, there should be enough entertainment, and laughs, in both pieces (each concerning the issue of adultary) to provide a full evening.
Whilst this double bill benefits from exceptional design by Soutra Gilmour and some extraordinarily effective lighting (by Jon Clark) and music (by Ben and Max Ringham) what really lets it down is the central, one-note performance by Richard Coyle in both plays. Each and every line is delivered with the same clinical monotone, with scant regard for the performances of the other actors or the nature of the text itself. There is no reaction to anything with which is presented - it appears to be more a premeditated line-reading than a performance. It is particularly galling that once the evening moves on to the second play, "The Collection", Coyle delivers exactly the same performance as he did in "The Lover", seeming to believe that the spectacles he has accquired in the interval will provide distinction enough between his roles.
Which is a great shame, because in "The Lover", Gina McKee struggles gamely to do the work of two actors, and "The Collection" boasts a superb masterclass in how it SHOULD be done by the exemplary Timothy West, supported by a very fine performance by relative newcomer, Charlie Cox. - KJC
Opened 15 Oct 1881, designed by Thomas Verity and originally gas lit. 780 seats. An Ambassadors theatre since 2000 and renamed The Harold Pinter Theatre in September 2011 in recognition of the wide range of Pinter's plays that the theatre has hosted.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.