Use the form below to search for tickets on your desired date. Dates from
Synopsis Classic comedy of bad manners about a flamboyant family. The characters of Judith and David Bliss were based on real life friends of the playwright, American actress Laurette Taylor and her husband Hartley Manners. The eccentric couple were renowned for their table manners, surprised guests would often endure shrill arguments - waged entirely among the family - which often ended with them storming out of the room, leaving their bewildered guests to make what they could of the rest of the evening. Gala evening - April 25th, all proceeds to support The Masterclass Trust. £75-£225 upper price includes post show dinner
A slightly shaky start to this limited season of the Judi Dench-headed revival of Noel Coward’s Hay Fever – with a rescheduled press night (due to a clash with the RSC) and cancelled previews (because of the leading lady’s case of the flu) – did nothing to diminish the impact when it opened last night (20 April 2006) at the West End’s Theatre Royal Haymarket.
While not all the critics were impressed with some other aspects of Peter Hall’s production, none disputed the brilliance of its leading lady, who plays bohemian actress Judith Bliss, who has retreated to a rural haven where her writer husband David (Peter Bowles) and their precocious son and daughter all invite unsuspecting guests down for a madcap weekend of game-playing. And, with Dench at the top of her form, more than a few were critics deemed this Hay Fever a smash hit.
First performed in 1925, Noel Coward’s comedy of manners was inspired by the eccentric American actress Laurette Taylor, and her husband Hartley, and written by Coward in just three days. Dench and Bowles are joined in the cast by Kim Medcalf, Dan Stevens, Belinda Lang, William Chubb, Charles Edwards, Lin Blakley and Olivia Darnley. The production is presented by Bill Kenwright and continues until 5 August 2006.
Michael Coveney on Whatsonstage.com - None of a string of adjectives “would be sufficient to describe the glorious performance of Judi Dench as Judith Bliss…. Dame Judi takes the role by the scruff of the neck and shakes it into a sort of hectic vivacity, displaying the monstrosity of her ego with a speed and gravity, ensuring the play bristles with laughter…. No Judith Bliss before has been so ruthlessly hilarious – Dench’s dottiness and distraction are resonant and highly developed mannerisms, not signs of character weakness.” If for no other reason, Coveney declares, the production “must be seen for the brilliance and no-nonsense artistry of its leading lady, our delightful dame of the calceolarias.”
Charles Spencer in the Daily Telegraph - “Judi Dench is in her element, and clearly having a ball …. Dench gives a masterclass in high-definition comic acting, making Judith Bliss at once preposterous and curiously loveable.” Spencer was also won over by Hall’s “loving”, “near perfect” production of Coward’s “comic masterpiece”. He concluded: “This is a night of English high comedy at its absolute best – and a smash hit if I ever saw one.”
Quentin Letts in the Daily Mail - “Dame Judi Dench may look a little ancient for the role – she is a cross between the late Queen Mother and Bette Davis – but she brings kitten touches to the production.” But, in his five-star rave, Letts praised all aspects of Hall’s “classic” production, “directed down to the inch”, and Coward’s comedy. “Hay Fever may be impossibly silly and dated, but its squeezebox crescendos of farce remain irresistible….” His recommendation was to firmly ignore medical wisdom: “Hay Fever? Ignore doctors’ advice. Catch it if you possibly can.”
Nicholas de Jongh in the Evening Standard - While De Jongh notes that “Dame Judi, such a downright, truthful performer, is not ideally suited to the camp affectations and artificialities of the role”, he decided that she nevertheless “expertly conveys Judith’s gorgeous absurdity”. What’s more, overall, Coward’s 80-year-old comedy makes “a fresh, blissful impression” in Hall’s “spirited production”. “Hay Fever provides pure, delectable fun for escapists from life’s problems and pressures…. A hit? Yes, and a smashing one.”
Michael Billington in the Guardian - “It really is an evening for Dench-watchers; and what is fascinating is how she triumphs in a role that goes against the grain of her natural talent…. Dench may not be the kind of actory actor Coward envisaged. But that makes it all the funnier…. She never lets you forget that Judith’s real home is the dressing room and that her theatrical instinct is at war with her social role.”
