I hadn't realised it was basically the same production as the one staged a fw years back in London. That said, it was a wonderfully enjoyable evening - the whole cast was on good form and I laughed so much it hurt. Fabulous :-) - Paul Wallis
26 Feb 12
Very funny. Celia Imrie is excellent & I didn't find it dated. It was as good as the Savoy Theatre production over 20 years ago. - Celia Langford
09 Feb 12
Cannot believe some of the poor reviews below. This is the funniest play I've ever seen in the west end. Superb comic timing delivered by a top notch cast. My ribs are still aching from laughing so much. Can't wait to go and see it again! - Samuel
04 Feb 12
I think I need therapy having found this play so childish, dated and utterly unfunny given that it seems universally adored by everyone. Perhaps its loved for nostalgic reasons, by people longing for a return to simpler less sophisticated times. It is brilliantly rehearsed with perfect timing that is of great credit to the actors. This compliment paid, the end result is embarrasingly overacted, infantile and the kind of thing that has tourists looking on with disbelief muttering how on earth did they win the war. - Neil
03 Feb 12
This is a little like Fawlty Towers without John Cleese. The set-up of act one is precise, if not funny, and it pays off perfectly in farcical terms in act 2. However, without a central actor with funny bones, like John Cleese, the laughter caoasts at giggles level, never approaching belly laughs. While Jamie Glover proves astonishingly adroit at falling down stairs, he is merely amusing trying to assault his "love rival." Jonathan Coy is the most naturally funny performer, but he is not given the most aggressively farcical moments. It's no surprise to me that on the strength of this kind of writing, Frayn went on to work with John Cleese, the kind of performer it takes to bring belly laughs from Frayn's set-ups. It could be Lenny Henry, James Corden or even Mark Rylance or Simon Russell Beale, but without the comic timing of these kinds of performers, shows like this never take flight. - steveatplays
15 Jan 12
A great show. Saw it years ago and it is sure fire hit every time it is revived. Great cast with special mention to Celia Imrie, Robert Glenister, Amy Nuttal and Janie Dee---a good fun show and great night out - Joe Spiteri
08 Jan 12
I found this to be a much better production than the two previous reviewers. I think it's always a mistake to compare performances performances, and I Robert Glenister did a good job - though VERY different from Paul Eddington. Celia Imrie was a delight, and the script is just wonderful. How someone fell asleep I cannot imagine! - Gill B
04 Jan 12
Fell asleep in the first half and it really did not improve very much in the second half. - Diane
28 Dec 11
Dreadful! Badly miscast and misdirected. What should have had us rolling in the aisles was worse than what it was trying to send. FARCE is one of the hardest tricks to pull off and requires actors with a real gift for comedy. Robert Glenister was just plain bloody awful. When I think back all those years to Paul Eddington's superb performance and later Peter Egan's it makes one weep! Eddington was wonderful as the camp ol' ham of a director. The other players, too, hadn't anything going for them. It was farce with the comedy surgically removed. Enough to put anyone off theatre for life. - rds
27 Dec 11
I've seen many plays in London over the last few years, and for me this is the best for a long time.
I took my parents to see the play for a Christmas present, and, bless her, my mother said her ribs were still hurting from laughter the next day.
The play works like clockwork, but farce needs that tight direction, and this production succeeds wonderfully.
Farce, and indeed theatre, doesn't get better than this. - David