4 November 2009 WOS Rating: Reader Reviews: View and add to our user reviews Pamela Carter’s new play promises to be an interesting, thought provoking study of the relationship between the two genders, and their interaction with risk. However, it fails to deliver. Written as a self styled response to [Pierre de Marivaux’s] ‘La Dispute’, the piece aims to open up the age old debate about what makes men, ‘men’ and women ‘women’.
The play opens in an unnamed office where the audience meet lawyer Helen (
Selina Boyack) and hedge fund manager Charlie ( Stuart Bowman). We quickly learn of a fling between the pair resulting in a pregnancy and what follows is the relentless bombardment of popular statements about the differences between men and woman.
The lack of chemistry from Boyack and Bowman coupled with an uninspiring script makes for an uneasy start, leaving the audience feeling they are watching an intellectual slanging match, not unlike a middle-class episode of
The Jeremy Kyle Show.
Towards the end of the first half the play picks up much needed pace and
Stewart Laing’s direction becomes apparent: Charlie reveals his involvement in a TV production company that has secretly brought up four children in isolation from the rest of society and intends to broadcast them meeting for the first time.
The audience are invited to follow the characters through a door into a Garden of Eden like room where we are greeted by the irritatingly sweet Krystal (
Elizabeth Chan) and her humorous meeting with David Judge’s loveable Blake. What ensues is an entertaining and childlike fusion of excitement, curiosity and discovery which has an innocence to it reminicent of A Midsummer’s Night Dream. Cush Jumbo as Charlene and Adrian Quinton as Scott, both put in good performances, racing in between the audience and playing in the onstage water stream.
But the real surprise moment is the sudden interruption of the play by a recorded video of an interview with writer Carter, director Laing and the science writer, Matt Ridley. The clip explores the ‘nature vs nurture’ quandary and satisfies the audience with a post show discussion before any applause has been handed out. Laing’s realisation and execution of the play is the redeeming factor of what would otherwise be a predictable script that lacks focus.
- Harrison Kelly
Related Content Back to Scotland Homepage
Subscribe to our free newsletter
Featured Editor's Picks
: The economic impact of Arts & Culture in the UK Infographic When Culture Secretary Maria Miller called for the arts to make their "economic case" for subsidy, t... Plays Cast: Harry Potter star in Southwark Moment, more for Branagh's Macbeth Bonnie Wright, best known for playing Ginny Weasley in the Harry Potter films, will make her stage d... Brief Encounter with ... The Kite Runner's Ben Turner Ben Turner stars in the stage version of the bestselling book The Kite Runner, which runs at Liverpo... Titus Andronicus (RSC) This latest production of Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus, to borrow from football punditry, is a p... : Britain's outdoor theatres Take Five With half-term approaching, the weather (hopefully) set to improve for the bank holiday weekend and ... West End Live returns to Trafalgar Square next month West End Live, a weekend of free entertainment from top London shows, will return to Trafalgar Squar... : 'I carry the ghost of Gregory Peck on my shoulders' Robert Sean Leonard Actor Robert Sean Leonard is currently playing Atticus Finch in Timothy Sheader's production of To K... To Kill A Mockingbird Twenty years ago, a young Robert Sean Leonard appeared on the London stage with Alan Alda in... X Factor musical titled I Can't Sing!, opens Palladium March 2014 The forthcoming X Factor musical will be called I Can't Sing! The Musical and will premiere at the L... Donmar stages Nick Payne premiere, Wesker's Roots & Tom Hiddleston in Coriolanus The Donmar Warehouse has announced its new season, which features the premiere of Nick Payne's new p...