Paul Taylor in the Independent - “Dench’s Judith veers hilariously between striking attitudes and spouting prefabricated sentiments… and sudden rapid, pettish concessions to reality. It’s the seamless, brilliantly timed way in which she (Dench) slides from the semi-rehearsed to the grudgingly spontaneous that makes her performance so funny.” The revival, writes Taylor, is “a Hay Fever that is not to be sneezed at.”
Noel Coward had just made his first real breakthrough – playing drug-addled bad boy Nicky Lancaster in The Vortex in 1924 – when this delightful comedy of weekend guests and bad manners, Hay Fever opened to notices which referred to the play variously as being “dull, amusing, thin, slight, tedious, witty and brittle”.
All of these epithets could be fairly applied to Peter Hall’s revival depending on your mood or disposition. But none of them would be sufficient to describe the glorious performance of Judi Dench as Judith Bliss, the retired actress who distils each moment of everyday social life into its theatrical possibility. Dame Judi takes the role by the scruff of the neck and shakes it into a sort of hectic vivacity, displaying the monstrosity of her ego with a speed and gravity, ensuring the play bristles with laughter.
Judith and her philandering husband, David (a suave, perfectly attired Peter Bowles), and their two spoilt children, Sorel and Simon (a beefy Kim Medcalf and a quivering Dan Stevens), have each invited a separate guest as a lamb for the slaughter. These hapless outsiders are ignored, insulted, humiliated in charades and finally abandoned. The genius of the play lies in its self-conscious theatricality, so that when Judith evokes the “thrill of a first night” with the critics “all leaning forward with glowing faces, receptive and exultant” she is both dramatising herself and commenting – acidly – on the result.
Dench steps downstage at such points and wrestles the play to the ground almost savagely. No Judith Bliss before has been so ruthlessly hilarious – Dench’s dottiness and distraction are resonant and highly developed mannerisms, not signs of character weakness.
Otherwise, the production, unexceptionally designed by Simon Higlett, is straightforward, with some astute, frenetic acting from Charles Edwards as the besotted Sandy Tyrell and a nice line in befuddled dignity from William Chubb as the diplomatist Richard Greatham.
Nothing on the periphery compares with the glamour and surprise element in the performances of Maggie Smith and Lynn Redgrave in the National’s famous 1964 revival – Belinda Lang’s Myra Arundel, who allegedly goes around using sex as a shrimping net, is a fairly one-note vamp, while Olivia Darnley’s chubby flapper, Jackie Coryton, is a little too subdued and submerged.
I loved the Gothic weirdness and extremity of Declan Donnellan’s version in Coward’s centenary year, and Hall has lifted a few ideas from that, playing up the thunderclaps in the final act and allowing Lin Blakley’s housemaid Clara to launch (unwisely, I think) into an extended, operatic rendition of “Tea for Two”. But the show must be seen for the brilliance and no-nonsense artistry of its leading lady, our delightful dame of the calceolarias.
Judi Dench is the expected highlight of this very solid revival of Coward's durable comedy. Playing against type makes her even more delightful. - 71.130.57.216)
21 Jul 06
Went to see this last week and agree with many of the comments. Thought the play was good but not great but was lifted by excellent performances from Judi and Kim Metcalfe and Dan Stevens. Judi is clearly too old for the role but with comic timing and stage presence like hers, you quickly forget the glaring age difference. Peter Bowles had no role to speak of really and did little with what he did have. But that aside had a thoroughly enjoyable evening and would recommend to anyone who can face paying £50! - 160.83.32.14)
17 Jul 06
Judi Dench is wasted in this. She doesn't need to work very hard, its all too easy and whilst she makes it funny, its not enough from a weak play with a cast around her who are patchy in their performances. With actors like Peter Bowles and Belinda Lang on stage we need better. Dissapointing! - 86.134.163.89)
16 Jul 06
Well I must agree with the first reviewer here. It was a SHAME! Such talent. Judi bless her, we all love her, was doing As Time Goes Bye. Belinda Lang wasted her part - but surprise surprise Kim Medcalf was a revelation. It'll get the tourists Americans especially but I think Peter Hall has a lot to answer for at £50+ a top price ticket! - 195.93.21.40)
11 Jul 06
I haven't seen this play before & didn't realise Coward wrote farces: his other works are always sharply witty, but usually quite languid. In this one, once the eccentric (for the time, probably less so nowadays) central family of 4 get up a head of steam in act 2, the play just rips along like a well greased piston.
