Synopsis Prospero, Duke of Milan, his dukedom usurped by his brother Antonio, is put to sea with his daughter Miranda and some magical books smuggled in by his loyal councillor Gonzalo. The sea casts them up on an island where Prospero, exercising his magical powers, makes a home for himself and Miranda. One day a great storm, which Prospero has conjured, breaks up a passing ship and delivers to him the members of his usurping court. Treacherous brother, fellow conspirators and old friend alike come under Prospero's spell. Shakespeare's last play. All the characters are played by three actors and enhanced by three dancers and six musicians.
At first sight, this Tempest bears some superficial resemblance to a cut-down production of Cymbeline that Mike Alfreds directed at the Globe in 2001. In that production, six actors played all the parts and the simplicity of the staging brought that most difficult play to life.
This time round, there are just three actors, three dancers and a small choir to tell the story. Director Tim Carroll explains that the use of the two trios of performers emphasise the importance of trinities within the play. In addition, Ariel and Caliban represent two sides of Prospero: the spiritual and the earthy. Such an interpretation, however, leaves little room for exploration of the themes of colonisation and conquest. And the idea of Caliban as some malevolent, dark force is a particularly old-fashioned view - most modern audiences sympathise with his desire for freedom.
Tellingly, in his programme notes, Carroll explains how he was taken by the idea of doing The Tempest as a three-hander because it’s a play he “knows inside out”. The resulting production is really for theatregoers who already know the play extremely well too. There are times when the action is particularly confusing, especially in the scenes involving Sebastion, Antonio, Alonso and Gonzalo where three actors have to play four characters (five when Ariel interrupts the feast). It reminded me of that problem of how many colours are needed in maps to ensure that the same colour is never touching.
It doesn’t help matters that the programme’s synopsis of the plot doesn’t even mention Antonio’s usurpation but implies that Prospero’s dukedom was taken over by the King of Naples.
There are times, however, when the approach works well. The opening scene with Prospero using a chessboard to show the effects of the tempest and its effects on the characters is effective. Prospero’s use of different voices emphasises the confusion and makes it clear from the outset what powerful magical forces are at play. The masque for Miranda and Ferdinand is also excellently done, but then, you’d expect that a production based on words, music and dance would flourish here.
The three actors - [Mark Rylance[, Alex Hassell and Edward Hogg - work hard to manage all the parts between them. And, to their immense credit, the two younger actors are not overshadowed by the Globe’s artistic director (something that hasn’t always been the case at this theatre).
Full marks to The Globe for trying something new. It would have been easy to feed audiences a hackneyed version of Shakespeare knowing the crowds would keep coming. Such commitment to experimentation is something the incoming artistic director would do well to continue. Nevertheless, as mentioned above, this pared-down The Tempest is probably best appreciated by those already in the know. I’m not sure the casual theatregoer would really understand everything that’s going on.
Dreadful! Really dreadful. Confusing even to someone who is familiar with the play. Extremely irritating to be fobbed off with three actors and three dancers whose relevance escaped me entirely. Mark Rylance is extremely talented but his rather whiny delivery is entirely unsuitable for the powerful and sinister figure of Prospero. Having said that the audience cheered the perfomance with wild enthusiasm - so presumably they were all intimately knowledgeable about the text and had no difficulty in sorting out the characters. Well, bully for them. - 81.79.247.206)
24 Sep 05
Brilliant but it's best when you are familiar with the text. Alex Hassell is so hot! I'm finding it very difficult to write essays about the hideous monster Caliban as he was played by such an attractive, god-like man. - 195.93.21.102)
19 Sep 05
If I could give no stars, I would. I was so disappointed by this production, which is self-indulgant, incoherent and difficult to follow. The reaction of the people I have spoken to after seeing it, has been mixed and I am feeling like the little boy who pointed out the "emperor's new clothes" I saw the first preview and gather it is much clearer to follow now and that it becomes more enjoyable on repeat viewings. However the majority of visitors to the Globe will see it just once and I do think many members of the audience will leave the theatre bemused and confused. The highly detailed symbolism is far too detailed to be taken in on one viewing and the director's and company's assumption that someone new to the play will understand and appreciate all that is going on (and there is far too much going on!) is in my view, quite wrong.
The three actors performances' are not as clearly defined as the main Whatsonstage review suggests. Indeed particularly at the outset when Mark Rylance plays with the chessboard and chess pieces and puts on silly voices to represent the characters, and in Antonio's & Sebastian plotting scene and the conclusion, the spectacle of Mark talking to himself was just plain silly. This production is allieviated just(!) by the scenes with Caliban, Trincolo and Stephano, but it too is spoilt by a lack of change of tone or voice in Ed Hogg's performance both as as Trincolo and Ariel's interuptions.
The three dancers, dressed for some reason as refugees from Bananarama (as one friend described them) are distracting and inexplicable and singers though sounding lovely are also from another production entirely!! As an experimental production that would amuse and cause an interested and informed response at the Edinburgh Festival, it works fine - at the Globe it causes confusion and puzzlement.
That this production materialises from the same talented team that presented the stunning Twelfth Night and Richard II confounds! Obviously the Globe can't continously perfom "traditional" or "original practices" productions and should expand and challenge, emotionally and intellectually, but this dire display was simply embarrassing! - 213.38.153.28)
19 May 05
this play shows off the amazing talent of Mark Rylance and has some genuinely hilarious scenes in it. the doubling up of actors can make the story a little hard to follow, but not to the point where you become bored or completely lost. - 84.68.122.138)
A rebuild of Shakespeare's original Globe theatre close to the original site. Society of London Theatre member. Note: Booking opened March 3rd 1996. Tickets for performances range from £5 (standing in the yard) to £37.50 for the best gallery seats). Induction loop facilities. Wheelchair facilities. Extensive education programme. Restaurant, cafe and bar. Dark during the winter but the museum and venue remain open. One of the few London venues with Sunday performances. The Globe Theatre Season runs from April to October. The Globe Education Centre is located in Park Street and runs an educational autumn season.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.