Synopsis An English and an American couple embark on an enchanted friendship after a chance meeting in a restaurant New York. They share a sense of humour, similar interests and even teenage children - but are any of them speaking the same language? The buffer zone between friendship and enmity proves fertile ground for this witty dissection of a special relationship.
It was George Bernard Shaw who said "England and America are two countries divided by a common language", and lyricist Ira Gershwin who once wittily catalogued the linguistic differences - "You say eether and I say eyether/You say neether and I say nyther;/Eether, eyether, neether, nyther -/Let's call the whole thing off!"
Now, in a new play called US and THEM, playwright Tamsin Oglesby has lengthily dramatised the story of two 40-something couples from either side of the Atlantic who at the start of the play decide to follow Gershwin's advice and call the whole thing off. It then rewinds from that moment to chart how they fell in with each other after a chance meeting in a New York restaurant, and how they eventually fall out in a mire of missed business opportunities and an apparently shared family tree that's supposed to connect them turns out to make them not as close as they think they are.
Oglesby's overwritten play - it runs to 19 scenes in two acts - often wittily but sometimes too obviously observes the cultural and philosophical mismatches between them, from the way to deal with verrucas and problems in restaurants, to the bigger differences that ultimately tear them apart as mutual incomprehension about what's important simmers into outright contempt.
Ogsleby marshals a wonderfully antagonistic penultimate scene that fiercely provides arguments for both sides, though an inevitably partisan British audience showed its true colours when it applauded lines against the Americans. At a time when our respective leaders are fond of citing the 'special relationship' that exists between our two nations, this play provides a contemporary riposte that is full delicious insults. As the American Ed tells the British Martin, "Don't talk to me about laws and systems with your highest crime rate in Europe and your collapsing infrastructure and your rude, incompetent, ugly people and your arse-licking prime minister… You can't even run your own country. You have a Scotsman in charge, you get an American to fix your Underground, a Swede to manage your soccer team…."
But then Martin replies, "At least we have society. Your country is held together by nothing but a whining ego. And at least we elected our arse-licking prime minister. Our country is run by its democratically elected representatives. Not some illiterate trigger-happy ex-alcoholic who can barely speak English…. And licking arse is better than kicking it."
The scene, though brilliantly executed, is a long time coming. And if the writing that precedes it is sometimes derivative, the staging is even more so. You don't need to know that director Jennie Darnell was associate director for Yasmina Reza's Art and Life x 3 to spot the staging similarities to Matthew Warchus' productions of those plays, with jangly electronic music punctuating the scenes changes and fluorescent light frames around the proscenium.
But Darnell is at least beautifully served by her strong cast that includes Hugh Bonneville and the wonderful Siobhan Redmond as the English couple and Matthew Marsh and Harriet Walter as the Americans, with Jemima Rooper and Jonah Y Lotan as their respective kids who find their own way to each other even as they are cutting themselves off from their parents.
I though playing out the 'special relationship' in this way was rather clever and very thought-provoking. Well acted and very well staged, it might not be great, but it's certainly a cut above many new plays - and it fits the new Hampstead like a glove. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.211.102.76)
24 Jun 03
I thought that this was a great and enjoyable piece of writing. The characters were excellent and humorous, the scenes were always funny, sometimes laugh out loud so. However there were too many obvious moments where the characters go over the top sometimes looking as if they were from dead ringers and it was far too long, some of the many scenes although funny were unnescesary. However the acting was excellent, with great characters on show from Bonneville, Walter and Redmond. The best performance came from Matthew Marsh as the New York Buisnessman. He is comppletely brilliant with a superb American accent, the stage is the most alive when Marsh is on. The direction is very caring, Topper clearly getting the best out of her actors and the minimalist set was very good.It has its faults but do not be put off this is an excellent play dealing with how we see the Americans and vice versa and does not deserve the bad reviews it has got. The new theatre is amazing and support it by seeing this great show.
- USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.225.204.223)
22 Jun 03
My partner and I approached this play with trepidation; we left feeling depressed - "a bad taste in the mouth", she said. This is quite something: we're long-time regular theatre-goers, and I don't recall coming out of a show - ever - feeling depressed.