At first it was hard to accept the unrealistic age gap between Dame Judi & her children, but once she started playing up the thespian attention grabber with such ease, throwing in perfecty timed one liners, and basically commanding the stage whenever she was on, such niceties seemed trivial!
Peter Bowles played, well ... Peter Bowles as he always seems to, but since that was just right for the part it worked OK.
I still don't know if Kim Medcalf's talents transfer well from the small screen to stage as we got her understudy. I can't remember her name, but she was a very knowingly wistful Sorrel.
I recognised Dan Stevens from the recent Line of Beauty on TV. I found that an overhyped disappointment, but as the son in this he showed that he can act given a proper script. He even managed to wrest centre stage from Dame Judi in the charade scene, which is no mean feat.
The 4 guests were all pretty good, especially Charles Edward whose rubber-faced expressions reminded me of Dominique Pinon, the French film actor in Delicatessen, City of the Lost Children, etc.
Reading the programme after the show confirmed that the actress playing the housemaid is much younger than the role, and that showed through in her performance. I also agree with the main reviewer that her singing Tea for Two was a bit random - what they call in the film industry an 'unmotivated shot' leaving the audience wondering what it has to do with the storyline!
And so to an overall score. I cannot give it 5 as the play itself is very amusing but essentially inconsequential. The acting was not uniformly excellent, which should drop it another half point. However, I think people should go to the play as it is a rare opportunity to see Dame Judi off screen these days, so I will plump for a slightly overgenerous 4. - 158.234.250.71)
16 Jun 06
Now for the play. Well the play only runs 2 hours including 20 min interval, and that is enought. Its a light hearted piece. Pretty much a farce without any real gripping storyline. It does have some very funny moments though, and that is thanks to great acting. ALL the cast are brilliant. Kid Medcalf was a revelation, very good, and great at comedy. Belinda Lang as always was brilliant (if ever 101 dalmations comes to the stage she would be a brilliant cruella!!).
The guy who played the son (forgotten his name!!) was brilliant, reminded be of a younger Jack Davenport.
The set was a huge surprise, it really worked and looked expensive. Loved it.
Now as for Dame Judi, yes it may not be the most challenging dramatic role, but who cares. In many ways it was an exagerated form of her As Time Goes By character. But she was brilliant, great comic timing, it is a privilage to watch her. She is a real star, and yes worth the high prices. Although I noticed she had chubby ankles!! not noticed that before. She is a little too old really for the role, but who cares, she carries it off perfectly.
Overall, I couldnt rave about the play, average piece, even with some very funny moments. You are paying for the cast and production values - but when its all this good - I dont care if the play is just average! - 86.139.10.52)
03 Jun 06
This does exactly what it says on the box: Coward's hugely witty and well-loved comedy is exquisitely revived on a sumptuously Bohemian set with a stellar cast. Judi Dench has the audience eating out of the palm of her hand, and Kim Medcalf makes an assured W/End debut; sterling support from all. No surprises here maybe, but utterly delightful entertainment. Gorgeous. - 195.82.123.181)
18 May 06
Having never seen a production of the show before, I can't compare it to anything, but this production was truely wonderful. The actual play was quite funny, but I think Judy Dench's amazing comic timing added a lot to it. The whole cast were excellent and Dame Judy seemed to be in her element as a slightly dotty old woman. The set and lighting were also great. - 193.201.196.10)
04 May 06
My wife and I saw the 3rd preview performance of Hay Fever last night. We had a thoroughly good time. Yes, things will loosen up [in a good way!] with time, but even at this early stage it was clear that the performers had been cast well. They were, without exception, superb; the audience and the cast were having a whale of a time [just as a Noel Coward play should be]. - 87.90.224.250)
14 Apr 06
Hay Fever was an absolute delight! We don't usually go for Noël Coward-type plays, but like many I'm sure were drawn in by Judi Dench appearing. We saw it on only its second night and, while the odd line was fluffed, overall the production was excellent! The cast were clearly having a ball, and the energy and enthusiasm was infectious. Not the cheapest play out, but one I'd definitely recommend if you just want to get away from it all and laugh. - 86.139.22.43)
Opened 29 Dec 1720. Closed in 1737 (partly for attacking the government), re-opened 1747. The current theatre opened on 4th July 1821 and was designed by Nash. The last theatre in London to use candles (1837). 888 seats. Society of London Theatre member.
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.