Synopsis Design for Living follows the fortunes of Gilda, Otto and Leo, a trio of decadent 30-something artists who travel from Paris to London to New York as their fame increases. The complex and revolving relationships between the three conclude themselves in a highly provocative manner, flying in the face of convention and their public profile. The notion of a ménage a trois, shocking in 1932 when the play was written is still provocative today and Coward's play has much to tell us about celebrity status, sexual mores and the nature of fidelity. Artistic Director Marianne Elliott has decided to set the play in a contemporary setting. The production replaces Sex, Chips and Rock 'n' Roll. Tickets held for Sex, Chips and Rock 'n' Roll will be valid for the same seats for the same dates for Design for Living. Alternatively tickets can be exchanged for a future production or a refund at the Theatre Box Office. The Theatre
Updating a classic to a contemporary setting is always a challenge. Noel Coward's tale of a bisexual ménage à trois, replete with the bite of his trademark cock a snook at social mores, shocked audiences in the 1930s. But as it unfolds in 21st-century fashion in this new Royal Exchange production (the last in the theatre's 25th anniversary season), it becomes clear that simply adding modern references and nudity in place of the original ingredients is not wholly successful.
Marianne Elliot's version follows three central characters - artist Otto (Oilver Milburn), successful playwright Leo (Clarence Smith) and society decorator Gilda (Victoria Scarborough) - who simply cannot live a day without each other. When Gilda and Leo first form an attachment as a couple, Otto is left full of anguish. But his return to both of their lives is inevitable, as is the unconventional - and increasingly entangled - relationship that develops from there.
What makes Design for Living interesting is the characters' sheer desperation - they will cross hell and high water to be together. And while, both 70 years ago and today, we may be accustomed to seeing this transpire between a couple, it provides a real conflict of interests, emotions and social expectations when the "three's a crowd" mentality holds such sway.
Unfortunately, curiosity is not enough to hold the audience's attention here. Nor is Elliot's glossily stylish direction. Aside from any weaknesses in the material, the main fault of the production is one of miscasting.
As the axis of attention and attraction, a woman who two men will give up everything for, the social-climbing Gilda needs to be a strong but enigmatic presence. But Victoria Scarborough never manages to find her character's mysterious edge. Instead, she resorts to volume, particularly in the first act when she spends most of her time shouting her lines rather than seducing her companions. The two male leads acquit themselves well, but because we can never believe they could really desire such a woman, there's ultimately little for them to hook into.
The acting and the direction play a poor second to Lez Brotherston's amazing set. From the functional Parisian abode to the dazzling but ultimately empty New York apartment, each backdrop underscores Gilda's out-of-control lifestyle.
The modern setting clashed horribly with the dialogue and the acting was way over the top. The comedy cleaner was simply offensive. There was nothing of interest in this production. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
15 Jul 02
Interesting play but such a bad production of it. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
08 Jul 02
Largely agree with Glenns (WOS) review - the 'updating' is very sloppily done - most unlike Marianne Elliots usually 1st class direction. For example why leave in references to crossing the Atlantic on the Mauritania? Why does the maid not take the cordless phone with her instead of running back all the time?
Unusually for the Exchange there are a couple of really weak performances which undermine the whole play.
The real issue I have is the set which, as Glenn says, looks stunning but in an region where theatres are threatened with closure the RoyEx seems to require its subsidy trimming. It is obscenely opulent(a crew of approx 12 are needed to change it), needlessly detailed (why lay an intrictate floor for act 2 then cover it with a carpet?). A real example here of less being better than more.
One of this excellent theatres poorer offerings. - USER: Whatsonstage.com
St Ann's Square Manchester Greater Manchester M2 7DH
Telephone
0161 833 9833
Station
Description
Closed by Manchester bombing 1996. Reopened Dec 1998 with a new 120 seat studio space added. Seats 750. Founding sponsor of The Studio - Selfridges and Co.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.