The reason for the trepidation? We're an anglo-American couple. I'm from here, she's from New York. I lived over there for eight years; she's lived here for the same.
What was the play intended to be (if not merely opportunistic) - a comedy of transatlantic manners, comparative social criticism, political polemic? Had it been any one of these there might have been some point. What it really seemed to be was a rag-bag sitcom of out-of-date stereotypes and prejudices, with a new-age youth-culture gloss for added meaning (the kids, whose parents naturally don't get it, form a deep mutual understanding while back-packing the world and making zone-out music).
My partner insisted that the characters, especially the Americans, weren't "real". True enough - just compare the flimsy types in this play with the characters in any US TV show, from ER to Curb Your Enthusiasm.
The British characters seem to be living in the 1970’s.
(The actors, by the way, are great.)
The only structure in the play comes from two conveniently symmetrical disillusionments: the Brit inventor has his (ludicrous) sheep-mower ripped off; the Yank genealogy nut finds out her supposed relative was adopted. Neat. The rest is sketches and one-liners.
The climax – which the Daily Telegraph, revealingly, seems to enjoy so much – is simply a ping-pong of bar-room xenophobia. At this point you feel the play falling apart in front of you. Some in the audience laugh, nervously; the rest cringe.
In the end, the author has her cake and eats it, too: the parents bust up but the kids get it together. Very balanced. (At least with Harold Pinter you know where the author stands.) Presumably this means there's hope for the future. The "why/why not" skit at the very end sums up the message. But this is just another snatch from the grab-bag of Brit-Yank cliché.
What’s so depressing is that at least one person – the author (one hates to think how many others) – apparently thinks this play says something true about how British and American people interact.
As my partner said (pace Elaine): “Fake, fake, fake.”
- USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.155.17.25)
14 Jun 03
This play, with a cast that any theatre would die for, lets it's self and us down in the end.
The split in the last scene between the US and UK couple is such a shouting/angry mess with every US/Brit theme thrown in it ruins a rather good play about the two.
A cheap last 'upset' around the couples children also does not ring true. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.13.129.151)
11 Jun 03
I disagree completely with the previous reviewer. First, this production offers marvellous acting - all the performances are flawless. Second, the play is a very impressive analysis of a relationship which is crucial to all our lives - that between America and the UK - and the central scene in which the American and English characters contains many truths which we should all be prepared to acknowledge. Third, the writer deals with a post-September 11 world not by hammering us over the head with the changes that have come about but by deftly introducing what is new as a result of that traumatic event. This is very good writing indeed matched by equally good acting. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.50.14)
31 May 03
I was looking forward to seeing this play at the lovely new Hampstead Theatre. Well unfortunately the writing fell far short of good.
The first act was a transatlantic old-fashioned comedy of manners, very clichéd even down to the teenager in his bedroom on the computer all day. It was mildly amusing and I did laugh on several occasions. The acting was fine (in the pedestrian sense of the word), in fact Hugh Bonneville was better than expected! I did however get ever so slightly tired at laughing at silly accents, mildly embarrassing social situations and the word sex coming from a fifty something New Yorker (in comparison to an array of things).
The second act however drained all the amusement from me until the hysterical (in the frantic sense of the word) penultimate scene. The play tried to become serious and give us an insight into the characters feelings; too little too late. The ludicrous English Country stereotype two of the characters had become was just not right for the play.
The penultimate scene became funny for a few moments, but it was over long and as I said before hysterical. The final flaccid scene was the only reason I saw for having the puddle deep characters of the respective (US and UK) couples children, throughout the rest of the play .
All in all a very disappointing case, shame on you Tamsin Oglesby (next time drop the English people who know the order of precedence), and I suppose a lukewarm well done to the Director Jennie Darnell who did the best of a bad job (the revolve was used quite nicely at times). A very turgid evening out. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.35.56.7)
Eton Avenue Swiss Cottage Inner London London NW3 3EU
Telephone
020 7722 9301
Station
Swiss Cottage (LT)
Description
[TMA] member. Housed for 40 years in a 'temporary' prefab. In 1999, the Arts Council of England awarded the theatre a National Lottery grant of £9.86 million to fund a new building. The new Hamstead Theatre opened in 2003. The Hampstead Downstairs is a studio space dedicated to new writing.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.