I came to Mademoiselle Julie from the opposite end of the spectrum from JEChenique, having no knowledge of the play at all, so I had no expectations of it beyond my pleasure at having a chance to see Juliette Binoche live, and my anticipation of seeing my first Strinberg.
Apart from these differences, however, I absolutely agree with his/her critique.
My husband said as we left "This has just gone to the top of my list of plays never to see again". Sad!
- Gill B
26 Sep 12
I love the original Strindberg play. It's one of my personal favorites, and I never miss the chance to see it again. I love watching it adapted to different times or styles, I adore some of the scenic mutations some directors impose on the text. That's really great. Now... This French chic production... It's just hollow. From the set to the light, from the actors to the dancing chorus, nothing makes much sense. The actors are way too old, the lighting too bright, the time set is just wrong. There's nothing that suggest that Jean is a servant and Julie a Lady. At some points, you have to cover your eyes or let your retinas burn under the intense light that comes from the stage. Then, two members of the chorus get the stage... only to show how bizarre are the costumes they are in. Complete nonsense.
I can't blame the actors. They tried their best. The direction was wrong. It made me think the director didn't understand the play at all, that he choose this great classic just because it seemed a nice romantic vessel to his visual obsessions.
The only thing I could think after leaving the Barbican was: Why. Why would anyone destroy so thoroughly such a wonderful text. Why would any director ignore so blatantly the subtle subtext (and not so subtle setting) of this play. More importantly: Why would the Barbican put this on their stage, and make us pay such a fortune to watch a train wreck like this. It doesn't make any sense.
Strindberg imagined his play in a kitchen, with all the associated meaning it has when talking about social differences. This french director turns that perfectly fine idea into a carnival of nonsensical avant garde design, fake forests, white fishbowls and over the top dancers who upstaged the main actors all the time.
In another department, with all the glass walls, the actors were forced to use microphones, which was a huge downer. When you can hear the breathing better than the voice, all suspension of disbelief is completely broken, and you end up staring at some French actors trying to save a ship that sunk before the play started.
It's really hard to find a play where everything is just wrong. If you want to be angry and disappointed, don't miss Mademoiselle Julie at the Barbican; it's everything you fear and much more.
In one word: Pathetic. - JEChenique