  | We were very disappointed in this year's Watford pantomime. If the Palace want to move in the direction of a modern show, then why not go the whole hog and get a B list celebrity. For me, the Palace will need to return to tradition before I book again. I've been going to the Palace pantomime on and off for about fifty years so I might be expected to be bit reactionary, but my party ranged in age from 4 to 73. The four year old had his hands over his ears to protect him from the over loud music and the 11 year old complained that she "couldn't understand a word" when they were singing. My son (37) though the costumes were awful.
I enjoyed the overall effect of the palette of the costumes and set design, but what on earth was the fairy godmother's outfit meant to be? It was neither magical nor was it comical - it looked like a pornographic image from the 1900's.
Prince Charming sang well, Dandini was awful and what was the point of Buttons french lesson? Not enough was made of Cinderella's plight. The business of the community song and the children on stage was truncated - the cast seemed anxious to get the whole sorry event over with. Although the panto was billed as lasting 2 hours, with a half hour interval the show felt extremely short and it seemed as if the traditional elements were added as an afterthought
Not enough, 'it's behind you', not enough 'oh no she isn't', not enough slapstick, not enough magic, not enough beauty. Much too much loud music - the band completely drowned out the singers at times. Too much innovation in the costumes. Cinderella looked like a contestant on 'strictly come dancing' in the ball scene and her wedding dress which should out meringue a meringue, was simply dowdy.
Please remember Watford, in time for next year, that you have a long record of producing traditional family pantomimes. Pantomime should be a contrast between beauty and the grotesque. I'm afraid this performance lost its way.
- Sally Davies | 04 Jan 10 |